发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Ethics After Comparative Religious Ethics: Rereading Little and Twiss in a Pragmatic Light 比较宗教伦理学之后的伦理学：从实用主义的角度重读利特尔和特维斯
IF 0.4 3区 哲学
JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI: 10.1111/jore.12450
Jung H. Lee
{"title":"Ethics After Comparative Religious Ethics: Rereading Little and Twiss in a Pragmatic Light","authors":"Jung H. Lee","doi":"10.1111/jore.12450","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jore.12450","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents a rereading of David Little and Sumner Twiss's <i>Comparative Religious Ethics</i> in the context of its initial reception and legacy within the field of religious ethics and argues that we can read it more charitably as a piece of pragmatism rather than as a work of formalism or semi-formalism. If one does not read Little and Twiss as committed positivists concerned with realizing a specific research program associated with the “twilight of logical empiricism,” then their theoretical and methodological recommendations, illustrated in their case studies, appear more pragmatic in nature and less excessively rigid. By rereading <i>Comparative Religious Ethics</i> in this light, we can see more clearly its relevance for the field today, particularly regarding the fundamental importance of the discursive activity of practical reasoning, or the game of giving and asking for reasons, in the study of religious ethics.</p>","PeriodicalId":45722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","volume":"52 1","pages":"71-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jore.12450","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135968159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conscientious Objection in Healthcare: The Requirement of Justification, the Moral Threshold, and Military Refusals 医疗保健中的依良心拒服兵役：正当理由要求、道德门槛和军事拒绝
IF 0.4 3区 哲学
JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI: 10.1111/jore.12451
Tomasz Żuradzki
{"title":"Conscientious Objection in Healthcare: The Requirement of Justification, the Moral Threshold, and Military Refusals","authors":"Tomasz Żuradzki","doi":"10.1111/jore.12451","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jore.12451","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A dogma accepted in many ethical, religious, and legal frameworks is that the reasons behind conscientious objection (CO) in healthcare cannot be evaluated or judged by any institution because conscience is individual and autonomous. This paper shows that this background view is mistaken: the requirement to reveal and explain the reasons for conscientious objection in healthcare is ethically justified and legally desirable. Referring to real healthcare cases and legal regulations, this paper argues that these reasons should be evaluated either ex ante or ex post and defends novel conceptual claims that have not been analyzed in the debates on CO. First, a moral threshold requirement: CO is only justified if the reasons behind a refusal are of a moral nature and meet a certain threshold of moral importance. Second, this paper considers the rarely discussed conceptual similarities between CO in healthcare and the legal regulations concerning military refusals that place the burden of proof on conscientious objectors. This paper concludes that conscientious objection in healthcare can be accommodated only in some cases of destroying or killing human organisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":45722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","volume":"52 1","pages":"133-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jore.12451","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135591394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Logic of Kingian Nonviolence: A Synthetic Reading of Martin Luther King Jr.'s Political Thought 金非暴力的逻辑:马丁·路德·金政治思想的综合解读
IF 0.4 3区 哲学
JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS Pub Date : 2023-09-07 DOI: 10.1111/jore.12449
Nicholas Buck
{"title":"The Logic of Kingian Nonviolence: A Synthetic Reading of Martin Luther King Jr.'s Political Thought","authors":"Nicholas Buck","doi":"10.1111/jore.12449","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jore.12449","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Approaching Martin Luther King Jr. as a constructive political theorist, I present a synthetic view of his thought that is able to make cogent and compelling sense of prominent concepts and lines of reasoning in his writings. I contend that King's political thought, which is grounded in his moral, metaphysical, and theological convictions, is best understood as structurally teleological and oriented to the construction of an inclusive, democratic community as its end. To make this case and fill out the picture of his view, I offer an analysis of King's “Letter from Birmingham Jail” and argue that his account of nonviolence, which provides the key to understanding his political thought, ought to be understood as operating within and on behalf of this teleological vision by patterning what I term dialogical relations between persons.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":45722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","volume":"52 1","pages":"26-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48303786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tainted Legacies and the Journal of Religious Ethics 《污点遗产》和《宗教伦理杂志
IF 0.5 3区 哲学
JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI: 10.1111/jore.12441
Karen V. Guth
{"title":"Tainted Legacies and the Journal of Religious Ethics","authors":"Karen V. Guth","doi":"10.1111/jore.12441","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jore.12441","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This essay reflects on the role academic journals like the <i>JRE</i> can play in facilitating and addressing tainted legacies. As an institution in religious ethics, the journal not only determines whose work is important, but it also replicates such judgments, passing certain sets of issues, concerns, and methods down from the past to the present, shaping future work. Journals highlight the systemic, structural elements of legacies that we often neglect in heated debate over how to respond to them. Consequently, they illuminate the complexity of the problems tainted legacies present. I first discuss three ways a journal like the <i>JRE</i> facilitates the structural features of tainted legacies in religious ethics. I then suggest how the <i>JRE</i> might implement a position I call the “reformer” in response to such legacies. This position emphasizes practices of moral repair designed to challenge the systemic injustices that underlay tainted legacies.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":45722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","volume":"51 4","pages":"673-689"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47159816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Stroke Patients' Needs after Discharge from Rehabilitation Centres: Meta-Ethnography. 探索脑卒中患者从康复中心出院后的需求：Meta-Ethnography.
