Intertax最新文献_第7页

Literature Review: CO2-Steuern: eine rechtliche Einordnung möglicher Ausgestaltungsoptionen in Österreich, Robin Damberger. Schriften zum österreichischen Abgabenrecht vol. 85. LexisNexis. 2021 这些文学作品:碳税:着手着手在奥地利开展的各种可能的组合，这是Robin Damberger。工业相关章程的修正案LexisNexis .2021

IF 0.6

Intertax Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.54648/taxi2022091

K. Messerschmidt

引用次数: 0

Tax In History: Some Notes on Luigi Einaudi and the Legacy of His ‘Principles of Public Finance’. A Fiscal Mythoclast in Retrospect 历史上的税收：关于路易吉·艾诺迪及其“公共财政原则”遗产的一些注释。财政神话的回顾

IF 0.6

Intertax Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.54648/taxi2022088

A. Turina

引用次数: 0

Article: Pillar 2: An Analysis of the IIR and UTPR from an International Customary Law, Tax Treaty Law and European Union Law Perspective 第2支柱:从国际习惯法、税收条约法和欧盟法的角度分析国际税收关系和UTPR

IF 0.6

Intertax Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.54648/taxi2022098

Filip Debelva, L. de Broe

引用次数: 0

Policy Note: Blockchain Technology: Potential for Digital Tax Administration 政策说明：区块链技术：数字税务的潜力

IF 0.6

Intertax Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.54648/taxi2022087

J. Owens, S. Hodžić

{"title":"Policy Note: Blockchain Technology: Potential for Digital Tax Administration","authors":"J. Owens, S. Hodžić","doi":"10.54648/taxi2022087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2022087","url":null,"abstract":"Currently, blockchain is one of the most innovative emerging digital technologies. As such, it can undermine traditional business models and revolutionize tax administration. This objective of this article is to present the potential of blockchain technology in the administration of specific tax categories such as payroll taxes, value added tax, international taxes, and customs. It also analyses blockchain technology’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) with a focus on tax administration. As a generator of a substantial amount of information, tax administration requires reliable and efficient technology for processing and storing the information that is generated. The results of the analysis showed strengths such as a lower cost of fulfilling tax liabilities, a direct connection with taxpayers without the need of third parties. a higher degree of efficiency, and threats such as insufficient funds for modernization, knowledge and skills of employees, and willingness to adapt and high investment costs related to implementation. Moreover, it will modernize accounting and tax payments.\u0000Blockchain technology, digitalization, tax administration, SWOT analysis, digital economy, digital services, tax policy","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44241585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Editorial: Time for a Rethink? 社论:是时候重新思考了?

IF 0.6

Intertax Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.54648/taxi2022090

Stef van Weeghel

引用次数: 0

Article: GloBE Rules and Tax Competition 文章:全球规则与税收竞争

IF 0.6

Intertax Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.54648/taxi2022086

J. Englisch

{"title":"Article: GloBE Rules and Tax Competition","authors":"J. Englisch","doi":"10.54648/taxi2022086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2022086","url":null,"abstract":"This article studies foreseeable effects that a relatively comprehensive implementation of the Pillar 2 GloBE international effective minimum tax would have on international tax competition for investment. The discussion focuses on the perspective of countries that seek to attract foreign direct investment through their tax system. The paper shows that there was disagreement within the G20/OECD Inclusive Framework (IF) about the objective to curb international tax competition through a minimum tax. The reservations of some member countries have manifested themselves in the compromise design of the internationally agreed GloBE regime: With the carve-out for substance-based routine profits (the so-called SBIE), the IF abandoned the idea of setting a general floor for business tax competition at the agreed minimum rate. Instead, the SBIE establishes an effective 15 % floor only for the taxation of excess profits. Due to the additional possibility for source countries to collect any eventual minimum tax themselves through a qualified domestic minimum top-up tax (QDMTT), tax competition could theoretically continue unabated above this floor, implying the successive substitution of traditional business taxation with a domestic minimum tax mimicking the international GloBE top-up tax. Taking into account fiscal, legal, and political constraints, however, such an extreme scenario is unlikely to materialize. A broad GloBE implementation should therefore reduce incentives to use effective tax rate below 15 % (on overall profit) in order to attract high-margin investment. This notwithstanding, certain features of the GloBE Model Rules imply that some forms of business tax competition will continue as before or even gain in relative attractiveness. Due to its – albeit moderate – mitigating effects on business tax competition, GloBE might moreover lead to intensified competition for investment through other channels.\u0000GloBE, minimum tax, Pillar 2, competition.","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42621060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Literature Review: Constitutional Competence and the Taxation of Cross-Border Transactions Between Related Parties, Clara Gomes Moreira. IBDT. 2021 文献综述：《宪法权限与关联方跨境交易的税收》，Clara Gomes Moreira著。IBDT。2021

