Journal of Global Security Studies最新文献_第2页

The Political Economy of Australian Militarism: On the Emergent Military–Industrial–Academic Complex 澳大利亚军国主义的政治经济学:论新兴的军事-工业-学术复合体

Journal of Global Security Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI: 10.1093/jogss/ogad018

Sian Troath

{"title":"The Political Economy of Australian Militarism: On the Emergent Military–Industrial–Academic Complex","authors":"Sian Troath","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogad018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogad018","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Australia is undergoing a process of substantial militarization. This article argues that one of the key forces underpinning Australia’s militarization is an emergent military–industrial–academic complex (MIAC), comprised of increasingly close relationships between universities, defense, and defense industry. The connections between the three have rapidly intensified since 2016 due to changes in defense industry policy, pessimism regarding the strategic environment, the ongoing malaise of the neoliberal university, and the motivations of key individuals. This article demonstrates that each of the three groups is actively seeking closer relationships with the other, driven by a patchwork of competing economic and strategic motivations, and powered by ideals of innovation and the entrepreneurial spirit. Each needs the other—for military advantage, for profits, and for survival. Australia’s emergent but rapidly expanding MIAC raises concerns about the pace, nature, and necessity of Australia’s militarization, the impact on the role of the university in society, and the hollowness of Australian strategic policy. Furthermore, it has substantial implications for strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific, Australia’s alliances, and the Australia-UK-US (AUKUS) partnership.","PeriodicalId":44399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Security Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136078800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Can Insurgents Capture Aid through Credit Claiming? Evidence from Afghanistan 叛乱分子可以通过信用索赔获得援助吗?来自阿富汗的证据

Journal of Global Security Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI: 10.1093/jogss/ogad019

Jori Breslawski

引用次数: 0

Economic Sanctions and the Escalation of Terrorism 经济制裁和恐怖主义升级

Journal of Global Security Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI: 10.1093/jogss/ogad016

Navin A Bapat, Menevis Cilizoglu

引用次数: 0

Public Secrets: The Dynamics of Publicity and Secrecy in Offensive Cyber Operations 公共秘密:攻击性网络行动中公开与保密的动态

Journal of Global Security Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI: 10.1093/jogss/ogad013

Gil Baram

{"title":"Public Secrets: The Dynamics of Publicity and Secrecy in Offensive Cyber Operations","authors":"Gil Baram","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogad013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogad013","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Historically, offensive cyber operations (OCOs) have been considered a practice that states could carry out covertly, away from the public eye, with both perpetrators and defenders having incentives to remain silent. Over the past few years, however, perpetrators and defenders have publicly acknowledged their involvement in OCOs. How common is this strategic choice among states? What are its characteristics? In this research note I show that this is not a binary choice, and that there is variance in the strategies available to either side. I then examine what state behavior patterns can be identified by using compiled data of OCOs between 1996 and 2019. I show that this phenomenon of giving up secrecy is occurring and point out on states’ characteristics and probabilities of choosing each strategy. Initial findings show significant use of public strategies by perpetrators (20 percent) and more so by defenders (50 percent), and that democracies tend toward public credit claiming and attribution, while less democratic countries tend toward public denial. As governments increasingly engage in OCOs, the implications of this research note are of interest to scholars and practitioners alike.","PeriodicalId":44399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Security Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135914891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Out of the Shadows: Ukraine and the Shock of Non-Hybrid War 走出阴影:乌克兰和非混合战争的冲击

IF 1.6

Journal of Global Security Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI: 10.1093/jogss/ogad014

P. Porter

引用次数: 0

Conditional Assistance: Entrapment Concerns and Individual-Level Support for US Alliance Partners 有条件援助:对美国联盟伙伴的陷阱问题和个人层面的支持

Journal of Global Security Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI: 10.1093/jogss/ogad017

