发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Monash Bioethics Review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The cost-benefit and ethics of Covid-19 vaccine mandates in New Zealand. 新西兰Covid-19疫苗授权的成本效益和伦理
IF 1.6
Monash Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2026-04-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-026-00284-3
Martin Lally
{"title":"The cost-benefit and ethics of Covid-19 vaccine mandates in New Zealand.","authors":"Martin Lally","doi":"10.1007/s40592-026-00284-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-026-00284-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147594932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Modus tollens and the epistemic limits of moral intuition in bioethical reasoning: a response to Gabriel Andrade. 生命伦理推理中道德直觉的认知限制：对加布里埃尔·安德拉德的回应。
IF 1.6
Monash Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2026-03-26 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-026-00286-1
Johnny Sakr
{"title":"Modus tollens and the epistemic limits of moral intuition in bioethical reasoning: a response to Gabriel Andrade.","authors":"Johnny Sakr","doi":"10.1007/s40592-026-00286-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-026-00286-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gabriel Andrade's recent article, published in Monash Bioethics Review, employs a modus tollens argument to claim that abortion cannot be murder by contending that, if it were, violent resistance (e.g. bombing abortion clinics) would be justified under Just War theory. Because such violence is widely condemned, he concludes that abortion is not murder. This paper critically examines the underlying ethical and legal assumptions of that argument. By interrogating the premises related to Just War theory, and supplementing the critique with counter-modus tollens arguments derived from contemporary foetal homicide statutes and the concept of conditional moral status, this paper demonstrates that reducing the moral status of abortion to the permissibility or impermissibility of violence is both conceptually and practically flawed. This paper calls for an ethical framework that respects legal consistency, competing rights claims, and the importance of procedural restraint in resolving bioethical challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147521878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Attending to the micro in resource prioritisation: ethical challenges for staff working with long waiting lists for elective surgery. 关注微观的资源优先排序：等待长时间手术的员工面临的道德挑战。
IF 1.6
Monash Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2026-03-25 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-026-00285-2
Rosalind McDougall, Sharon Feldman, Katheryn Hall, Danielle Ko
{"title":"Attending to the micro in resource prioritisation: ethical challenges for staff working with long waiting lists for elective surgery.","authors":"Rosalind McDougall, Sharon Feldman, Katheryn Hall, Danielle Ko","doi":"10.1007/s40592-026-00285-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-026-00285-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147515569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How can we foster solidarity in a culturally diverse society? Taking dementia prevention through technology as an example. 我们如何在一个多元文化的社会中促进团结？以科技预防痴呆症为例。
IF 1.6
Monash Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2026-02-10 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-026-00283-4
Shingo Segawa, Zümrüt Alpinar-Segawa
{"title":"How can we foster solidarity in a culturally diverse society? Taking dementia prevention through technology as an example.","authors":"Shingo Segawa, Zümrüt Alpinar-Segawa","doi":"10.1007/s40592-026-00283-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-026-00283-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146150970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trust-based beneficence and relational autonomy in neonatal ethics. 新生儿伦理中基于信任的慈善与关系自治。
IF 1.6
Monash Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2026-02-06 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-026-00282-5
Emrah Can, Yakup Karakurt, Çağrı Cumhur Gök
{"title":"Trust-based beneficence and relational autonomy in neonatal ethics.","authors":"Emrah Can, Yakup Karakurt, Çağrı Cumhur Gök","doi":"10.1007/s40592-026-00282-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-026-00282-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146132883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factitious disorder and liability. 人为障碍和责任。
IF 1.6
Monash Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-026-00281-6
T M Wilkinson
{"title":"Factitious disorder and liability.","authors":"T M Wilkinson","doi":"10.1007/s40592-026-00281-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-026-00281-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146126937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The ethics of wegovy for children: the argument from too many unknowns. 养育孩子的伦理：来自太多未知的争论。
IF 1.6
Monash Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2026-01-17 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-025-00280-z
Nanette Ryan, Julian Savulescu
{"title":"The ethics of wegovy for children: the argument from too many unknowns.","authors":"Nanette Ryan, Julian Savulescu","doi":"10.1007/s40592-025-00280-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-025-00280-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145991246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stephen Scher and Kasia Kozlowska: Revitalizing health care ethics: the clinician's voice : Palgrave Macmillan, 2025. Open access. Stephen Scher和Kasia Kozlowska：重振卫生保健伦理：临床医生的声音：Palgrave Macmillan， 2025。开放获取。
IF 1.6
Monash Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-025-00278-7
Berge Solberg
{"title":"Stephen Scher and Kasia Kozlowska: Revitalizing health care ethics: the clinician's voice : Palgrave Macmillan, 2025. Open access.","authors":"Berge Solberg","doi":"10.1007/s40592-025-00278-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-025-00278-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Against the right to mutilation: an analogy ad absurdum. 反对残害的权利：类比与谬论。
IF 1.6
Monash Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-025-00279-6
Morten Dige
{"title":"Against the right to mutilation: an analogy ad absurdum.","authors":"Morten Dige","doi":"10.1007/s40592-025-00279-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-025-00279-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The persistence of "Caucasian" as a descriptor in research and clinical practice in australia: a commentary with focus on mental health. 在澳大利亚的研究和临床实践中，“高加索人”作为一种描述符的持久性：一种以心理健康为重点的评论。
IF 1.6
Monash Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2025-12-03 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-025-00270-1
Matheus Machado Rech, Lucas Henrique Viscardi, Carlos Zubaran
{"title":"The persistence of \"Caucasian\" as a descriptor in research and clinical practice in australia: a commentary with focus on mental health.","authors":"Matheus Machado Rech, Lucas Henrique Viscardi, Carlos Zubaran","doi":"10.1007/s40592-025-00270-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-025-00270-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In research and clinical practice, the words chosen to describe others matter, particularly regarding race and ethnicity. Some terminologies are particularly problematic and should be avoided, given their tendency to distort cohorts of individuals based on presupposed common attributes and demographic characteristics. Racial taxonomy may unintentionally give rise to pejorative and potentially unsettling connotations. Hence, outdated racialised designations should be superseded by ethically and scientifically meaningful alternatives. The term Caucasian, as demonstrated in this manuscript, has persisted as a frequent terminology in Western biomedical parlance when referring to white individuals. The use of the term Caucasian represents a relic of an outdated and prejudiced racial classification system. In particular, the persistence of this terminology in the Australian healthcare setting is in disagreement with contemporary scientific and worldview values. Although the use of Caucasian as a descriptor has been challenged, given its inherent taxonomic and methodological flaws, several professional associations continue to include Caucasian as an acceptable category in racial classification systems, which suggests this time-worn term remains in wide use. It is likely, therefore, that the persisting use of Caucasian will continue to generate unreliable information and contribute to a misinterpretation of Australian populational composition. To the authors' knowledge, the persistent use of Caucasian as a demographic descriptor has never been questioned in the Australian scientific literature. It is hoped that the argument presented herein will prompt further debate and development regarding this critical issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书