Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica最新文献_第3页

A dimensão ética da hermenêutica jurídica: repensando o interpretativismo de Ronald Dworkin a partir de Hans-Georg Gadamer 法律解释学的伦理维度:从伽达默尔的角度重新思考罗纳德沃金的解释主义

Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art02-go

Ziel Ferreira Lopes

引用次数: 0

Conceito jurídico indeterminado: análise da utilização do critério do melhor interesse da criança no Recurso Extraordinário nº 888.815/RS 不确定的法律概念:特别上诉中儿童最大利益标准的使用分析nº888.815/RS

Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art07-sp

Jaqueline Bezerra da Silva, Peter Panutto

{"title":"Conceito jurídico indeterminado: análise da utilização do critério do melhor interesse da criança no Recurso Extraordinário nº 888.815/RS","authors":"Jaqueline Bezerra da Silva, Peter Panutto","doi":"10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art07-sp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art07-sp","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to understand, from the notion of indeterminate legal concept of the normative-objective class elaborated by the German professor Karl Engisch, the so-called Best Interest of the Child as a guiding criterion for judicial decisions dealing with the rights and interests of children and adolescents. As a case study, the decision referring to Extraordinary Appeal 888.815/RS that dealt with the possibility of home education in Brazil was analyzed. As a method, there is a qualitative analysis, using documental, bibliographical, and case analysis research. From the analysis of the judgment, it was verified that despite the theme dealing with the rights of children and adolescents, therefore, it is imperative to observe the Best Interest of the Child, only two ministers explained the term in their grounds. Only one of them, in its interpretative exercise, conducted the evaluative filling according to the understanding of the normative-objective concept interpretive exercise proceeded the evaluative filling in accordance with the understanding of the normative-objective concept.","PeriodicalId":448198,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125389528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Pandemia, direito constitucional à saúde e o meio ambiente do trabalho 流行病、宪法健康权和工作环境

Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art10-pr

Aldacy Rachid Coutinho, Luiz Alberto David Araujo

引用次数: 0

Ornitorrinco alexyano: reflexões sobre a importação da teoria dos princípios de Robert Alexy pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal no caso Ellwanger 阿列克谢亚诺:对最高法院在埃尔万格案中引入罗伯特·阿列克谢原则理论的思考

Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art06-es

Alexandre de Castro Coura, Gabriel Antonio Nassif Marx, Thiago Viola Pereira da Silva

{"title":"Ornitorrinco alexyano: reflexões sobre a importação da teoria dos princípios de Robert Alexy pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal no caso Ellwanger","authors":"Alexandre de Castro Coura, Gabriel Antonio Nassif Marx, Thiago Viola Pereira da Silva","doi":"10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art06-es","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art06-es","url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to analyze the performance of the Brazilian Supreme Court in the paradigmatic Ellwanger Case. Initially, the historical evolution of positivism and its contemporary debate is examined, as well as how the material was received in Brazil. Then, there is a brief presentation of Robert Alexy’s Theory of Principles, with the objective of understanding the particularities of its application, in order, finally, to debate possible mistakes in the judgment of Habeas Corpus of n. 82.424-2. In this sense, the article starts from the following question: What was (were) the mistake (s) practiced by the STF in the reception of Robert Alexy’s Theory of Principles in the notorious Ellwanger Case? The methodology applied to face the questioning consists, substantially, in the deductive application of the theories studied in bibliographic researches, when analyzing the aforementioned judgment. It is concluded that the antagonistic votes studied, despite using Alexy’s theoretical contributions, mistakenly received and outlined the theory, aggravating the problem of excessive discretion in judicial decisions in the Brazilian legal system","PeriodicalId":448198,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123840782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

O debate acerca do controle de constitucionalidade incidental nos tribunais de contas: uma análise crítica dos argumentos do Mandado de Segurança 35.410 para a defesa da integridade do direito 关于审计法院附带司法审查的辩论:对第35410号令状中捍卫法律完整性的论点的批判性分析

Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art08-pr

Jonas Faviero Trindade, Caroline Müller Bitencourt

{"title":"O debate acerca do controle de constitucionalidade incidental nos tribunais de contas: uma análise crítica dos argumentos do Mandado de Segurança 35.410 para a defesa da integridade do direito","authors":"Jonas Faviero Trindade, Caroline Müller Bitencourt","doi":"10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art08-pr","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art08-pr","url":null,"abstract":"The incidental constitutional review in the Courts of Counts is debated based on an analysis of arguments present in Writ of Mandamus nº 35410, being heard in the Supreme Court. The question to answer is the following: are brazilian courts of counts constrained by the understandings of the Supreme Court when exercising incidental constitutional review or those ones Courts would not even enjoy the prerogative to exercise that control, based on the critical analysis of the arguments raised in the votes of Writ of Mandamus nº 35.410? The hypothesis raised is that there is a restrictive view, reflected in the arguments extracted from the votes of said Writ of Mandamus, regarding the meaning of constitutionality control as well as its applicable jurisdiction, although incidental, of the exercise of this control by the Courts of Counts. To confirm the hypothesis, we present the selected case and then we propose an analysis of the argumentative framework contained therein. In conclusion, in addition to refuting the arguments contained in the Writ of Mandamus, it is worth noting that the Supreme Court eventually denied the request made by the Courts of Counts to share the constitutional paradigm. The method used was hypothetical deductive, with a case study, starting from Ronald Dworkin’s concept of Law as Integrity.","PeriodicalId":448198,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123340506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

O direito humano à seguridade social e o controle de convencionalidade: análise da reforma da previdência à luz das diretrizes de Maastricht e princípios de Limburgo 社会保障人权与常规控制:马斯特里赫特指导方针与林堡原则下的社会保障改革分析

Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art09-am

Túlio Macedo Rosa e Silva, Vânia Maria do Perpétuo Socorro Marques Marinho, Marília Gurgel Rocha de Paiva e Sales

{"title":"O direito humano à seguridade social e o controle de convencionalidade: análise da reforma da previdência à luz das diretrizes de Maastricht e princípios de Limburgo","authors":"Túlio Macedo Rosa e Silva, Vânia Maria do Perpétuo Socorro Marques Marinho, Marília Gurgel Rocha de Paiva e Sales","doi":"10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art09-am","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art09-am","url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyzes the new social security system, through the prism of the international norms of protection to the human rights and of those that recommend the conventionality control. The general objective of the research is to examine aspects of the social security’s reform, following the Maastricht guidelines and Limburg principles, to assess whether there was a violation of the human right to social security to motivate the respective control of conventionality. The specific objectives are: to analyze the conventionality control and its cogent application in the management of internal norms; outline brief notions about the distinction between constitutionality and conventionality blocks; demonstrate the modalities of conventionality control, the antinomies solution and application of the sources dialogue; and, finally, to examine the implications of the welfare reform regarding the human right to social security. The importance of the theme is revealed by the consequences of a decrease in the coverage of social security in the legal sphere of the brazilian population’s human rights. With descriptive-deductive research method and normative, jurisprudential and bibliographic, the matter is deepened by mentioning the Inter-American Court’s judgments, including the case of Muelle Flores v. Peru, leading case in the pronouncement of the right to social security, as an autonomous right derived from article 26 of the American Convention.","PeriodicalId":448198,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129052085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Velando e desvelando o senso comum na teoria da interpretação jurídica de Kelsen 揭示凯尔森法律解释理论中的常识

Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art03-pa

Alberto de Moraes Papaléo Paes

引用次数: 0

Argumentação jurídica: o modelo de Douglas Walton 法律论证:道格拉斯·沃尔顿模型

Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art04-sp

Júlio César De Aguiar, M. A. Medeiros

引用次数: 0

A margem de apreciação entre o internacional e o nacional: os (des)caminhos hermenêuticos do sistema europeu de direitos humanos 国际与国家之间的自由裁量权:欧洲人权体系的(非)解释学路径

Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art05-rs

Jânia Saldanha

引用次数: 0

Classificação de pronunciamentos judiciais utilizando processamento de linguagem natural 利用自然语言处理对法庭判决进行分类

Revista do Instituto de Hermenêutica Jurídica Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.52028/rihj.v20.i32-art01-sc

Fernando Maurilio Bento, Alexandre Morais da Rosa, Raimundo Celeste Ghizoni Teive

引用次数: 0