Linguistic Typology最新文献_第2页

Towards a phonological typology of the Kalahari Basin Area languages 卡拉哈里盆地地区语言的音系类型学研究

IF 2 2区文学

Linguistic Typology Pub Date : 2023-05-12 DOI: 10.1515/lingty-2022-0047

Hirosi Nakagawa, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Daniel Auer, Anne-Maria Fehn, Linda Ammann Gerlach, Tom Güldemann, Sylvanus Job, Florian Lionnet, Christfried Naumann, Hitomi Ono, Lee J. Pratchett

引用次数: 0

Frontmatter 头版头条

2区文学

Linguistic Typology Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1515/lingty-2023-frontmatter1

引用次数: 0

Investigating the ‘what’, ‘where’ and ‘why’ of global phonological typology 研究全球语音类型学的“什么”、“在哪里”和“为什么”

IF 2 2区文学

Linguistic Typology Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI: 10.1515/lingty-2022-0076

I. Maddieson

引用次数: 0

The interplay of contrast markers (‘but’), selectives (“topic markers”) and word order in the fuzzy oppositive contrast domain 对比标记(“但是”)、选择标记(“主题标记”)和语序在模糊对立对比领域中的相互作用

2区文学

Linguistic Typology Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI: 10.1515/lingty-2022-0019

Bernhard Wälchli

{"title":"The interplay of contrast markers (‘but’), selectives (“topic markers”) and word order in the fuzzy oppositive contrast domain","authors":"Bernhard Wälchli","doi":"10.1515/lingty-2022-0019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2022-0019","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This investigation is a large-scale comparative corpus study of the oppositive contrast domain (also called “semantic opposition”) based on parallel texts. Oppositive contrast is established as a fuzzy region of the similarity space of contrast (‘but’), a domain also characterized by the occurrence of selectives (“topic markers”) and of initial non-predicative phrases in VSO/VOS-languages. Major findings are that many languages have special oppositive contrast markers and that there is a continuum between oppositive contrast markers and selectives, although truly intermediate markers are rare. The gradualness between oppositive and counterexpectative contrast is explained by semantic fuzziness and by emphasis, with strong emphasis being dependent on scales. Contrast is a rhetorical discourse relation and strong oppositive contrast can be used as a persuasive strategy aiming at establishing new common ground stepwise. The fuzziness of oppositive contrast has major theoretical and methodological implications. The encoding of the domain neither follows strict universals nor is it maximally diverse (diversity is strongly constrained). Due to its syntactic properties, oppositive contrast cannot be conceived of merely as a preestablished extralinguistic semantic domain. Furthermore, contrast exhibits a high degree of language-internal variability. General trends are reflected both by stable and by emergent grammar.","PeriodicalId":45834,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Typology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135613279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Lawyer, Lewis C. 2021. A grammar of Patwin. Studies in the Native Languages of the Americas. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; Bloomington: In cooperation with the American Indian Studies Research Institute, Indiana University. ISBN 9781496221193 (hardback), ISBN 9781496222770 (pdf). 律师，Lewis C.2021。Patwin的语法。美洲土著语言研究。林肯：内布拉斯加大学出版社；布鲁明顿：与印第安纳大学美国印第安人研究所合作。ISBN 9781496221193（精装本），ISBN 978149 6222770（pdf）。

IF 2 2区文学

Linguistic Typology Pub Date : 2023-04-12 DOI: 10.1515/lingty-2022-0061

U. Balodis

引用次数: 0

Directionality in the psych alternation: a quantitative cross-linguistic study 心理交替中的方向性:一项定量的跨语言研究

IF 2 2区文学

Linguistic Typology Pub Date : 2023-04-11 DOI: 10.1515/lingty-2021-0060

J. Rott, Elisabeth Verhoeven, Paola Fritz-Huechante

{"title":"Directionality in the psych alternation: a quantitative cross-linguistic study","authors":"J. Rott, Elisabeth Verhoeven, Paola Fritz-Huechante","doi":"10.1515/lingty-2021-0060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2021-0060","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Languages display global preferences for transitive, intransitive or underspecified roots in their verbal lexicon and correspondingly for the use of processes for deriving related concepts with different valency (cf. Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson & Jonathan Barnes. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8. 149–211). This classification is particularly relevant when applied to psych verbs, since variable linking is a widely recognized feature of this domain. This paper reports on the results of a larger typological study, involving 26 languages from 15 language families, aimed at investigating directionality in the psych alternation. In our data, most languages show preferences for one of the alternation strategies (augmented, reduced, undirected) which is then pervasive in their psych inventory, while the alternative patterns are marginally represented. Furthermore, the Indo-European languages of Europe stand out in being detransitivizing in the psych domain whereas transitivizing and underspecified languages do not show areal patterns. Moreover, we found a significant impact of alignment type on the occurrence of alternation strategies to the effect that reducing strategies are significantly less frequent in languages with ergative traits compared to languages without ergative traits. Our data also showed a positive effect of alignment in the undirected strategies meaning that undirected pairs are significantly more frequent in languages with ergative traits.","PeriodicalId":45834,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Typology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42262972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

On the expression of mistaken beliefs in Australian languages 论澳大利亚语言中错误信念的表达

2区文学

Linguistic Typology Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI: 10.1515/lingty-2022-0023

William B. McGregor

引用次数: 0

Word prosody of African versus European-origin words in Afro-European creoles 非洲-欧洲克里奥尔语中非洲词与欧洲词的韵律

2区文学

Linguistic Typology Pub Date : 2023-03-20 DOI: 10.1515/lingty-2022-0043

Ana Lívia Agostinho

引用次数: 0

The typological frequency of consonants is highly predictive of their order of acquisition in English 辅音的类型频率在很大程度上可以预测其在英语中的习得顺序

IF 2 2区文学

Linguistic Typology Pub Date : 2023-02-22 DOI: 10.1515/lingty-2022-0033

C. Everett, Sophie Schwartz

引用次数: 0

A sampling technique for worldwide comparisons of language contact scenarios 一种用于世界范围内语言接触情景比较的抽样技术

2区文学

Linguistic Typology Pub Date : 2023-02-10 DOI: 10.1515/lingty-2022-0005

Francesca Di Garbo, Ricardo Napoleão de Souza

{"title":"A sampling technique for worldwide comparisons of language contact scenarios","authors":"Francesca Di Garbo, Ricardo Napoleão de Souza","doi":"10.1515/lingty-2022-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2022-0005","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Existing sampling methods in language typology strive to control for areal biases in typological datasets as a means to avoid contact effects in the distribution of linguistic structure. However, none of these methods provide ways to directly compare contact scenarios from a typological perspective. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a sampling procedure for worldwide comparisons of language contact scenarios. The sampling unit consists of sets of three languages. The Focus Language is the language whose structures we examine in search for contact effects; the Neighbor Language is genealogically unrelated to the Focus Language, and counts as the potential source of contact influence on the Focus Language; the Benchmark Language is a relative of the Focus Language neither in contact with the Focus nor with the Neighbor language, and is used for disentangling contact effects from genealogical inheritance in the Focus Language. Through this design, we compiled a sample of 49 three-language sets (147 languages in total), which we present here. By switching the focus of typological sampling from individual languages to contact relations between languages, our method has the potential of uncovering patterns in the diffusion of language structures, and how they vary and change.","PeriodicalId":45834,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Typology","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136096964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0