发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Journal of Legal Analysis最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Law as hegemonic medium: how the state authors the people it claims to serve 作为霸权媒介的法律：国家如何塑造它声称要服务的人民
IF 2.2 1区 社会学
Journal of Legal Analysis Pub Date : 2026-10-14 DOI: 10.1093/jla/laag009
{"title":"Law as hegemonic medium: how the state authors the people it claims to serve","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/jla/laag009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laag009","url":null,"abstract":"<span class=\"paragraphSection\">Socio-legal scholarship asks how law regulates identities. It rarely asks where the foundational identity of constitutional democracy, the people itself, comes from. I argue that the people lives two distinct lives: as a democratic agent constituted through law, and as an imagined community. Drawing on sociological neo-institutionalism alongside Laclau and Mouffe’s, I show that the imagined community is an unstable settlement of a hegemonic struggle among popular imaginaries, within which the state occupies a structurally privileged position. Through the cases of Hungary, Czechia, and Ukraine, I demonstrate how law sustains constitutional orders whose formal inclusiveness coexists with substantive hegemonic closure.</span>","PeriodicalId":45189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Analysis","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149221558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Our ancient adolescent adversary system” “我们古老的青少年对抗系统”
IF 2.2 1区 社会学
Journal of Legal Analysis Pub Date : 2026-10-14 DOI: 10.1093/jla/laag008
{"title":"“Our ancient adolescent adversary system”","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/jla/laag008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laag008","url":null,"abstract":"<span class=\"paragraphSection\">This article reconstructs the overlooked history of how the adversary system became part of American legal identity. Contrary to conventional accounts, it argues that although the conception of the adversary system as a defining and celebrated feature of American law originated in nineteenth-century legal thought, it was first adopted by the Supreme Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Watts v Indiana</span> (1949) and became widely established only after <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Gideon v Wainwright</span> (1963). Drawing on Supreme Court Justice papers, judicial opinions, legal commentary, and newspapers, it traces this development and situates it within the legacies of Nazism, Nuremberg, the Cold War, the Civil Rights Movement, the Warren Court, and the law and order movement, revealing the historical contingency of American legal identity.</span>","PeriodicalId":45189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Analysis","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149221500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Automated private enforcement: evidence from the Google Fonts Case 自动私人执法：谷歌字体案的证据
IF 2.2 1区 社会学
Journal of Legal Analysis Pub Date : 2026-07-23 DOI: 10.1093/jla/laag006
{"title":"Automated private enforcement: evidence from the Google Fonts Case","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/jla/laag006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laag006","url":null,"abstract":"<span class=\"paragraphSection\">Plaintiffs often lack incentive to enforce low-value claims, weakening defendants' compliance incentives. The Google Fonts Case offers a unique opportunity to explore whether automated private enforcement increases compliance. After a German court ruled that dynamically embedding Google Fonts violated the GDPR, an Austrian lawyer reportedly used automated tools to detect violations and threaten lawsuits. Using a difference-in-differences approach on a two-year sample of 1,517,429 websites across 32 countries, we find a significant compliance effect in Austria: non-compliance dropped by 22.7 percentage points within three months, a nearly 50% reduction. These findings suggest automated enforcement can be disruptive, pressuring policymakers to recalibrate legal rules.</span>","PeriodicalId":45189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Analysis","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149221553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mitigating the judicial human–AI fairness gap 缩小司法上人类与人工智能的公平差距
IF 2.2 1区 社会学
Journal of Legal Analysis Pub Date : 2026-07-23 DOI: 10.1093/jla/laag007
{"title":"Mitigating the judicial human–AI fairness gap","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/jla/laag007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laag007","url":null,"abstract":"<span class=\"paragraphSection\">Machine adjudication is perceived as less fair than human judging. We study whether hybrid procedures, in which a human consults an algorithmic recommendation but retains final authority, mitigate this human-AI fairness gap. In two experiments ($N = 7{,}651$), participants evaluate sentencing, bail, and arbitration decisions made by a human, an algorithm, or a human reviewing an algorithmic recommendation. The hybrid procedure eliminates the gap even when human scrutiny is minimal. The effect is complete among White and conservative participants but partial among Black liberals. Insensitivity to review intensity raises the risk of human-washing: nominal oversight may legitimize substantively flawed algorithmic processes.</span>","PeriodicalId":45189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Analysis","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149221502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is originalism orthodoxy? 原旨主义是正统的吗？
IF 2.2 1区 社会学
Journal of Legal Analysis Pub Date : 2026-07-23 DOI: 10.1093/jla/laag001
{"title":"Is originalism orthodoxy?","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/jla/laag001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laag001","url":null,"abstract":"<span class=\"paragraphSection\">What theory of constitutional interpretation has the Supreme Court followed? We search Supreme Court opinions for a wide range of sources that originalists identify as central to their methodology, over the entire universe of cases beginning in 1791. We find that for much of Supreme Court history, conventional indicators of originalist practice—citations to Founding-era sources—are largely absent, raising questions about originalism’s past orthodoxy. Originalist citation practices are absent for much of the 19th century and grow sharply in the late 20th century. The Article elaborates the implications of these findings for debates in constitutional law.</span>","PeriodicalId":45189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Analysis","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149221501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Constitutionalism and majoritarianism reconciled 立宪主义和多数主义和解
