CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW最新文献

Cassirer’s functionalist account of physical truth: object, measurement and technology 卡西勒对物理真理的功能主义解释：物体、测量和技术

IF 0.8 3区哲学

CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1007/s11007-024-09650-6

Benedetta Spigola

引用次数: 0

Natural sciences, technology and foresight: an approach based on Ernst Cassirer’s symbol theory 自然科学、技术与展望：基于恩斯特-卡西勒符号理论的方法

IF 0.8 3区哲学

CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1007/s11007-024-09648-0

Joaquim Braga

引用次数: 0

Mathematical sciences as symbolic form: the objects and objectivity of science in Ernst Cassirer’s philosophy of science and culture 作为符号形式的数学科学：恩斯特-卡西勒科学与文化哲学中的科学对象与客观性

IF 0.8 3区哲学

CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1007/s11007-024-09645-3

Jørgen Røysland Aarnes

{"title":"Mathematical sciences as symbolic form: the objects and objectivity of science in Ernst Cassirer’s philosophy of science and culture","authors":"Jørgen Røysland Aarnes","doi":"10.1007/s11007-024-09645-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-024-09645-3","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I explore how Cassirer’s early and mature epistemology, philosophy of science, and philosophy of culture make up a coherent and comprehensive view of the mathematical sciences that is fruitful for understanding contemporary science. In Cassirer’s first systematic work, Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff, the mathematical sciences are understood through the concept of function. This implies that scientific investigation aims at increased unity in a system of functional concepts, rather than at answering the substance-rooted question of what is. In his mature work, Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Cassirer expands his inquiry to diverse notions of objects and principles of symbolic forming, recognizing the mathematical sciences as one of many ways of structuring experience, alongside other symbolic forms such as myth and ordinary language. Together, Cassirer’s early and mature works detail the preconditions and idiosyncrasies of the unfolding of scientific objects and situate the mathematical sciences within the totality of human experience. Applying these insights to contemporary interpretations of science suggests connecting common misconceptions of science to challenges in translating objects between symbolic forms. I propose the concepts of domestication and mythification of science as instructive for clearing up such misunderstandings.","PeriodicalId":45310,"journal":{"name":"CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Gerontological difference: Tracing the ontological generativity of aging after Heidegger 老年学差异：追溯海德格尔之后衰老的本体论生成性

IF 0.8 3区哲学

CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1007/s11007-024-09638-2

Rasmus Dyring

{"title":"Gerontological difference: Tracing the ontological generativity of aging after Heidegger","authors":"Rasmus Dyring","doi":"10.1007/s11007-024-09638-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-024-09638-2","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to raise the question of aging as an ontological question. In critical dialogue with Heidegger’s exploration of the question of being, the first half of the paper argues that fundamental ontology, due to the way it relies on a methodological operationalization of the ontological difference, will remain blind to the ontological generativity of the differences that aging makes. I introduce the term gerontological difference as a name for this kind of difference. The second half of the paper explores the quasi-transcendental play of gerontological difference. Drawing on Foucault, Guenther and Agamben, I suggest that this play might be described in archaeological terms by tracing the historical a priori in which age distinctions are operationalized biopolitically. Drawing on Derrida and Nancy, I argue that this archaeological view of the quasi-transcendental play of gerontological difference must be supplemented with a view of aging as material différance. According to this understanding of the quasi-transcendental play of gerontological difference, aging is an ontologically generative event that organizes intercorporeal tangles of coexistence and opens emergent fields of possible experience.","PeriodicalId":45310,"journal":{"name":"CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

From care to solidarity 从关爱到团结

IF 0.8 3区哲学

CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.1007/s11007-024-09640-8

Anne O’Byrne

引用次数: 0

Ageing-in-the-world 老有所为

IF 1.2 3区哲学

CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1007/s11007-024-09630-w

Pascal Massie, Mitchell Staude

引用次数: 0

Care and resentment. An essay on moral temporality 关怀与怨恨道德时间性论文

IF 0.8 3区哲学

CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI: 10.1007/s11007-024-09637-3

