TEXTILE HISTORY最新文献_第10页

Craft 工艺

IF 1 2区社会学

TEXTILE HISTORY Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/00404969.2019.1655939

Amanda Thatch

引用次数: 16

Dyes and Dyeing 染料与染色

IF 1 2区社会学

TEXTILE HISTORY Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/00404969.2019.1660062

Susan Kay-Williams

引用次数: 0

Cabbage, Tradition and Bunce: Marion Donaldson and the Black Economy of the British Rag Trade in the 1970s 《卷心菜、传统和弹跳:马里恩·唐纳森和20世纪70年代英国布匹贸易的黑色经济》

IF 1 2区社会学

TEXTILE HISTORY Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/00404969.2019.1652134

J. Halbert

引用次数: 2

‘Liberty Art Fabrics & Fashion’, Dovecot Gallery, Dovecot Studios, Edinburgh, UK, 28 July 2018–12 January 2019 “Liberty Art Fabrics&Fashion”，英国爱丁堡Dovecot工作室Dovecot画廊，2018年7月28日至2019年1月12日

IF 1 2区社会学

TEXTILE HISTORY Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/00404969.2019.1654229

Lucy McConnell

引用次数: 1

Fashion 时尚

IF 1 2区社会学

TEXTILE HISTORY Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/00404969.2019.1655937

C. Breward

{"title":"Fashion","authors":"C. Breward","doi":"10.1080/00404969.2019.1655937","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00404969.2019.1655937","url":null,"abstract":"Fashion is a form of imitation and so of social equalization, but, paradoxically, in changing incessantly, it differentiates one time from another and one social stratum from another. It unites those of a social class and segregates them from others. The elite initiates a fashion and, when the mass imitates it in an effort to obliterate the external distinctions of class, abandons it for a newer mode-a process that quickens with the increase of wealth. Fashion does not exist in tribal and classless societies. It concerns externals and superficialities where irrationality does no harm. It signalizes the lack of personal freedom; hence it characterizes the female and the middle class, whose increased social freedom is matched by intense individual subjugation. Some forms are intrinsically more suited to the modifications of fashion than others: the internal unity of the forms called \"classic\" makes them immune to change. The general formula in accordance with which we usually interpret the differing aspects of the individual as well as of the public mind may be stated broadly as follows: We recognize two antagonistic forces, tendencies, or characteristics, either of which, if left unaffected, would approach infinity; and it is by the mutual limitation of the two forces that the characteristics of the individual and public mind result. We are constantly seeking ultimate forces, fundamental aspirations, some one of which controls our entire conduct. But in no case do we find any single force attaining a perfectly independent expression, and we are thus obliged to separate a majority of the factors and determine the relative extent to which each shall have representation. To do this we must establish the degree of limitation exercised by the counteraction of some other force, as well as the influence exerted by the latter upon the primlitive force. Man has ever had a dualistic nature. This fact, however, has had but little effect on the uniformity of his conduct, and this uniformity is usually the result of a number of elements. An action that results from less than a majority of fundamental forces would appear barren and empty. Over an old Flemish house there stands the mystical inscription, \"There is more within me\"; and this is the formula according to which the first impression of an action is supplemented by a farreaching diversity of causes. Human life cannot hope to develop a wealth of inexhaustible possibilities until we come to recognize in every moment and content of existence a pair of forces, each one of which, in striving to go beyond the initial point, has resolved the infinity of the other by mutual impingement into mere tension and desire. While the explanation of some aspects of the soul as the result of the action of two fundamental forces satisfies the theoretical instinct, it furthermore adds a new charm to the image of things, not only by tracing distinctly the outlines of the fact, but also by I International Quarterly (New York)","PeriodicalId":43311,"journal":{"name":"TEXTILE HISTORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00404969.2019.1655937","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49291527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 263

‘Fabric in Fashion’, The Museum at FIT, New York, USA, 4 December 2018–4 May 2019 “面料时尚”，FIT博物馆，纽约，美国，2018年12月4日- 2019年5月4日

IF 1 2区社会学

TEXTILE HISTORY Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/00404969.2019.1654228

Cynthia E. Chin

引用次数: 0

Alan Powers, Enid Marx: The Pleasures of Pattern 艾伦·鲍尔斯，《伊妮德·马克思:模式的乐趣》

IF 1 2区社会学

TEXTILE HISTORY Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/00404969.2019.1653643

F. Hackney

引用次数: 0

‘Mary Quant’, Victoria and Albert Museum, London, UK, 6 April 2019–16 February 2020 “玛丽·匡特”，维多利亚和阿尔伯特博物馆，英国伦敦，2019年4月6日至2020年2月16日