International Journal for Educational Integrity最新文献_第2页

“Out of my control”: science undergraduates report mental health concerns and inconsistent conditions when using remote proctoring software “我无法控制”:理科生在使用远程监控软件时报告了心理健康问题和不一致的情况

International Journal for Educational Integrity Pub Date : 2023-11-15 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-023-00141-4

Annika Pokorny, Cissy J. Ballen, Abby Grace Drake, Emily P. Driessen, Sheritta Fagbodun, Brian Gibbens, Jeremiah A. Henning, Sophie J. McCoy, Seth K. Thompson, Charles G. Willis, A. Kelly Lane

{"title":"“Out of my control”: science undergraduates report mental health concerns and inconsistent conditions when using remote proctoring software","authors":"Annika Pokorny, Cissy J. Ballen, Abby Grace Drake, Emily P. Driessen, Sheritta Fagbodun, Brian Gibbens, Jeremiah A. Henning, Sophie J. McCoy, Seth K. Thompson, Charles G. Willis, A. Kelly Lane","doi":"10.1007/s40979-023-00141-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00141-4","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Efforts to discourage academic misconduct in online learning environments frequently include the use of remote proctoring services. While these services are relatively commonplace in undergraduate science courses, there are open questions about students’ remote assessment environments and their concerns related to remote proctoring services. Using a survey distributed to 11 undergraduate science courses engaging in remote instruction at three American, public, research-focused institutions during the spring of 2021, we found that the majority of undergraduate students reported testing in suboptimal environments. Students’ concerns about remote proctoring services were closely tied to technological difficulties, fear of being wrongfully accused of cheating, and negative impacts on mental health. Our results suggest that remote proctoring services can create and perpetuate inequitable assessment environments for students, and additional research is required to understand the efficacy of their intended purpose to prevent cheating. We also advocate for continued conversations about the broader social and institutional conditions that can pressure students into cheating. While changes to academic culture are difficult, these conversations are necessary for higher education to remain relevant in an increasingly technological world.","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136229385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The temptation to cheat in online exams: moving beyond the binary discourse of cheating and not cheating 在线考试作弊的诱惑:超越作弊和不作弊的二元话语

International Journal for Educational Integrity Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-023-00143-2

Michael Henderson, Jennifer Chung, Rebecca Awdry, Cliff Ashford, Mike Bryant, Matthew Mundy, Kris Ryan

{"title":"The temptation to cheat in online exams: moving beyond the binary discourse of cheating and not cheating","authors":"Michael Henderson, Jennifer Chung, Rebecca Awdry, Cliff Ashford, Mike Bryant, Matthew Mundy, Kris Ryan","doi":"10.1007/s40979-023-00143-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00143-2","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Discussions around assessment integrity often focus on the exam conditions and the motivations and values of those who cheated in comparison with those who did not. We argue that discourse needs to move away from a binary representation of cheating. Instead, we propose that the conversation may be more productive and more impactful by focusing on those who do not cheat, but who are tempted to do so. We conceptualise this group as being at risk of future cheating behaviour and potentially more receptive of targeted strategies to support their integrity decisions. In this paper we report on a large-scale survey of university students ( n = 7,511) who had just completed one or more end of semester online exams. In doing so we explore students’ reported temptation to cheat. Analysis surrounding this “at risk” group reveals students who were Tempted ( n = 1379) had significant differences from those who Cheated ( n = 216) as well as those who were Not tempted ( n = 5916). We focus on four research questions exploring whether there are specific online exam conditions, security settings, student attitudes or perceptions which are more strongly associated with the temptation to cheat. The paper offers insights to help institutions to minimise factors that might lead to breaches of assessment integrity, by focusing on the temptation to cheat during assessment.","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"180 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Welcome to the University of life, can I take your order? Investigating Life Experience Degree Offerings in Diploma mills 欢迎来到生活大学，您要点什么?调查文凭工厂提供的生活经验学位

