Article: New Tendencies Regarding the Relevance of Formal Requirements in VAT Law

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.54648/ecta2023002
David Hummel
{"title":"Article: New Tendencies Regarding the Relevance of Formal Requirements in VAT Law","authors":"David Hummel","doi":"10.54648/ecta2023002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Back in 1858, Rudolf von Jhering, a well-known German legal scholar, said: ‘Form is the sworn enemy of arbitrariness, the twin sister of freedom’. Perhaps this is why Value Added Tax (VAT) law includes many formal requirements before the taxpayer can exercise his right of deduction or can opt for taxation, for example. Concerning these formal requirements, it is not disputed that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU or Court of Justice) has put a stop to excessive formalism in VAT law. However, there are some interesting recent decisions of the Court of Justice, which were dealing with the question as to whether the lack of formal requirements allows the financial administration to deny the right of deduction or the right to opt for taxation, even if the material conditions are fulfilled. This article shows that there is a recent tendency in the jurisprudence of the CJEU to take more into account the function of formal conditions in the field of VAT law. It seems that the Court has found now a better balance between the rights of the taxable person and the principle of proportionality, on the one hand, and the principle of neutrality and the uniform and simple application of VAT law, on the other.\nVAT law, formal requirements, VAT identification number, Invoice, Registration as taxable person, formal and material conditions, sens of form, no right to deduction without an invoice, necessary content of an invoice","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2023002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Back in 1858, Rudolf von Jhering, a well-known German legal scholar, said: ‘Form is the sworn enemy of arbitrariness, the twin sister of freedom’. Perhaps this is why Value Added Tax (VAT) law includes many formal requirements before the taxpayer can exercise his right of deduction or can opt for taxation, for example. Concerning these formal requirements, it is not disputed that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU or Court of Justice) has put a stop to excessive formalism in VAT law. However, there are some interesting recent decisions of the Court of Justice, which were dealing with the question as to whether the lack of formal requirements allows the financial administration to deny the right of deduction or the right to opt for taxation, even if the material conditions are fulfilled. This article shows that there is a recent tendency in the jurisprudence of the CJEU to take more into account the function of formal conditions in the field of VAT law. It seems that the Court has found now a better balance between the rights of the taxable person and the principle of proportionality, on the one hand, and the principle of neutrality and the uniform and simple application of VAT law, on the other. VAT law, formal requirements, VAT identification number, Invoice, Registration as taxable person, formal and material conditions, sens of form, no right to deduction without an invoice, necessary content of an invoice
分享
查看原文
文章:关于增值税法形式要求相关性的新趋势
早在1858年,德国著名法律学者鲁道夫·冯·杰林就说过:“形式是任意性的死对头,是自由的孪生姐妹”。也许这就是为什么增值税(VAT)法在纳税人行使扣除权或选择征税之前包括许多正式要求的原因。关于这些正式要求,毫无疑问,欧盟法院(CJEU或法院)已经制止了增值税法律中的过度形式主义。然而,法院最近作出了一些令人感兴趣的裁决,这些裁决涉及这样一个问题,即缺乏正式要求是否允许财政管理部门拒绝扣除的权利或选择征税的权利,即使物质条件得到满足。本文表明,欧盟法院最近的判例倾向于在增值税法领域更多地考虑形式条件的作用。法院现在似乎在应税人员的权利和比例原则与中立原则以及统一和简单适用增值税法之间找到了更好的平衡。增值税法律、形式要求、增值税识别号、发票、应纳税人登记、形式和物质条件、形式感、无发票无权扣除、发票的必要内容
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信