发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Canadian Journal of Law and Society最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
CLS volume 36 issue 3 Cover and Front matter CLS第36卷第3期封面和封面问题
IF 0.7
Canadian Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1017/cls.2021.38
Dominique Bernier, Jula Hughes, Thomas McMorrow
{"title":"CLS volume 36 issue 3 Cover and Front matter","authors":"Dominique Bernier, Jula Hughes, Thomas McMorrow","doi":"10.1017/cls.2021.38","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2021.38","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45293,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46111570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Marginal Citizens: Interracial intimacies and the incarceration of Japanese Canadians, 1942–1949 边缘公民：种族间的亲密关系和日裔加拿大人的监禁，1942-1949
IF 0.7
Canadian Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2021-09-08 DOI: 10.1017/cls.2021.18
M. Vallianatos
{"title":"Marginal Citizens: Interracial intimacies and the incarceration of Japanese Canadians, 1942–1949","authors":"M. Vallianatos","doi":"10.1017/cls.2021.18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2021.18","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Following Japan’s 1941 attacks on Hawai’i and Hong Kong, Canada relocated, detained, and exiled citizens and residents of Japanese ancestry. Many interracial families, however, were exempted from this racial project called the internment. The form of the exemption was an administrative permit granted to its holder on the basis of their marital or patrilineal proximity to whiteness. This article analyzes these permits relying on archival research and applying a critical race feminist lens to explore how law was constitutive of race at this moment in Canadian history. I argue that the permits recategorized interracial intimacies towards two racial ends: to differentiate the citizen from the “enemy alien”; and to regulate the interracial family according to patriarchal common law principles. This article nuances received narratives of law as an instrument of racial exclusion by documenting the way in which a new inclusive state measure sustained old exclusions.","PeriodicalId":45293,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43691215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Shifting Pendulum: Foreign Investors’ Liability Under Canada’s Common Law for Breaches of Customary International Law 摇摆不定：加拿大普通法下外国投资者违反习惯国际法的责任
IF 0.7
Canadian Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2021-09-08 DOI: 10.1017/cls.2021.11
Jason Haynes
{"title":"The Shifting Pendulum: Foreign Investors’ Liability Under Canada’s Common Law for Breaches of Customary International Law","authors":"Jason Haynes","doi":"10.1017/cls.2021.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2021.11","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In February 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered a decision—Nevsun Resources Ltd. v. Araya, 2020 SCC 5—that can properly be described as revolutionary. In Nevsun, the court found that a Canadian corporation operating in a host state, Eretria, could be liable under Canadian domestic law for human rights abuses committed in Eritrea under customary international law, as incorporated into Canadian domestic law. The decision merits special attention because it is likely to fundamentally change the relationship between foreign investors, host states and the residents of host states adversely affected by investors’ unlawful conduct which amount to modern slavery.","PeriodicalId":45293,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47203831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
La Loi sur la laïcité de l’État et les conditions de la fondation juridique d’un modèle interculturel au Québec 关于国家世俗主义的法律和魁北克跨文化模式法律基础的条件
IF 0.7
Canadian Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.1017/cls.2021.19
Louis-Philippe Lampron
{"title":"La Loi sur la laïcité de l’État et les conditions de la fondation juridique d’un modèle interculturel au Québec","authors":"Louis-Philippe Lampron","doi":"10.1017/cls.2021.19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2021.19","url":null,"abstract":"Résumé L’interculturalisme québécois est un modèle de gestion de la diversité culturelle et religieuse qui, pour plusieurs, se distinguerait du multiculturalisme à la canadienne et ferait l’objet d’un large consensus au sein de la population québécoise. Résolument pluraliste, ce modèle distinct de gestion de la diversité aurait pu être opérationnalisé juridiquement dans le cadre constitutionnel canadien avant l’adoption de la Loi sur la laïcité de l’État. Or, le processus suivi par le gouvernement québécois pour faire adopter cette dernière, le 16 juin 2019, et tenter d’éviter que sa constitutionnalité puisse être contestée devant les tribunaux canadiens rend très difficile – voire impossible – la fondation juridique de l’interculturalisme québécois dans le contexte actuel.","PeriodicalId":45293,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45196029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Formalizing Secularism as a Regime of Restrictions and Protections: The Case of Quebec (Canada) and Geneva (Switzerland) 将世俗主义正式化为一种限制和保护的制度:魁北克(加拿大)和日内瓦(瑞士)的案例
IF 0.7
Canadian Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.1017/cls.2021.16
Amélie Barras
{"title":"Formalizing Secularism as a Regime of Restrictions and Protections: The Case of Quebec (Canada) and Geneva (Switzerland)","authors":"Amélie Barras","doi":"10.1017/cls.2021.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2021.16","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 2019, the province of Quebec and the canton of Geneva passed bills establishing their states as “secular.” While each law is, to a certain extent, context specific, both present noteworthy similarities. First, neutrality (the cornerstone of laïcité) is articulated around two elements: (1) restrictions that affect the religious practices of public servants belonging to minority religions and (2) protections for Christian symbols constructed as “cultural.” The article questions the implications for inclusive citizenship of formalizing regulatory regimes that differentiate between “religion” and “culture.” Second, a comparative lens enables an analysis of how, through whom, and why similar regimes of regulation travel from one area of the world to another. The article argues for the importance of considering transnational influences when analyzing the regulation of religion to better (1) understand why particular models of secularism gain traction and (2) capture power dynamics structuring these processes of traction.","PeriodicalId":45293,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42252991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Voting on Belonging 归属投票
IF 0.7
Canadian Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.1017/cls.2021.17
Diana Dabby
