A Point by Point Response to Donald Wiebe: A Manifesto for the Scientific Study of Religion

IF 0.5 2区哲学 0 RELIGION

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Pub Date : 2020-07-13 DOI:10.1163/15700682-12341497

J. Jensen

引用次数: 1

Abstract

A point by point response to Wiebe’s ‘Manifesto’, mostly in support of the ‘methodological naturalism’—with added precautions on the current use of the term ‘science’. A philosophy for the study of religion is called for, with an epistemological range that caters for collective methodologies and social ontologies; respects the analytic distinction between ‘subject matter’ and ‘theoretical object’—and, ultimately, the theory-ladenness of all talk about ‘religion’. Naturalism is not about givens in the study of meaningful human behavior.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对唐纳德·韦博的逐点回应:宗教科学研究的宣言

对韦博“宣言”的逐条回应，主要是支持“方法论自然主义”，并对当前“科学”一词的使用增加了预防措施。需要一种研究宗教的哲学，其认识论范围迎合了集体方法论和社会本体论;尊重“主题”和“理论对象”之间的分析区别，并最终尊重所有关于“宗教”的讨论的理论内涵。自然主义不是关于有意义的人类行为的研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion RELIGION-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Method & Theory in the Study of Religion publishes articles, notes, book reviews and letters which explicitly address the problems of methodology and theory in the academic study of religion. This includes such traditional points of departure as history, philosophy, anthropology and sociology, but also the natural sciences, and such newer disciplinary approaches as feminist theory and studies. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion also concentrates on the critical analysis of theoretical problems prominent in the study of religion.