从下面看责任:邦霍费尔、尼布尔和种族主义

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Kristopher Norris
{"title":"从下面看责任:邦霍费尔、尼布尔和种族主义","authors":"Kristopher Norris","doi":"10.1177/00405736231172699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes and compares the theologies of Bonhoeffer and Reinhold Niebuhr regarding race and racial injustice. It examines the ways both theologians responded to the racial crisis in America, and Bonhoeffer in Nazi Germany, in patterns consistent with their own divergent accounts of moral responsibility. The article argues that Bonhoeffer's theology of the responsible life offers deeper ethical resources than Niebuhr's for responding to the contemporary realities of White supremacy. Yet, while celebrating Bonhoeffer's contributions, it concludes by drawing on criticisms of Bonhoeffer from feminist and womanist thinkers to press this notion of acting responsibly in light of white supremacy beyond Bonhoeffer and offering one concrete example of an institution attempting to do that work.","PeriodicalId":43855,"journal":{"name":"THEOLOGY TODAY","volume":"80 1","pages":"144 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To See Responsibility from Below: Bonhoeffer, Niebuhr, and Racism\",\"authors\":\"Kristopher Norris\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00405736231172699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes and compares the theologies of Bonhoeffer and Reinhold Niebuhr regarding race and racial injustice. It examines the ways both theologians responded to the racial crisis in America, and Bonhoeffer in Nazi Germany, in patterns consistent with their own divergent accounts of moral responsibility. The article argues that Bonhoeffer's theology of the responsible life offers deeper ethical resources than Niebuhr's for responding to the contemporary realities of White supremacy. Yet, while celebrating Bonhoeffer's contributions, it concludes by drawing on criticisms of Bonhoeffer from feminist and womanist thinkers to press this notion of acting responsibly in light of white supremacy beyond Bonhoeffer and offering one concrete example of an institution attempting to do that work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THEOLOGY TODAY\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"144 - 161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THEOLOGY TODAY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736231172699\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEOLOGY TODAY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736231172699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对邦霍费尔和尼布尔关于种族和种族不公正的神学思想进行了分析和比较。它考察了神学家和纳粹德国的邦霍费尔对美国种族危机的反应方式,其模式与他们自己对道德责任的不同描述一致。这篇文章认为,邦霍费尔关于负责任生活的神学为回应白人至上主义的当代现实提供了比尼布更深层的伦理资源。然而,在庆祝邦霍费尔的贡献的同时,它总结了女权主义和女权主义思想家对邦霍费尔提出的批评,将这种在白人至上主义的背景下负责任地行事的概念推广到邦霍费尔之外,并提供了一个机构试图做这项工作的具体例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To See Responsibility from Below: Bonhoeffer, Niebuhr, and Racism
This article analyzes and compares the theologies of Bonhoeffer and Reinhold Niebuhr regarding race and racial injustice. It examines the ways both theologians responded to the racial crisis in America, and Bonhoeffer in Nazi Germany, in patterns consistent with their own divergent accounts of moral responsibility. The article argues that Bonhoeffer's theology of the responsible life offers deeper ethical resources than Niebuhr's for responding to the contemporary realities of White supremacy. Yet, while celebrating Bonhoeffer's contributions, it concludes by drawing on criticisms of Bonhoeffer from feminist and womanist thinkers to press this notion of acting responsibly in light of white supremacy beyond Bonhoeffer and offering one concrete example of an institution attempting to do that work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
THEOLOGY TODAY
THEOLOGY TODAY RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信