EC Tax Review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Article: Statistical Picture of the European Court of Human Rights’ Tax-Related Cases Containing Separate Opinions 文章:欧洲人权法院涉税案件的统计图,包含单独的意见
IF 0.6
EC Tax Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.54648/ecta2023004
Patryk Kowalski
{"title":"Article: Statistical Picture of the European Court of Human Rights’ Tax-Related Cases Containing Separate Opinions","authors":"Patryk Kowalski","doi":"10.54648/ecta2023004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2023004","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to select tax-related cases from the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law in the years 1959 – 2020 and analyse all such cases using empirical legal studies method, focusing mostly on separate opinions. This analysis led to the selection of research material covering 176 tax-related cases (179 judgments, sixty-nine separate opinions). The most important research findings include, e.g., small number of ECtHR judgments in tax matters, low frequency at which they are issued, the fact that judges submit separate opinion more frequently in a situation when a judgment finding no violation is delivered rather than when a judgment finding violation is delivered. Moreover, the article contains an extensive review of the literature with regard to the undertaken subject.\u0000separate opinion, dissenting opinion, concurring opinion, tax-related cases, empirical legal studies","PeriodicalId":43686,"journal":{"name":"EC Tax Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45209289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Article: New Tendencies Regarding the Relevance of Formal Requirements in VAT Law 文章:关于增值税法形式要求相关性的新趋势
IF 0.6
EC Tax Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.54648/ecta2023002
David Hummel
{"title":"Article: New Tendencies Regarding the Relevance of Formal Requirements in VAT Law","authors":"David Hummel","doi":"10.54648/ecta2023002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2023002","url":null,"abstract":"Back in 1858, Rudolf von Jhering, a well-known German legal scholar, said: ‘Form is the sworn enemy of arbitrariness, the twin sister of freedom’. Perhaps this is why Value Added Tax (VAT) law includes many formal requirements before the taxpayer can exercise his right of deduction or can opt for taxation, for example. Concerning these formal requirements, it is not disputed that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU or Court of Justice) has put a stop to excessive formalism in VAT law. However, there are some interesting recent decisions of the Court of Justice, which were dealing with the question as to whether the lack of formal requirements allows the financial administration to deny the right of deduction or the right to opt for taxation, even if the material conditions are fulfilled. This article shows that there is a recent tendency in the jurisprudence of the CJEU to take more into account the function of formal conditions in the field of VAT law. It seems that the Court has found now a better balance between the rights of the taxable person and the principle of proportionality, on the one hand, and the principle of neutrality and the uniform and simple application of VAT law, on the other.\u0000VAT law, formal requirements, VAT identification number, Invoice, Registration as taxable person, formal and material conditions, sens of form, no right to deduction without an invoice, necessary content of an invoice","PeriodicalId":43686,"journal":{"name":"EC Tax Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41420674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: Pillar 2, Fiat, and the EU Unanimity Rule on Tax Matters 社论:第二支柱,菲亚特和欧盟税务问题一致同意规则
IF 0.6
EC Tax Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.54648/ecta2023001
R. de la Feria
{"title":"Editorial: Pillar 2, Fiat, and the EU Unanimity Rule on Tax Matters","authors":"R. de la Feria","doi":"10.54648/ecta2023001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2023001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43686,"journal":{"name":"EC Tax Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48075163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Article: The EU VAT Rate Reform 2022 from an Environmental Policy Perspective 文章:从环境政策角度看2022年欧盟增值税税率改革
EC Tax Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.54648/ecta2023003
Stefanie Geringer
{"title":"Article: The EU VAT Rate Reform 2022 from an Environmental Policy Perspective","authors":"Stefanie Geringer","doi":"10.54648/ecta2023003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2023003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43686,"journal":{"name":"EC Tax Review","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135470661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Article: Analysis of the (In)compatibility of Digital Services Taxes With State Aid Rules 文章:数字服务税与国家援助规则的兼容性分析
IF 0.6
EC Tax Review Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.54648/ecta2022031
María Carro Pitarch
{"title":"Article: Analysis of the (In)compatibility of Digital Services Taxes With State Aid Rules","authors":"María Carro Pitarch","doi":"10.54648/ecta2022031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2022031","url":null,"abstract":"After the recent agreements at a global level, some Member States of the European Union have paused their plans for Digital Services Taxes. However, others have decided to move forward with them as the global political agreement reached, while encouraging, has not been implemented yet. Therefore, it is still relevant to understand the nature of such taxes and, more importantly in the context of the EU, their possible (in)compatibility with state aid rules.\u0000The purpose of this article is to shed light into these measures in a manner that encompasses all possible taxes. To establish the possible incompatibility of the taxes, an analysis is made passing through all the conditions for a measure to be considered as state aid and giving particular importance to the notion of selective advantage, which will be the determining factor if the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ever must pronounce itself on this matter.\u0000Digital Services Taxes, State aid, Fiscal State aid, Selective Advantage, European Union, European Commission, Court of Justice of the European Union, Unilateral measures, OECD","PeriodicalId":43686,"journal":{"name":"EC Tax Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46473381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Article: Reaching Cross-Border Tax Certainty With Joint Audits 文章:通过联合审计实现跨境税收确定性