IF 2.5 3区 哲学
JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI: 10.3390/bs12100404
Basema Temehy, Sheeba Rosewilliam, George Alvey, Andrew Soundy
{"title":"Exploring Stroke Patients' Needs after Discharge from Rehabilitation Centres: Meta-Ethnography.","authors":"Basema Temehy, Sheeba Rosewilliam, George Alvey, Andrew Soundy","doi":"10.3390/bs12100404","DOIUrl":"10.3390/bs12100404","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare providers must consider stroke survivors needs in order to enable a good quality of life after stroke. This review aimed to investigate the perceived needs of the stroke survivors across various domains of care following their discharge from hospital. A meta-ethnographic review of qualitative studies that reported needs of stroke patients after discharge from rehabilitation services was conducted. Main searches were conducted on the following electronic databases: Ovid Medline (1946 to 2021), CINAHL plus (EBSCO), AMED (EBSCO), PsycINFO (1967 to 2021), the Cochrane Library, and PubMed in June 2022. Main outcomes were related to stroke survivors' views, experiences, and preferences on physical, psychological, social, rehabilitation needs, and other identified needs. Twenty-seven studies were included in the final analysis. The findings show that existing rehabilitation provision for stroke survivors does not address the long-term needs of stroke survivors. Two main issues were revealed concerning the unmet needs of stroke survivors: (1) a lack of information availability and suitability and (2) inadequacy of care and services. It is crucial to further investigate the needs of patients in Asian countries and the Middle East as there is very limited understanding of patients' needs in the community in these regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9598696/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85195786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aquinas's Opposition to Killing the Innocent and its Distinctiveness within the Christian just War Tradition 阿奎那反对滥杀无辜及其在基督教正义战争传统中的独特性
IF 0.4 3区 哲学
JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS Pub Date : 2017-09-01 DOI: 10.17863/CAM.7106
D. Weiss
{"title":"Aquinas's Opposition to Killing the Innocent and its Distinctiveness within the Christian just War Tradition","authors":"D. Weiss","doi":"10.17863/CAM.7106","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.7106","url":null,"abstract":"This essay argues that Aquinas's position regarding the killing of innocent people differs significantly from other representatives of the Christian just war tradition. While his predecessors, notably Augustine, as well as his successors, from Cajetan and Vitoria onward, affirm the legitimacy of causing the death of innocents in a just war in cases of necessity, Aquinas holds that causing the death of innocents in a foreseeable manner, whether intentionally or indirectly, is never justified. Even an otherwise legitimate act of just war cannot legitimate causing the death of innocent people, as this can never advance the common good. This stance also contrasts sharply with much modern and contemporary double effect theorizing in relation to jus in bello. In this regard, Aquinas's position, shaped decisively by his biblical and theological commitments, may point the way towards an ethical orientation beyond the typical divisions of “pacifism” and “just war.”","PeriodicalId":45722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","volume":"45 1","pages":"481-509"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47252566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Genre of Judgment. Description and Difficulty in the Anthropology of Ethics 审判的体裁。伦理学人类学中的描述与难点
IF 0.4 3区 哲学
JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS Pub Date : 2016-08-05 DOI: 10.17863/CAM.89
P. McKearney
{"title":"The Genre of Judgment. Description and Difficulty in the Anthropology of Ethics","authors":"P. McKearney","doi":"10.17863/CAM.89","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.89","url":null,"abstract":"This is the accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12153","PeriodicalId":45722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","volume":"44 1","pages":"544-573"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2016-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67573207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信