IF 0.6

Intertax Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.54648/taxi2022092

Ramon Tomazela

引用次数: 0

Article: Tax Competition and the EU Anti-money Laundering Regime 文章:税收竞争与欧盟反洗钱制度

IF 0.6

Intertax Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.54648/taxi2022085

P. Denk

{"title":"Article: Tax Competition and the EU Anti-money Laundering Regime","authors":"P. Denk","doi":"10.54648/taxi2022085","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2022085","url":null,"abstract":"Member States engage in tax competition to expand their tax bases thereby risking a ‘race to the bottom’ in corporate tax revenues. The global minimum tax under Pillar Two is expected to contribute significantly to curbing this practice. Assuming that minimum taxation eliminates competition in statutory tax rates, tax competition is likely to continue. This is because countries then lower their effective tax rates by reducing tax enforcement. As audit strategies, unlike statutory tax rates, are not publicly observable, other countries cannot easily observe and can never verify them. However, countries reducing their tax enforcement adhere to a policy that implicitly encourages tax evasion. Hence, enforcement and observability problems can also be addressed indirectly by targeting their outcome – tax evasion. In most Member States, tax evasion is a predicate offence for money laundering that effectuates a very effective EU anti-money laundering (AML) regime. Its instruments cannot only serve as a tool to adequately address foreign tax evasion but also to reveal, monitor, and control, at least indirectly, other Member States’ efforts in the fight against tax evasion. AML legislation can therefore help to close a still unnoticed loophole in curbing tax competition that will not be addressed by introducing minimum taxation.\u0000Tax competition, money laundering, tax evasion, tax avoidance, tax enforcement, predicate offence, dual criminality, FATF, AMLA","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42486366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Country Note: Retroactive Taxation, Investor-State Dispute Settlement, and India: Life Comes a Full Circle 国家说明:追溯征税、投资者与国家争端解决和印度:生活回到了一个完整的循环

IF 0.6

Intertax Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.54648/taxi2022089

Prabhash Ranjan

{"title":"Country Note: Retroactive Taxation, Investor-State Dispute Settlement, and India: Life Comes a Full Circle","authors":"Prabhash Ranjan","doi":"10.54648/taxi2022089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2022089","url":null,"abstract":"After amending the Income Tax Act (IT Act) in 2012 to impose taxes retroactively on indirect transfers involving non-residents, India recently nullified this law. Towards the end of 2020, two investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) tribunals under the India-Netherlands and India- United Kingdom bilateral investment treaties (BITs) found India’s retroactive tax in breach of India’s BIT obligations. These arbitral defeats incited India to eliminate the infamous 2012 retroactive amendment to the tax laws. This article documents and analyses the sordid saga of nine long years by explaining the origin, evolution, and culmination of India’s retroactive tax misadventure. Considering the increasing number of instances for which foreign investors use the ISDS mechanism to challenge the host state’s sovereign taxation measures as BIT breaches, the ISDS rulings against India, especially by the tribunal in Cairn Energy v. India, assumes significance. A more comprehensive reading of the tribunal’s reasoning in Cairn Energy v. India elucidates that, while taxation measures are indeed an integral part of the state’s sovereign right to regulate, it has to be exercised reasonably and proportionately when furthering a public purpose. The exploitation of the power to tax disproportionately may prove to be detrimental to the state.\u0000India, retroactive tax, ISDS, BIT, Vodafone, Cairn","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48936921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Case Law Trends: Chargeable Events and Chargeability of VAT in the Context of Successive Payments: Comments in the Light of the Judgments in Cases C-324/20 and C-9/20 判例法趋势：连续支付背景下的可收费事件和增值税的可收费性：根据C-324/20和C-9/20案件的判决发表评论

IF 0.6

Intertax Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI: 10.54648/taxi2022078

Adam Bartosiewicz

引用次数: 0