发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Revolutionizing the Human Sciences: A Response to Wiebe 革新人文科学:对韦博的回应
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Pub Date : 2020-07-28 DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341498
Jason Ānanda Josephson Storm
{"title":"Revolutionizing the Human Sciences: A Response to Wiebe","authors":"Jason Ānanda Josephson Storm","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341498","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341498","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000In this short response, Storm challenges the limitations of the academic manifesto as a genre, criticizes tendencies toward a naive view of science in the study of religion, and gestures instead at the need for a comprehensive revolution in the human sciences.","PeriodicalId":44982,"journal":{"name":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","volume":"-1 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2020-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700682-12341498","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48999881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Religion, Politics, History, and Culture 宗教、政治、历史和文化
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Pub Date : 2020-07-28 DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341496
T. Fitzgerald
{"title":"Religion, Politics, History, and Culture","authors":"T. Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341496","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341496","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000In his critique of my 2007 monograph Discourse on Civility and Barbarity: a Critical History of Religion and Related Categories, Daniel Miller attributes me with the error of transcendental historicism and an illusion of cultural authenticity. Miller’s challenge leads me to the question ‘what is history?’—what does it mean to be ‘in history’, or to be ‘out of history’, or to be a ‘historical agent’? I also defend myself against the charge of cultural essentialism by questioning the essentially empty term ‘culture’. First, though, I challenge Miller for his continual insistence that my work is ‘political’. Miller seems to accept at least some aspects of my critique of ‘religion’. However, he does not mention that DCB is as much concerned with the invention of a noun word discourse on ‘politics’ as it is with the invention of ‘religion’. ‘Politics’ and the ‘nation state’ were invented by men of substantial property ambitions to organise, normalise and protect male private property accumulation. Rather than being the foundation of our democratic rights, a gateway to equality and emancipation, ‘politics’ promotes and globally facilitates the processes of ‘accumulation by dispossession’.","PeriodicalId":44982,"journal":{"name":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","volume":"32 1","pages":"386-422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2020-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700682-12341496","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47945062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Is There a Difference Between “Religion” and “Politics”? “宗教”和“政治”之间有区别吗？
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Pub Date : 2020-07-24 DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341494
L. Smith
{"title":"Is There a Difference Between “Religion” and “Politics”?","authors":"L. Smith","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341494","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341494","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Scholars commonly compare and distinguish “religion” and “politics” in their analyses of certain social groups; they often do so in a way that presumes that such terms denote complicated yet still discrete realms that exist in varying degrees of interrelationship. Using the Christian Right as a case study, this essay proposes that we can draw from Bruce Lincoln and Oliver Freiberger’s insights regarding the methodological uses of comparison to reconsider how the terms “religion” and “politics” are deployed in our analyses. Rather than view these concepts as mirrors of some objective reality, scholars can create more robust critical perspectives if they treat these terms as insider products—that is, as flexible rhetorical categories modified by group insiders to achieve certain social effects.","PeriodicalId":44982,"journal":{"name":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","volume":"32 1","pages":"442-454"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700682-12341494","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44242529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
By Way of Response 作为回应
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Pub Date : 2020-07-24 DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341493
B. Lincoln
{"title":"By Way of Response","authors":"B. Lincoln","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341493","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341493","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000In response to the other articles in this issue, the author stresses the need to compare concrete examples, rather than general categories and reflects on the ethical problems arising from his earlier discussion of Edward Hunt’s published variant of Acoma myth, a text that Acoma tribal authorities reject and consider a betrayal of their traditions and authority.","PeriodicalId":44982,"journal":{"name":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700682-12341493","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42102366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Modest Reply to Timothy Fitzgerald 给蒂莫西·菲茨杰拉德的谦虚答复
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Pub Date : 2020-07-23 DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341500
Daniel D. Miller