{"title":"Voting on Belonging","authors":"Diana Dabby","doi":"10.1017/cls.2021.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2021.17","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 2017, a Muslim cemetery project was proposed in the municipality of St-Apollinaire, just outside Quebec City. This proposal required a change in local zoning, which necessitated approval from citizens living around the targeted plot of land, through the use of diverse deliberative tools. Drawing on a small-scale empirical study conducted in 2017–2018 with key informants in the cemetery project, this article investigates how these actors lived through, engaged with, and operated within the bounds of law. To do this, I suggest employing a legal consciousness framework to examine how local life is also where everyday lived law occurs. The local governance of diversity in death thus requires a re-evaluation of the “local,” identity politics, relationships, and legal consciousness. Ultimately, this article proposes that local decision-making processes play an important yet underexamined role in the broader conversations on belonging.","PeriodicalId":45293,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44280876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Our Culture, Our Heritage, Our Values: Whose Culture, Whose Heritage, Whose Values? 我们的文化，我们的遗产，我们的价值观：谁的文化，谁的遗产，谁的价值观？
IF 0.7
Canadian Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.1017/cls.2021.14
Lori G. Beaman
{"title":"Our Culture, Our Heritage, Our Values: Whose Culture, Whose Heritage, Whose Values?","authors":"Lori G. Beaman","doi":"10.1017/cls.2021.14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2021.14","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reflects on the question of how culture and religion enter legal cases and public debates about the place of majoritarian religious symbols in diverse societies that have some democratic will to inclusion. In the context of the new diversity, the article considers how the articulation of “our culture and heritage” as a strategy for preserving “formerly” religious symbols and practices in public spaces excludes particular groups from the narrative of who “we” are as a nation. The reader is invited to consider how challenges to such symbols and practices might be articulated as a challenge to privilege and power and that a refusal to acknowledge those power relations puts the reputation of democracy and human rights at risk.","PeriodicalId":45293,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42266031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
L’effacement de la laïcité libérale en France. De la séparation du politique et du religieux vers la promotion du « vivre‑ensemble » 法国自由世俗主义的消亡。从政治和宗教分离到促进“共同生活”
IF 0.7
Canadian Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.1017/cls.2021.15
V. Valentin
{"title":"L’effacement de la laïcité libérale en France. De la séparation du politique et du religieux vers la promotion du « vivre‑ensemble »","authors":"V. Valentin","doi":"10.1017/cls.2021.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2021.15","url":null,"abstract":"Résumé Depuis plusieurs décennies, la laïcité subit en France une transformation profonde qui remet en cause sa dimension libérale. Le principe de séparation du politique et du religieux se dilue au profit de la promotion de la notion récente du « vivre‑ensemble », qui voudrait associer garantie de la liberté religieuse et défense des valeurs républicaines. Ce processus d’érosion s’appuie sur le développement d’une logique concordataire et sur l’émergence d’une conception « communautariste » de la laïcité.","PeriodicalId":45293,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41525048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Convergence culturelle et légistique: pour un modèle québécois d’intégration distinct consacré par une loi-cadre 文化和法律融合:在框架法中确立的独特的魁北克一体化模式
IF 0.7
Canadian Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.1017/cls.2021.21
G. Rousseau
{"title":"Convergence culturelle et légistique: pour un modèle québécois d’intégration distinct consacré par une loi-cadre","authors":"G. Rousseau","doi":"10.1017/cls.2021.21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2021.21","url":null,"abstract":"Résumé Suite à la loi 101, la Politique québécoise du développement culturel a visé à faire en sorte que la culture québécoise soit commune à tous et puisse s’enrichir d’apports en provenance des minorités culturelles. Puis, divers écrits ont contribué à faire évoluer le concept de convergence culturelle, à le critiquer ou à répondre à ceux qui le critiquent. À la lumière de cette politique et de ces écrits, on peut associer ce concept à sept principes : lien consubstantiel entre la langue française et la culture québécoise, impératif de la préservation du statut majoritaire de la culture québécoise et de la langue française, refus de l’assimilation des minorités culturelles, intégration, appropriation identitaire, mixité, et rôle vital des œuvres et productions artistiques. Reprenant ces principes et respectant certains critères de la légistique (clarté, cohérence, concision, véracité), le présent article propose le texte d’une loi-cadre sur la convergence culturelle, et la situe théoriquement.","PeriodicalId":45293,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44490379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Introduction 介绍
IF 0.7
Canadian Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.1017/cls.2021.29
Diana Dabby, David Koussens
{"title":"Introduction","authors":"Diana Dabby, David Koussens","doi":"10.1017/cls.2021.29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2021.29","url":null,"abstract":"Since 2010, there has been a noted increase in actions that seek to defend and contest religious rights. [...]these tendencies, often resonant at the local level, can also hold important sway when considering the large-scale regulation of religious diversity. On the one hand, parliamentary discussions were curtailed by government, which chose to limit representations by the public and interested parties at the time of hearings before the Commission of institutions (Commission des institutions);the parliamentary process was further truncated by the government’s decision to invoke closure of the bill, which ultimately resulted in incomplete discussion on the various articles (and amendments) contained in the legislative proposal. 8 On the other hand, the provincial government’s decision to employ the notwithstanding clauses, 9 to immunize the law (and government) against legal challenges to religious and equality rights contained in both the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 10 and the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, 11 indicates a troubling choice to employ public law instruments to curb constitutionally protected identity-based rights. [...]democracy” varies greatly in this context, protecting some rights to the detriment of others, as well as creating a new normative framework which is not only imbued with meaning, but also brings with it binding obligations. [...]readers may also notice an interesting gender divide—whereas the English language articles are written by three female academics, the French language articles are written by five male academics.","PeriodicalId":45293,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43127845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信