THEOLOGY TODAY最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Empowerment as Critical Religious Pedagogy 赋权作为关键的宗教教育学
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
THEOLOGY TODAY Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1177/00405736231172692
Michael Domsgen
{"title":"Empowerment as Critical Religious Pedagogy","authors":"Michael Domsgen","doi":"10.1177/00405736231172692","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736231172692","url":null,"abstract":"The article makes a proposal for the reorientation of religious education in an empowerment perspective. The discourses in which important perspectives are opened under this term can be found in community psychology, social work theory, disability education, and critical pedagogy. The author briefly introduces them and then asks what potential they hold for the theory and practice of religious education. In this way, a stimulating space of discourse opens up to rewrite religious education in the horizon of empowerment.","PeriodicalId":43855,"journal":{"name":"THEOLOGY TODAY","volume":"80 1","pages":"183 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44839207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Theological Study of Julian of Norwich’s Hopeful Words “All Shall Be Well” 诺维奇的朱利安“一切都会好起来”的神学研究
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
THEOLOGY TODAY Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1177/00405736231172680
Jong-hoi Kim
{"title":"A Theological Study of Julian of Norwich’s Hopeful Words “All Shall Be Well”","authors":"Jong-hoi Kim","doi":"10.1177/00405736231172680","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736231172680","url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the perspective in Julian Norwich's words, “All Shall Be Well” through the lens of the Korean Presbyterian Church, specifically its focus on sin and repentance as a practical interest. Examining the concept of sin that is emphasized in practice, I compare John Calvin’s theology of sin with Julian’s to reconsider a comprehensive understanding of sin for helping Korean Christians on their spiritual journey.","PeriodicalId":43855,"journal":{"name":"THEOLOGY TODAY","volume":"80 1","pages":"222 - 232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42805408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
America's Christian Nationalism, Theological Anomalies, and Constructive Responses 美国基督教民族主义、神学反常与建设性回应
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
THEOLOGY TODAY Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1177/00405736231172681
William R. Myers
{"title":"America's Christian Nationalism, Theological Anomalies, and Constructive Responses","authors":"William R. Myers","doi":"10.1177/00405736231172681","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736231172681","url":null,"abstract":"From both the political right and left, the Charlottesville March re-awakened American interest in theocracy. American Christians became interested in something called Christian Nationalism. America's theocratic ideas had surfaced during American colonialism and later as the Protestant church operationalized a theocratic formational process called Christian nurture. That theological idea became an unhelpful, theocratic, theological anomaly. In similar fashion, the evangelical movement's support of an autocratic, presidential candidate had its roots within another unhelpful, theocratic theological construction. While unpacking such theocratic anomalies, the originalist legal theory of The Supreme Court is compared with Christian theological originalism. Constructive responses to the mainline church and the evangelical movement's theocratic anomalies are offered by theologians Dorothee Soelle and Jürgen Moltmann.","PeriodicalId":43855,"journal":{"name":"THEOLOGY TODAY","volume":"80 1","pages":"131 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46949119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
To See Responsibility from Below: Bonhoeffer, Niebuhr, and Racism 从下面看责任:邦霍费尔、尼布尔和种族主义
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
THEOLOGY TODAY Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1177/00405736231172699
Kristopher Norris
{"title":"To See Responsibility from Below: Bonhoeffer, Niebuhr, and Racism","authors":"Kristopher Norris","doi":"10.1177/00405736231172699","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736231172699","url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes and compares the theologies of Bonhoeffer and Reinhold Niebuhr regarding race and racial injustice. It examines the ways both theologians responded to the racial crisis in America, and Bonhoeffer in Nazi Germany, in patterns consistent with their own divergent accounts of moral responsibility. The article argues that Bonhoeffer's theology of the responsible life offers deeper ethical resources than Niebuhr's for responding to the contemporary realities of White supremacy. Yet, while celebrating Bonhoeffer's contributions, it concludes by drawing on criticisms of Bonhoeffer from feminist and womanist thinkers to press this notion of acting responsibly in light of white supremacy beyond Bonhoeffer and offering one concrete example of an institution attempting to do that work.","PeriodicalId":43855,"journal":{"name":"THEOLOGY TODAY","volume":"80 1","pages":"144 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49525705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Book Review: Historical Foundations of Worship: Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant Perspectives by Melanie C. Ross and Mark A. Lamport eds. Melanie C.Ross和Mark A.Lamport编辑的书评:《崇拜的历史基础:天主教、东正教和新教视角》。
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
THEOLOGY TODAY Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1177/00405736231164955
James W. Farwell
{"title":"Book Review: Historical Foundations of Worship: Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant Perspectives by Melanie C. Ross and Mark A. Lamport eds.","authors":"James W. Farwell","doi":"10.1177/00405736231164955","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736231164955","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43855,"journal":{"name":"THEOLOGY TODAY","volume":"80 1","pages":"233 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45648571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Book Review: Unspeakable Cults: An Essay in Christology by Paul J. DeHart 书评:保罗·J·德哈特的《无法言说的邪教:基督论随笔》
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
THEOLOGY TODAY Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI: 10.1177/00405736221145258
