KANT-STUDIEN最新文献_第8页

Kasuistik und Theorie des Gewissens. Von Pascal bis Kant. Hrsg. von Sara Di Giulio und Alberto Frigo. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2020. VIII und 343 Seiten. ISBN 978-3-11-062185-3. 我的良心和思想从帕斯卡尔到Kant。Hrsg .我立刻杀了她柏林/波士顿:2020年。跟343页一样书978-3-11-062185-3 .

IF 0.5 3区哲学

KANT-STUDIEN Pub Date : 2023-03-08 DOI: 10.1515/kant-2023-2001

B. Gerlach

引用次数: 0

Antinomy of Reason or Transcendental Deduction? Making Sense of the Dialectic of Pure Practical Reason 理性二律背反还是先验演绎?理解纯粹实践理性的辩证法

IF 0.5 3区哲学

KANT-STUDIEN Pub Date : 2023-03-08 DOI: 10.1515/kant-2022-2040

K. Kerimov

{"title":"Antinomy of Reason or Transcendental Deduction? Making Sense of the Dialectic of Pure Practical Reason","authors":"K. Kerimov","doi":"10.1515/kant-2022-2040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2022-2040","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present article focuses on the antinomy of pure practical reason and the deduction of the Highest Good in the Dialectic of Pure Practical Reason (in the second Critique). Although Kant claims that the Dialectic contains both the antinomy and the deduction, the boundaries dividing one from the other are at best vague. It is difficult to make out where the antinomy of practical reason ends and where the deduction begins. To locate both and to distinguish one from the other (with special attention paid to the modality of the Highest Good) are the chief aims of this article. Additionally but no less importantly, I show, against the line of criticism originally traceable to Schopenhauer, that the antinomy of practical reason amounts to more than a reflection of Kant’s “architectonic obsession.” Not only does the antinomy of practical reason correspond to a genuine dialectical problem in the Critique of Practical Reason, but it also shares a fundamental (even if not immediately apparent) similarity with the antinomy of pure speculative reason. Finally, I consider Kant’s transcendental deduction of the Highest Good against the backdrop of his other deductions, especially the deduction of the categories in the Critique of Pure Reason, and defend it against the charge of potential circularity.","PeriodicalId":45952,"journal":{"name":"KANT-STUDIEN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46316811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Anton Wilhelm Amo’s Philosophical Dissertations on Mind and Body. Edited and translated by Stephen Menn and Justin E. H. Smith. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020. 248 pp. ISBN 9780197501627.

IF 0.5 3区哲学

KANT-STUDIEN Pub Date : 2023-03-08 DOI: 10.1515/kant-2023-2007

J. Walsh

引用次数: 0

Christian Garve (1742–1798). Philosoph und Philologe der Aufklärung. Hrsg. von Udo Roth u. Gideon Stiening [= Werkprofile, Bd. 14]. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter 2021. IX/400 Seiten. ISBN 978-3-11-064590-3. – Christian Garve: Ausgewählte Werke, Bd. 1: Kleine Schriften. Hrsg. v. Udo Roth u. Gideon Stiening [= Werkprofile, Bd. 15.1]. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter 2021. XXIX/414 Seiten. ISBN 978-3-11-064592-7. 克里斯蒂安葛夫启蒙运动哲学家和语言学家。Hrsg .打开大门柏林/波士顿:德格鲁耶特。. IX / 400页书978-3-11-064590-3 .克里斯汀·加尔夫:独家作品，黑火药第一版:Hrsg .打开大门柏林/波士顿:德格鲁耶特。# . / 414页书978-3-11-064592-7 .

3区哲学

KANT-STUDIEN Pub Date : 2023-03-08 DOI: 10.1515/kant-2023-2006

Clemens Schwaiger

引用次数: 0

The Highest Good as the Ideal of Reason in the Canon of the first Critique 作为理性理想的最高善在第一批判经典中的地位