IF 2.2 1区 社会学
Journal of Legal Analysis Pub Date : 2026-05-25 DOI: 10.1093/jla/laag004
{"title":"Constitutionalism and majoritarianism reconciled","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/jla/laag004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laag004","url":null,"abstract":"<span class=\"paragraphSection\">This paper defends the view that both constitutional provisions—norms that are not dependent on our choices—and statutory provisions—norms that are contingent on our choices—are necessary features of a liberal democracy. We make the case for <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">institution-dependent goods</span>, arguing that some goods depend for their existence on being produced by the right law-making institution with its own characteristic deliberative process. Hence, we conclude that individuals may sometimes have an interest (or even a right) that their legal rights be protected by a certain institution, say, the legislature, rather than another, say, the constitution, and vice versa.</span>","PeriodicalId":45189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Analysis","volume":"215 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149221475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Steering, subversion, and parents’ rights 引导，颠覆，和父母的权利
IF 2.2 1区 社会学
Journal of Legal Analysis Pub Date : 2026-05-24 DOI: 10.1093/jla/laag005
{"title":"Steering, subversion, and parents’ rights","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/jla/laag005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laag005","url":null,"abstract":"<span class=\"paragraphSection\">Should parental rights block state efforts to influence parenting or frustrate parental goals? Using examples of public-school-opt-out denials and non-disclosure of a child’s gender expression as examples, I argue they should not. When parents harm children or society, governments may steer parents or subvert parental aims. The article considers and rejects claims that steering and subversion lack neutral justification, corrupt parental decision-making, facilitate abuse of state power, or undermine the values of intimacy and nurturing that parental rights are meant to protect. It also reframes parental rights as claim rights against state coercion, but as privileges against children.</span>","PeriodicalId":45189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Analysis","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149221476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AI for scaling legal reform: mapping and redacting racial covenants in Santa Clara County 扩大法律改革的人工智能：绘制和修订圣克拉拉县的种族契约
IF 2.2 1区 社会学
Journal of Legal Analysis Pub Date : 2026-05-24 DOI: 10.1093/jla/laaf005
{"title":"AI for scaling legal reform: mapping and redacting racial covenants in Santa Clara County","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/jla/laaf005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laaf005","url":null,"abstract":"<span class=\"paragraphSection\">Legal reform can be challenging due to the volume, complexity, and interdependence of laws, codes, and records. One salient example is racially restrictive covenants. In 2021, California mandated that counties identify and redact such covenants, but implementation has proved challenging, with 84 million pages in Santa Clara County (SCC) alone. Through a partnership with SCC, we develop an open, accurate, and fast language model-based pipeline to solve this problem. Our model is deployable elsewhere with minimal resources, fundamentally altering the cost-benefit calculus of such policy reform. We estimate <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">one in three</span> SCC properties were subject to racial covenants in 1950.</span>","PeriodicalId":45189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Analysis","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149221477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Section 2 of the voting rights act and native representation 投票权法案第二节和本地代表制
IF 2.2 1区 社会学
Journal of Legal Analysis Pub Date : 2026-05-13 DOI: 10.1093/jla/laag003
{"title":"Section 2 of the voting rights act and native representation","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/jla/laag003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laag003","url":null,"abstract":"<span class=\"paragraphSection\">We have undertaken the first systematic, cross-state investigation of the relationship between Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and Native representation. Though it is not necessary for Native representation, Section 2 remains an important contributor. It also contributes to the packing of Native voters: safe Section 2 districts—in which Native voters constitute a majority—decrease Native influence in surrounding districts. We provide novel empirical support for a longstanding critique of Section 2’s focus on minority ability to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">elect</span>, not their <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">influence</span>. Because Native communities have relatively small populations, the focus on electability can impose especially harsh trade-offs on influence.</span>","PeriodicalId":45189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Analysis","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149221523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What do we need from an account of lex talionis? A response to Lewis 我们需要从lex talionis的叙述中得到什么？对刘易斯的回应
IF 2.2 1区 社会学
Journal of Legal Analysis Pub Date : 2026-05-13 DOI: 10.1093/jla/laag002
{"title":"What do we need from an account of lex talionis? A response to Lewis","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/jla/laag002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laag002","url":null,"abstract":"<span class=\"paragraphSection\">This paper is a response to Christopher Lewis’s recent paper on lex talionis. I claim that Lewis’s interpretation cannot answer some of the questions that it needs to. In particular, we need to understand what our fundamental motivation is for subscribing to a principle of proportionality in the first place. Facing this kind of question head on is the only way to rehabilitate the principle of lex talionis—if indeed, it merits rehabilitation.</span>","PeriodicalId":45189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Analysis","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149221478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书