Jay Martin
{"title":"Book Review: Unspeakable Cults: An Essay in Christology by Paul J. DeHart","authors":"Jay Martin","doi":"10.1177/00405736221145258","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736221145258","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43855,"journal":{"name":"THEOLOGY TODAY","volume":"80 1","pages":"104 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45150186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Book Review: Sustaining Hope: Friendships and Intellectual Impairments by David B. McEwan and Jim Good 书评:大卫·b·麦克尤恩和吉姆·古德著的《维持希望:友谊与智力缺陷》
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
THEOLOGY TODAY Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI: 10.1177/00405736221145258c
Erin Raffety
{"title":"Book Review: Sustaining Hope: Friendships and Intellectual Impairments by David B. McEwan and Jim Good","authors":"Erin Raffety","doi":"10.1177/00405736221145258c","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736221145258c","url":null,"abstract":"ary practices are carried forward in the Pastoral Epistles, which seek to re-establish Pauline teaching and authority in the midst of ongoing threats to communal identity. The conclusion effectively summarizes the argument and suggests in the last two sentences that more work in this vein remains to be done on other NT communities. The argument of this book, in the perception of this reviewer, is clearly organized, amply researched, elegantly written, and in the end persuasive in its central claims. My one minor critique is that White might be more explicit about the ways in which his study builds upon, extends, or departs from the previous studies mentioned in the introduction by Forkman (1972) and Hein (1973).","PeriodicalId":43855,"journal":{"name":"THEOLOGY TODAY","volume":"80 1","pages":"109 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45848078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Misreading C. S. Lewis on Friendship: The Charges of Sexism, Secrecy, and Snobbery 误读c.s.刘易斯的友谊:对性别歧视、保密和势利的指控
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
THEOLOGY TODAY Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI: 10.1177/00405736231151648
Jason Lepojärvi
{"title":"Misreading C. S. Lewis on Friendship: The Charges of Sexism, Secrecy, and Snobbery","authors":"Jason Lepojärvi","doi":"10.1177/00405736231151648","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736231151648","url":null,"abstract":"C. S. Lewis's published writings comprise some forty-odd books in multiple genres, hundreds of essays, and thousands of letters. The theme that arguably rises above other themes is love, and within the family of different kinds of love, the love of friendship holds prominence. Although Lewis is often credited for accessible writing, there exists a number of popular misunderstandings about his ideas of friendship in particular. Several writers—theologians, philosophers, and literary scholars—have leveled serious charges against Lewis's understanding of friendship. This article will evaluate three of these charges in more detail, those of sexism, secrecy, and snobbery. The article shows that these are based on incomplete readings or complete misreadings of Lewis's life and writings. This is not to say that Lewis had no blind spots (he certainly did), but that they are not always where his critics see them.","PeriodicalId":43855,"journal":{"name":"THEOLOGY TODAY","volume":"80 1","pages":"88 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46683835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evangelical or Mainline? Doctrinal Similarity and Difference in Asian American Christianity: Sketching a Social-Practical Theory of Christian Doctrine 福音派还是主线?亚裔基督教的教义异同——基督教教义的社会实践理论
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
THEOLOGY TODAY Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI: 10.1177/00405736221150397
David C. Chao
{"title":"Evangelical or Mainline? Doctrinal Similarity and Difference in Asian American Christianity: Sketching a Social-Practical Theory of Christian Doctrine","authors":"David C. Chao","doi":"10.1177/00405736221150397","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736221150397","url":null,"abstract":"This article takes Asian American Christianity to be an analytically productive religion for advancing a theory of Christian doctrine. This is in large part due to the trans-Pacific character of Asian Americans Christians who, by virtue of their racialization, make explicit the different social circumstances—from Anglo-European Christians—as well as shared ends in which Christian doctrinal commitments operate. Asian American Christians problematize the conventional wisdom assumed in the academic and public discourses concerning Christianity in the US. One of the primary set of categories in the discourses about Christianity in the US is the theological difference between evangelical and mainline Protestants. Moreover, these theological and doctrinal categories are taken to describe and define these two social groups of Christians. By centering empirical studies of Asian American Christian faith and practice, this article claims that doctrinal similarity and doctrinal difference, such as that between evangelical and mainline Protestants, do not simply explain social group similarity or difference as assumed by conventional wisdom. Instead, these Asian American case studies point to the need for a new theory of Christian doctrine that can explain the normative significance of doctrinal similarity and difference in terms of the uses of doctrine.","PeriodicalId":43855,"journal":{"name":"THEOLOGY TODAY","volume":"80 1","pages":"54 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44486432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Book Review: Invisible: Theology and the Experience of Asian American Women by Grace Ji-Sun Kim 书评:《看不见的:神学与亚裔美国女性的经历》,作者:金志善
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
THEOLOGY TODAY Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI: 10.1177/00405736221145258a
Rebecca Jeong
{"title":"Book Review: Invisible: Theology and the Experience of Asian American Women by Grace Ji-Sun Kim","authors":"Rebecca Jeong","doi":"10.1177/00405736221145258a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736221145258a","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43855,"journal":{"name":"THEOLOGY TODAY","volume":"80 1","pages":"106 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44490753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信