文章:数字服务税与国家援助规则的兼容性分析

Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.54648/ecta2022031
María Carro Pitarch
{"title":"文章:数字服务税与国家援助规则的兼容性分析","authors":"María Carro Pitarch","doi":"10.54648/ecta2022031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the recent agreements at a global level, some Member States of the European Union have paused their plans for Digital Services Taxes. However, others have decided to move forward with them as the global political agreement reached, while encouraging, has not been implemented yet. Therefore, it is still relevant to understand the nature of such taxes and, more importantly in the context of the EU, their possible (in)compatibility with state aid rules.\nThe purpose of this article is to shed light into these measures in a manner that encompasses all possible taxes. To establish the possible incompatibility of the taxes, an analysis is made passing through all the conditions for a measure to be considered as state aid and giving particular importance to the notion of selective advantage, which will be the determining factor if the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ever must pronounce itself on this matter.\nDigital Services Taxes, State aid, Fiscal State aid, Selective Advantage, European Union, European Commission, Court of Justice of the European Union, Unilateral measures, OECD","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Article: Analysis of the (In)compatibility of Digital Services Taxes With State Aid Rules\",\"authors\":\"María Carro Pitarch\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/ecta2022031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After the recent agreements at a global level, some Member States of the European Union have paused their plans for Digital Services Taxes. However, others have decided to move forward with them as the global political agreement reached, while encouraging, has not been implemented yet. Therefore, it is still relevant to understand the nature of such taxes and, more importantly in the context of the EU, their possible (in)compatibility with state aid rules.\\nThe purpose of this article is to shed light into these measures in a manner that encompasses all possible taxes. To establish the possible incompatibility of the taxes, an analysis is made passing through all the conditions for a measure to be considered as state aid and giving particular importance to the notion of selective advantage, which will be the determining factor if the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ever must pronounce itself on this matter.\\nDigital Services Taxes, State aid, Fiscal State aid, Selective Advantage, European Union, European Commission, Court of Justice of the European Union, Unilateral measures, OECD\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2022031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2022031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近在全球层面达成协议后,一些欧盟成员国暂停了数字服务税计划。然而,其他人决定与他们一起前进,因为达成的全球政治协议虽然令人鼓舞,但尚未得到执行。因此,了解此类税收的性质,更重要的是,在欧盟的背景下,了解其可能与国家援助规则的兼容性,仍然是相关的。这篇文章的目的是以一种包括所有可能的税收的方式来阐明这些措施。为了确定税收的可能不相容性,分析了一项措施被视为国家援助的所有条件,并特别重视选择性优势的概念,如果欧盟法院必须就此事发表意见,这将是决定因素。数字服务税、国家援助、财政国家援助、选择性优势、欧盟、欧盟委员会、欧盟法院、单方面措施、经合组织
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Article: Analysis of the (In)compatibility of Digital Services Taxes With State Aid Rules
After the recent agreements at a global level, some Member States of the European Union have paused their plans for Digital Services Taxes. However, others have decided to move forward with them as the global political agreement reached, while encouraging, has not been implemented yet. Therefore, it is still relevant to understand the nature of such taxes and, more importantly in the context of the EU, their possible (in)compatibility with state aid rules. The purpose of this article is to shed light into these measures in a manner that encompasses all possible taxes. To establish the possible incompatibility of the taxes, an analysis is made passing through all the conditions for a measure to be considered as state aid and giving particular importance to the notion of selective advantage, which will be the determining factor if the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ever must pronounce itself on this matter. Digital Services Taxes, State aid, Fiscal State aid, Selective Advantage, European Union, European Commission, Court of Justice of the European Union, Unilateral measures, OECD
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信