IF 0.6
EC Tax Review Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.54648/ecta2022029
Isabella Zimmerl
{"title":"Article: Reaching Cross-Border Tax Certainty With Joint Audits","authors":"Isabella Zimmerl","doi":"10.54648/ecta2022029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2022029","url":null,"abstract":"The last few years have seen an increasing cooperation between tax authorities of Member States of the European Union by way of joint audits. This article shows how joint audits can provide an efficient solution to double taxation issues faced by internationally active companies. It centres on ways to amend and effectuate existing procedures of international tax law in light of experiences made with joint audits, focusing in particular on potential ways for more cross-border tax certainty. Furthermore, the article illustrates that an effective und legally certain reduction of international double taxation can best be reached by a stronger cooperation of tax authorities and the taxpayer/s. Finally, the author takes a look at recent developments in the field as well as the potential future of joint audits, emphasizing the need for more legally binding solutions.\u0000joint audit; joint tax audit; mutual agreement procedure; advance pricing agreement; tax certainty; cross-border tax certainty; dispute prevention; double taxation; transfer pricing; administrative cooperation","PeriodicalId":43686,"journal":{"name":"EC Tax Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48514002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: Fiscal Federalism in the EU. A Dynamic Process With Multiple Dimensions 社论:欧盟的财政联邦制。多维动态过程
IF 0.6
EC Tax Review Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.54648/ecta2022028
Bruno Peeters
{"title":"Editorial: Fiscal Federalism in the EU. A Dynamic Process With Multiple Dimensions","authors":"Bruno Peeters","doi":"10.54648/ecta2022028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2022028","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43686,"journal":{"name":"EC Tax Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44381345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Forum: Repayment of Capital: A Real Evergreen Under German and EU Tax Law 论坛:偿还资本:德国和欧盟税法下真正的常青树
IF 0.6
EC Tax Review Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.54648/ecta2022032
Florian Haase
{"title":"Forum: Repayment of Capital: A Real Evergreen Under German and EU Tax Law","authors":"Florian Haase","doi":"10.54648/ecta2022032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2022032","url":null,"abstract":"The discussion about the tax consequences of a repayment of capital contributions made by corporations has been going on for years in Germany. Today, the issue has been defused, but uncertainties remain for non-EU corporations that make payments to their German shareholders.","PeriodicalId":43686,"journal":{"name":"EC Tax Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47908177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Forum Contributions: CJEU Case Law on Exercising Rights Under EU VAT: Is There a Golden Thread in the Distinction Between Substantive and Formal Conditions? 论坛贡献:欧盟法院关于欧盟增值税下行使权利的判例法:实体条件和形式条件的区别是否存在一条金线?
IF 0.6
EC Tax Review Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.54648/ecta2022033
Fabian Barth
{"title":"Forum Contributions: CJEU Case Law on Exercising Rights Under EU VAT: Is There a Golden Thread in the Distinction Between Substantive and Formal Conditions?","authors":"Fabian Barth","doi":"10.54648/ecta2022033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2022033","url":null,"abstract":"Exercising rights under EU Value Added Tax (‘VAT’) law (for example recovering input tax) is often subject to certain conditions. A distinction however exists between substantive and formal requirements: Non-fulfilment of the latter does not need to be fatal for a taxpayer’s claim. That being the case, the question arises how a condition can be classified as either ‘substantive’ or ‘formal’. The author summarizes the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) in the area and notes that the Court has so far refrained from providing an all-encompassing test. The article therefore explores whether a golden thread can be identified and analyses if the Court may have had a general principle in mind when labelling conditions as ‘formal’ in judicial precedent.\u0000VAT, CJEU, substantive, formal, invoice, intra-Community supply","PeriodicalId":43686,"journal":{"name":"EC Tax Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47471989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Article: Is the Symmetrical Classification Method EU Proof? 文章:对称分类法是欧盟的证明吗?
IF 0.6
EC Tax Review Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.54648/ecta2022030
T. Stevens, Mart van Hulten
{"title":"Article: Is the Symmetrical Classification Method EU Proof?","authors":"T. Stevens, Mart van Hulten","doi":"10.54648/ecta2022030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2022030","url":null,"abstract":"One way to solve classification conflicts involving hybrid entities is for states to apply a so-called symmetrical classification method, whereby a state adopts for its domestic tax purposes the tax classification applied to an entity by another state. The outcome of applying such a method can be that a state classifies foreign entities differently from domestic entities, raising potential issues from an EU law perspective when EU Member States are involved. For instance, in case a cross-border situation leads to more burdensome taxation compared to the domestic situation, a violation of the EU fundamental freedoms can be present, whereas if the classification leads to a lower tax burden for certain enterprises, a violation of EU State aid rules can be the result.\u0000In this article, we assess the conformity with primary EU law of tax classification methods, and especially of the symmetrical classification method. It is concluded that the risk of incompatibility with the EU fundamental freedoms and EU State aid rules should typically be limited when EU Member States align their tax classification rules with those of other states to alleviate risks of double (non-)taxation. Risks can increase, however, for instance if nationality is used as a distinguishing criterion, or where under- or overkill occurs.\u0000Taxation, Hybrid Entities, Mismatches, Classification, Symmetrical Method, EU Law, Fundamental Freedoms, State Aid","PeriodicalId":43686,"journal":{"name":"EC Tax Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46912123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信