Florian Justwan, Jeffrey D Berejikian

{"title":"Conditional Assistance: Entrapment Concerns and Individual-Level Support for US Alliance Partners","authors":"Florian Justwan, Jeffrey D Berejikian","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogad017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogad017","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, we explore how concerns about entrapment influence mass attitudes about armed support for an alliance partner. We focus on two separate dimensions of entrapment: allied crisis instigation and the risk of direct entanglement in a nuclear conflict. Our empirical analysis is based on US experimental survey data, collected in 2021. Our data analysis reveals two main findings. First, people are less likely to endorse military action in support of another country if that state is perceived as the instigator of a given military crisis. However, we find that allied crisis instigation only reduces individual-level support for certain types of military operations (cruise missile and nuclear strikes) but not others. Furthermore, even where significant, the substantive effect of our experimental vignette is fairly limited. This implies that US voters are not particularly sensitive to the potential for offensive entrapment in the US–South Korean alliance. Second, we find that nuclear deterrence threats from international rivals sap public support for military action. However, this is only true (1) for conventional military attacks and (2) if the US President does not provide a substantive justification for military intervention. As soon as leaders offer a detailed rationale for military action, the negative effect of foreign nuclear threats on support for the use of force disappears.","PeriodicalId":44399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Security Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136017337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Governance Interrupted: Rebel Governance and Pro-Government Militias 治理中断:叛军治理和亲政府民兵

IF 1.6

Journal of Global Security Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI: 10.1093/jogss/ogad015

Minnie M. Joo, Santiago Sosa

引用次数: 0

The Impact of COVID-19 on Insurgency and Rebel Governance: Lessons from India's Northeast 2019冠状病毒病对叛乱和叛乱治理的影响:来自印度东北部的经验教训

IF 1.6

Journal of Global Security Studies Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI: 10.1093/jogss/ogad006

E. Newman, J. Saikia, A. Waterman

{"title":"The Impact of COVID-19 on Insurgency and Rebel Governance: Lessons from India's Northeast","authors":"E. Newman, J. Saikia, A. Waterman","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogad006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogad006","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Emerging research has suggested that the COVID-19 pandemic has generally favored rebel organizations—rather than states—in situations of intrastate conflict. This article challenges this perspective by analyzing the pandemic's impact on three dimensions of rebel activity—armed activity, popular support and recruitment, and rebel governance. It does so by using illustrative evidence from long-running insurgencies in Northeast India, characterized by long-term rebel weakness and minimal, if any, territorial control. The article finds that during the early, acute phase of the pandemic in 2020, state-imposed lockdowns, rebels’ own restrictions, and disruptions to supply chains constrained most dimensions of rebel activity. The easing of restrictions in 2021 revealed complex and multidimensional impacts on different armed groups, which often hinged on pre-existing positions such as armed group strength, strategy, relations with the state, and operational circumstances. These experiences of low-level insurgencies lacking territorial control add important qualifiers to the notion that rebels are inherently best placed to capitalize on stochastic shocks such as pandemics. Beyond the case of Northeast India, these findings make a number of contributions to the analysis of counterinsurgency and rebel governance.","PeriodicalId":44399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Security Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87991728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Dealing with Divergence: Intra-party Dynamics and Spoiler Management in Civil Wars 处理分歧:内战中的党内动态和破坏者管理

IF 1.6

Journal of Global Security Studies Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI: 10.1093/jogss/ogad003

Desirée Nilsson, M. S. Kovacs

{"title":"Dealing with Divergence: Intra-party Dynamics and Spoiler Management in Civil Wars","authors":"Desirée Nilsson, M. S. Kovacs","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogad003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogad003","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Civil war peace processes are frequently accompanied by spoiler behavior relating to intra-party divergence, such as leadership struggles or breakaway groups, which risk undermining the implementation of a peace accord. However, previous literature has not sufficiently explored how third-party actors can address spoiler behavior linked to such intra-party aspects. This study addresses this gap by providing an empirical analysis of a few illustrative cases of spoiler behavior by armed actors in two peace processes in West Africa—Sierra Leone after the 1999 Lomé peace accords and Liberia after the 2003 Accra peace agreement. We find that in contexts where there is a vertical divergence between the leader and the rest of the group, divisive strategies—aimed to divide and rule or marginalize—are effective. In contrast, in situations of horizontal divergence between different factions that are more equal in power, integrative strategies—aimed at unifying the ranks or reconciling a divided leadership—are more appropriate. This study enhances our understanding of how third-party strategies can be devised to manage intra-party divisions that otherwise may threaten a transition from war to peace.","PeriodicalId":44399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Security Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74490195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Shaming and Treaty Ratification 羞辱和条约批准

IF 1.6

Journal of Global Security Studies Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI: 10.1093/jogss/ogad007

Ryan M. Welch

引用次数: 0