{"title":"A Modest Reply to Timothy Fitzgerald","authors":"Daniel D. Miller","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341500","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341500","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000A reply to Timothy Fitzgerald’s “Religion, politics, history, and culture: A critical response to Daniel Miller” (2014).","PeriodicalId":44982,"journal":{"name":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","volume":"32 1","pages":"423-433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2020-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700682-12341500","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45483482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Religious Predisposition 宗教倾向
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Pub Date : 2020-07-23 DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341504
J. Bronkhorst
{"title":"The Religious Predisposition","authors":"J. Bronkhorst","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341504","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341504","url":null,"abstract":"This article first predicts, on the basis of an analysis of deep absorption, a number of features of mystical and related states of consciousness. It then observes that these very same features appear in beliefs held by people who have never experienced deep absorption. Moreover, many people engage in activities that, though not normally leading to deep absorption, bring about lesser states of absorption. The article will propose an answer to the question how it is that many people are influenced in their beliefs and practices by experiences (deep absorption) they have not had.","PeriodicalId":44982,"journal":{"name":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","volume":"-1 1","pages":"1-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2020-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700682-12341504","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49236378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Memoirs of an Academic Rōnin: Religious Studies and Mentorship in the Age of Post-Truth 一位学者的回忆录：后真理时代的宗教研究与导师制
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Pub Date : 2020-07-14 DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341495
Leonardo Ambasciano
{"title":"Memoirs of an Academic Rōnin: Religious Studies and Mentorship in the Age of Post-Truth","authors":"Leonardo Ambasciano","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341495","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341495","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000The present article offers a selection of recollections about the author’s professional relationship with his mentor during his cursus studiorum as a graduate student and as a Ph.D. candidate. These memories are preceded by a series of critical reflections on the current state of both Religious Studies and the History of Religions, with a comparative focus on the 1960 scientific mandate of the International Association for the History of Religions (IAHR) and the UK institutional conflation of Theology and Religious Studies (TRS) through the lenses of the early and pioneering Italian experience.\u0000Hopefully, these notes will also prompt a much-needed frank conversation on such delicate topics.","PeriodicalId":44982,"journal":{"name":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700682-12341495","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46353177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Distinguishing Our Object of Study: “Religious” but not “Religion” 区分我们的研究对象：“宗教”而非“宗教”
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Pub Date : 2020-07-13 DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341502
Vaia Touna
{"title":"Distinguishing Our Object of Study: “Religious” but not “Religion”","authors":"Vaia Touna","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341502","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341502","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000A response to Donald Wiebe’s Manifesto.","PeriodicalId":44982,"journal":{"name":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700682-12341502","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49548367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A Point by Point Response to Donald Wiebe: A Manifesto for the Scientific Study of Religion 对唐纳德·韦博的逐点回应:宗教科学研究的宣言
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Pub Date : 2020-07-13 DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341497
J. Jensen
{"title":"A Point by Point Response to Donald Wiebe: A Manifesto for the Scientific Study of Religion","authors":"J. Jensen","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341497","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341497","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000A point by point response to Wiebe’s ‘Manifesto’, mostly in support of the ‘methodological naturalism’—with added precautions on the current use of the term ‘science’. A philosophy for the study of religion is called for, with an epistemological range that caters for collective methodologies and social ontologies; respects the analytic distinction between ‘subject matter’ and ‘theoretical object’—and, ultimately, the theory-ladenness of all talk about ‘religion’. Naturalism is not about givens in the study of meaningful human behavior.","PeriodicalId":44982,"journal":{"name":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700682-12341497","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48485506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Scientific Study of Religion: A Very Brief Reply to Donald Wiebe 宗教科学研究——对唐纳德·维贝的一个很简短的答复
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Pub Date : 2020-07-09 DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341499
Nancy K. Levene
{"title":"The Scientific Study of Religion: A Very Brief Reply to Donald Wiebe","authors":"Nancy K. Levene","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341499","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341499","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000A response to Donald Wiebe’s call for a scientific study of religion.","PeriodicalId":44982,"journal":{"name":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","volume":"-1 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2020-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700682-12341499","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49458961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信