International Journal for Educational Integrity Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-023-00138-z

Jasper Roe, Mike Perkins

{"title":"Welcome to the University of life, can I take your order? Investigating Life Experience Degree Offerings in Diploma mills","authors":"Jasper Roe, Mike Perkins","doi":"10.1007/s40979-023-00138-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00138-z","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this study, we posit a new category of products provided by diploma mills, which we term Life Experience Degree Offerings (LEDOs). LEDOs uniquely capitalise on the misuse of the principle of Accreditation of Prior Learning (APL) by granting higher education qualifications based on a resume or CV alone. Through a comparative analysis with contract cheating websites, we highlight the key features and persuasive strategies employed by 10 diploma mill websites which provide LEDOs to attract and convince potential clients. We then use corpus linguistics methods by analysing a large corpus of text quantitatively to explore the keywords these websites use to describe their products using a pre-packaged corpus analysis tool (Sketch Engine). Our findings indicate that on providers’ websites, the LEDOs are framed as a tool to achieve greater socioeconomic opportunities, and the quality and appearance of the physical diploma and accompanying documents play a key role in the LEDOs’ value proposition, while references to the acquisition of knowledge and process of learning are absent. Furthermore, LEDOs are typified by the promise of accreditation and verification services, which are the two most common keywords used in the description of LEDOs on diploma mills’ websites. Future research directions are suggested, including examining this phenomenon in non-Western cultural contexts, understanding the users and operators of LEDO websites, and assessing the prevalence of fraudulent credentials obtained from these sites.","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135372478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Evaluating empowerment towards responsible conduct of research in a small private online course 在小型私人在线课程中评估对负责任的研究行为的授权

IF 4.6

International Journal for Educational Integrity Pub Date : 2023-08-15 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-023-00139-y

Mariëtte vd Hoven, H. Mol, R.P.infoeu-repo Verhoeff

引用次数: 0

Evaluating the authenticity of ChatGPT responses: a study on text-matching capabilities 评估ChatGPT回复的真实性：一项关于文本匹配能力的研究

IF 4.6

International Journal for Educational Integrity Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-023-00137-0

Ahmed M. Elkhatat

引用次数: 3

Student perceptions of academic misconduct amongst their peers during the rapid transition to remote instruction 在快速过渡到远程教学期间，学生对同龄人学术不端行为的看法

IF 4.6

International Journal for Educational Integrity Pub Date : 2023-07-17 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-023-00136-1

B. Stoesz, Matthew S. Quesnel, Amy E. De Jaeger

引用次数: 2

Causes and mitigation of academic dishonesty among healthcare students in a Nigerian university 尼日利亚一所大学医疗保健专业学生学术不诚实的原因及缓解措施

IF 4.6

International Journal for Educational Integrity Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-023-00135-2

Edidiong Orok, Funmilayo I. Adeniyi, Tonfamoworio Williams, Oyebode Dosunmu, Favour Ikpe, C. Orakwe, O. Kukoyi

引用次数: 0

Artificial intelligence, text generation tools and ChatGPT – does digital watermarking offer a solution? 人工智能、文本生成工具和ChatGPT——数字水印能提供解决方案吗？

IF 4.6

International Journal for Educational Integrity Pub Date : 2023-06-05 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-023-00131-6

Thomas A. Lancaster

引用次数: 5

Faculty members’ use of artificial intelligence to grade student papers: a case of implications 教师使用人工智能为学生论文评分:一个隐含的案例

IF 4.6

International Journal for Educational Integrity Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-023-00130-7

Rahul Kumar

引用次数: 5

Why they do and why they don’t: a combined criminological approach to understanding assignment outsourcing in higher education 他们为什么这样做和为什么不这样做：理解高等教育任务外包的犯罪学综合方法

IF 4.6

International Journal for Educational Integrity Pub Date : 2023-04-17 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-023-00126-3

R. Awdry, Andrew Groves

引用次数: 0