Insights-The UKSG Journal最新文献_第8页

Data journals: incentivizing data access and documentation within the scholarly communication system 数据期刊：激励学术交流系统内的数据访问和文档

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2020-06-10 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.510

W. H. Walters

引用次数: 14

The view from Salford: perspectives on scholarly communications from a research-informed university 来自索尔福德的观点:一所研究型大学的学术交流视角

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2020-05-20 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.511

Jennifer Bayjoo, Dominic Broadhurst, D. clay, Emma L. Smith

引用次数: 2

The librarian as academic author: a reflection 图书馆员作为学术作者的思考

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2020-05-13 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.505

H. Fallon

引用次数: 0

Towards inclusive scholarly publishing: developments in the university press community 走向包容性学术出版：大学新闻界的发展

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2020-05-06 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.506

Niccole Leilanionapae‘aina Coggins, G. Fosado, Christie Henry, Gita Manaktala

引用次数: 2

Wikimedia and universities: contributing to the global commons in the Age of Disinformation 维基媒体与大学:为虚假信息时代的全球公域做出贡献

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2020-04-29 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.509

Nick Sheppard, M. Poulter

引用次数: 2

Cancelling with the world’s largest scholarly publisher: lessons from the Swedish experience of having no access to Elsevier 与世界上最大的学术出版商取消合作:瑞典无法访问爱思唯尔的经验教训

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2020-04-22 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.507

Lisa Olsson, C. Lindelöw, Lovisa Österlund, Frida Jakobsson

{"title":"Cancelling with the world’s largest scholarly publisher: lessons from the Swedish experience of having no access to Elsevier","authors":"Lisa Olsson, C. Lindelöw, Lovisa Österlund, Frida Jakobsson","doi":"10.1629/uksg.507","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.507","url":null,"abstract":"This article covers the consequences of the decision of the Bibsam consortium to cancel its journal licence agreement with Elsevier, the world’s largest scholarly publisher, in 2018. First, we report on how the cancellation affected Swedish researchers. Second, we describe other consequences of the cancellation. Finally, we report on lessons for the future. In short, there was no consensus among researchers on how the cancellation affected them or whether the cancellation was positive or negative for them. Just over half (54%) of the 4,221 researchers who responded to a survey indicated that the cancellation had harmed their work, whereas 37% indicated that it had not. Almost half (48%) of the researchers had a negative view of the cancellation, whereas 38% had a positive view. The cancellation highlighted the ongoing work at research libraries to facilitate the transition to an open access publishing system to more stakeholders in academia than before. It also showed that Swedish vice-chancellors were prepared to suspend subscriptions with a publisher that could not accommodate the needs and requirements of open science. Finally, the cancellation resulted in the signing of a transformative agreement which started on 1 January 2020. If it had not been for the cancellation, the reaching of such an agreement would have been unlikely.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42541882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Social engagement and institutional repositories: a case study 社会参与与机构知识库：案例研究

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2020-03-25 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.504

S. Boulton

{"title":"Social engagement and institutional repositories: a case study","authors":"S. Boulton","doi":"10.1629/uksg.504","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.504","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the community reach and societal impact of institutional repositories, in particular Griffith Research Online (GRO), Griffith University’s institutional repository. To promote research on GRO, and to encourage people to click through to the repository content, a pilot social media campaign and some subsequent smaller social media activities were undertaken in 2018. After briefly touching on these campaigns, this article provides some reflections from these activities and proposes options for the future direction of social engagement and GRO in particular, and for institutional repositories in general. This undertaking necessitates a shift in focus from repositories as a resource for the scholarly community to a resource for the community at large. The campaign also highlighted the need to look beyond performance metrics to social media metrics as a measure of the social and community impact of a repository. Whilst the article is written from one Australian university’s perspective, the drivers and challenges behind researchers and universities translating their research into economic, social, environmental and cultural impacts are national and international. The primary takeaway message is for libraries to take more of a proactive stance and to kick-start conversations within their institutions and with their clients to actively partner in creating opportunities to share research.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42044403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

‘Requires proofing by a native speaker’ – colonization and scholarship “需要母语人士的证明”——殖民化和学术

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2020-03-18 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.502

E. Costello

引用次数: 6

UKRR: a collaborative collection management success story UKRR:协作收集管理的成功案例

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2020-03-11 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.503

C. Banks, Theo Stubbs

{"title":"UKRR: a collaborative collection management success story","authors":"C. Banks, Theo Stubbs","doi":"10.1629/uksg.503","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.503","url":null,"abstract":"It is worth noting that all the material in this paper is adapted from, and appears in greater length in, the UKRR Final Report.1 This article summarizes the achievements of the United Kingdom Research Reserve (UKRR) project, which was established in 2007 to explore whether, through collaborative documentation, preservation and deduplication of low-use print journals, it would be possible to realize benefits through the generation of space savings across the UK’s Higher Education libraries. In total, the project received £11,581,672 in funding from HEFCE (now Research England). UKRR was managed by Imperial College London in partnership with the British Library (BL) and between 2007 and 2019, 35 further libraries participated in the project. UKRR ran in three phases and has now transitioned to a service delivered by the BL which is available to libraries across the UK. During all three phases of the project, UKRR supported the processing of nearly 130,000 metres of print journal materials and enabled the release of nearly 98,000 metres of shelf space across the 36 libraries. Print copies of scarce titles were preserved, nearly 10,000 individual journal issues from 8,000 journal titles helped fill gaps in the BL’s own collection and data for over 300,000 individual journal issues was enhanced in the BL’s catalogue. When calculating the capital and recurrent value of the space released amongst the participating libraries, it is estimated that the project delivered £4.04 in savings for every £1.00 of funding received.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43978773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Built to last! Embedding open science principles and practice into European universities 天长地久!将开放科学的原则和实践融入欧洲大学

IF 1.1

Insights-The UKSG Journal Pub Date : 2020-03-04 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.501

Tiberius Ignat, P. Ayris

{"title":"Built to last! Embedding open science principles and practice into European universities","authors":"Tiberius Ignat, P. Ayris","doi":"10.1629/uksg.501","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.501","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to examine the cultural change needed by universities, as identified by LERU in its report Open Science and its role in universities: a roadmap for cultural change.1 It begins by illustrating the nature of that cultural change. Linked to that transformation is a necessary management change to the way in which organizations perform research. Competition is not the only, or necessarily the best, way to conduct this transformation. Open science brings to the fore the values of collaboration and sharing. Building on a number of Focus on Open Science Workshops held over five years across Europe, the article identifies best practice in changing current research practices, which will then contribute to the culture change necessary to deliver open science. Four case studies, delivered at Focus on Open Science Workshops or other conferences in Europe, illustrate the advances that are being made: the findings of a Workshop on Collaboration and Competition at the OAI 11 meeting in Geneva in June 2019; alternative publishing platforms, exemplified by UCL Press; open data, FAIR data and reproducibility; and a Citizen Science Workshop held at the LIBER Conference in Dublin in June 2019.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47541206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11