By Way of Response

IF 0.5 2区哲学 0 RELIGION

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Pub Date : 2020-07-24 DOI:10.1163/15700682-12341493

B. Lincoln

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to the other articles in this issue, the author stresses the need to compare concrete examples, rather than general categories and reflects on the ethical problems arising from his earlier discussion of Edward Hunt’s published variant of Acoma myth, a text that Acoma tribal authorities reject and consider a betrayal of their traditions and authority.

查看原文本刊更多论文

作为回应

在回应本期其他文章时，作者强调需要比较具体的例子，而不是一般的类别，并反思了他早期讨论爱德华·亨特出版的阿科马神话变体所产生的伦理问题，阿科马部落当局拒绝并认为该文本背叛了他们的传统和权威。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion RELIGION-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Method & Theory in the Study of Religion publishes articles, notes, book reviews and letters which explicitly address the problems of methodology and theory in the academic study of religion. This includes such traditional points of departure as history, philosophy, anthropology and sociology, but also the natural sciences, and such newer disciplinary approaches as feminist theory and studies. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion also concentrates on the critical analysis of theoretical problems prominent in the study of religion.