Open Review of Educational Research最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Discourse, Complexity, Normativity: Tracing the elaboration of Foucault's materialist concept of discourse 话语、复杂性、规范性:追溯福柯唯物主义话语概念的阐述
Open Review of Educational Research Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2014.964296
M. Olssen
{"title":"Discourse, Complexity, Normativity: Tracing the elaboration of Foucault's materialist concept of discourse","authors":"M. Olssen","doi":"10.1080/23265507.2014.964296","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2014.964296","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, I want to suggest that it is through the elaboration of the concept of discourse that the differences between Foucault and thinkers like Habermas, Hegel and Marx can best be understood. Foucault progressively develops a conception of discourse as a purely historical category that resists all reference to transcendental principles of unity—whether of substance or form—but sees the emergence of discursive frameworks as precarious and contested assemblages characterized by indeterminacy, complexity, openness, uncertainty and contingency. His approach thus enables a reconciliation of difference and commonality, or the particular and the general, in a distinctive and viable way.","PeriodicalId":43562,"journal":{"name":"Open Review of Educational Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"28 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23265507.2014.964296","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59994829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Scientific Representation and Science Learning 科学表征与科学学习
Open Review of Educational Research Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2014.989900
Corrado Matta
{"title":"Scientific Representation and Science Learning","authors":"Corrado Matta","doi":"10.1080/23265507.2014.989900","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2014.989900","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article I examine three examples of philosophical theories of scientific representation with the aim of assessing which of these is a good candidate for a philosophical theory of scientific representation in science learning. The three candidate theories are Giere's intentional approach, Suárez's inferential approach and Lynch and Woolgar's sociological approach. In order to assess which theory is more promising, I will compare the three candidate theories to two aspects of scientific representation in science learning that emerge from empirical research on science learning. I label these aspects as the intentional and normative character of scientific representation in science learning. As I argue, whereas the other competing accounts of scientific representation can only capture one of the two aspects highlighted in this article, the inferential conception has the capacity to capture them both in a coherent way. Thus, I conclude that the inferential conception seems to be a fruitful philosophical theory of scientific representation in science learning.","PeriodicalId":43562,"journal":{"name":"Open Review of Educational Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"211 - 231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23265507.2014.989900","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59994911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信