Thomas Schwarz Wentzer

{"title":"Care and resentment. An essay on moral temporality","authors":"Thomas Schwarz Wentzer","doi":"10.1007/s11007-024-09637-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-024-09637-3","url":null,"abstract":"Whereas caring is commonly perceived as a moral virtue or a socially beneficial ethical practice, resentment appears to represent its opposite. Advocates of care ethics have vehemently criticized the abstract and aloof nature of traditional ethical theories and argue that care ethics offers a perspective from which we may appreciate interpersonal sensitivity and responsiveness to individuals, per se. Following in the philosophical tradition of Nietzsche and Scheler, resentment—taken as the emotional state of lingering animosity towards individuals, combined with the inclination to withhold assistance and abstain from caring—is often identified as an unjustified and unethical disposition. The paper aims to challenge this perspective and support the moral and historical validity of resentment in specific situations. It thereby recalls a social historical dimension to the often merely physiologically and individually dominated discourse about aging. Drawing on Jean Améry’s seminal account, I suggest viewing resentment as an attitude that asserts the authority to reevaluate the historical situation and to challenge the primacy of immediate needs (the here-and-now of a person in need of care). From this perspective, resentment too displays sensitivity to individuals and their life stories, yet it invokes a sense of justice that exceeds the temporal framework of caring if restrained to bodily and physiological needs. To illustrate this argument, this paper recounts an incident in a nursing home in postwar Germany, in 1986.","PeriodicalId":45310,"journal":{"name":"CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141570805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Continuity in Leibniz and Deleuze: A reading of Difference and Repetition and The Fold 莱布尼茨和德勒兹的连续性：差异与重复》和《折叠》的解读

IF 0.8 3区哲学

CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI: 10.1007/s11007-024-09636-4

Hamed Movahedi

{"title":"Continuity in Leibniz and Deleuze: A reading of Difference and Repetition and The Fold","authors":"Hamed Movahedi","doi":"10.1007/s11007-024-09636-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-024-09636-4","url":null,"abstract":"The status of continuity in Deleuze’s metaphysics is a subject of debate. Deleuze calls the virtual, in Difference and Repetition, an Ideal continuum, and the differential relations that constitute the Ideal imply the continuity of this field. But, Deleuze does not hesitate to formulate the same field by the affirmation of divergence (incompossibility) that can be regarded as a form of discontinuity. It is, hence, unclear how these two ostensibly contradictory accounts might reconcile. This article attempts to reconstitute a Deleuzian theory of continuity through Leibniz, whose philosophy is equally subject to a tension between the law of continuity, prevalent in his mathematics and metaphysics, and the discontinuity or absolute individuality of monads. By reorienting The Fold around the motif of continuity a new conceptual space is opened for continuity qua heterogeneity-and-inseparability. Then, enfolding the conceptual personae of The Fold onto Difference and Repetition reveals the tacit though decisive presence of different types of continuity operational in Deleuze’s metaphysics that will be called divergent, intensive, torsional, and tenorsional continuities.","PeriodicalId":45310,"journal":{"name":"CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141504250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

John Rogove and Pietro D’Oriano (eds.), Heidegger and his anglo-american reception: a comprehensive approach, cham: Springer Nature, 2022, 390 pp., ISBN: 978-3-031-05816-5 John Rogove 和 Pietro D'Oriano（编），《海德格尔及其英美接受：一种综合方法》，湛江：Springer Nature, 2022, 390 pp.

IF 0.8 3区哲学

CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1007/s11007-024-09641-7

Mark Tanzer

引用次数: 0

Karl Löwith on the I–thou relation and interpersonal proximity 卡尔-洛维茨（Karl Löwith）谈 "我-你 "关系和人际亲近感

IF 0.8 3区哲学

CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1007/s11007-024-09632-8

Felipe León

{"title":"Karl Löwith on the I–thou relation and interpersonal proximity","authors":"Felipe León","doi":"10.1007/s11007-024-09632-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-024-09632-8","url":null,"abstract":"Current research on second-person relations has often overlooked that this is not a new topic. Addressed mostly under the heading of the “I–thou relation,” second-person relations were discussed by central figures of the phenomenological tradition, including Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger, but also quite extensively by much lesser-known authors, such as Karl Löwith, Ludwig Binswanger, and Semyon L. Frank, whose work has been undeservedly neglected in current research. This paper starts off by arguing that, in spite of the rightly acknowledged differences between the Husserlian and the Heideggerian approaches to the investigation of the social world, both approaches converge in the claim that the I–thou relation is founded on more basic forms of sociality. In a second step, against the background of Frank’s and Binswanger’s challenges to that claim, I argue that Löwith’s proposal that the I–thou relation is a primordial form of sociality can be vindicated by conceptualizing I–thou relations as close personal relationships (paradigmatically exemplified by companion friendships and romantic partnerships). After assessing how Löwith’s approach to the I–thou relation stands vis-à-vis Heidegger’s and Husserl’s views, I conclude by suggesting how Löwith’s approach can contribute to current research on second-person relations.","PeriodicalId":45310,"journal":{"name":"CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141504251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0