Netherlands International Law Review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Due Diligence in International Environmental Law and International Human Rights Law: A Comparative Legal Study of the Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement and Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights 国际环境法和国际人权法中的尽职调查:《巴黎协定》下国家自主贡献与《欧洲人权公约》下积极义务的比较法律研究
IF 0.9
Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2021-04-28 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-021-00188-5
Medes Malaihollo
{"title":"Due Diligence in International Environmental Law and International Human Rights Law: A Comparative Legal Study of the Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement and Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights","authors":"Medes Malaihollo","doi":"10.1007/s40802-021-00188-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-021-00188-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due diligence is a frequently employed notion in international law, yet much is still to be explored about this concept. This article aims to contribute to an understanding of due diligence obligations in international law, which is useful as it can form the basis for a further clarification of corresponding legal rights of subjects of international law. With this purpose in mind, this article initiates the construction of a working model of due diligence in international law by exploring this notion from two perspectives: an accountability perspective and a regulatory perspective. Subsequently, this article will use this model to compare the operation of due diligence obligations in two branches of international law: international environmental law and international human rights law. In doing so, it will become clear that due diligence contains two core elements: ‘reasonableness’ and ‘good faith’. Moreover, it will become apparent that the operation of due diligence obligations in these two branches has implications for systemic issues in international law. Further research on the operation of due diligence obligations in other branches of international law is therefore recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":43288,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands International Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138541047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Hague Case Law: Latest Developments 海牙判例法:最新发展
IF 0.9
Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2021-04-21 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-021-00187-6
A. Meijknecht
{"title":"Hague Case Law: Latest Developments","authors":"A. Meijknecht","doi":"10.1007/s40802-021-00187-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-021-00187-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43288,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands International Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2021-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40802-021-00187-6","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47773936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Community Interest and the International Public Legal Order 共同体利益与国际公法秩序
IF 0.9
Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2021-04-19 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-021-00186-7
Sarah Thin
{"title":"Community Interest and the International Public Legal Order","authors":"Sarah Thin","doi":"10.1007/s40802-021-00186-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-021-00186-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43288,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands International Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40802-021-00186-7","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41971871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Treaty-text Loyalists’ Burden with Subsequent State Practice 条约文本忠实者对后续国家实践的负担
IF 0.9
Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2021-04-06 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-021-00185-8
Benedict Abrahamson Chigara
{"title":"Treaty-text Loyalists’ Burden with Subsequent State Practice","authors":"Benedict Abrahamson Chigara","doi":"10.1007/s40802-021-00185-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-021-00185-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The role of subsequent state practice in the procedural law of treaties, and in the determination of consent in the implementation of treaties have become the subject of much scholarly debate in recent times. The UN International Law Commission has devoted copious amounts of study time into these issues under the distinguished guidance of Georg Nolte as Special Rapporteur. Ph.D. theses and research monographs, journal articles and commentaries have appeared on the matter, but the debate persists. At one end of this debate are treaty-text loyalists that reject the potential of subsequent state practice to modify what they regard as ‘solemn oaths’ taken by states when they conclude and adopt a treaty. That ‘temporal declaration of consent’ by states to be bound by a treaty regime is for them sacrosanct. At the other end are analytical jurisprudence scholars who appear to insist upon a purpose test approach to the matter. This article evaluates treaty-text loyalists’ arguments under current state practice on treaty implementation across a number of disciplines. It shows that the view that ‘temporal consent’ supremely prohibits the modification of treaties through subsequent state practice is exaggerated. Moreover, the ‘solemn oaths’ perception of treaties is not supported by recent examples of treaty implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":43288,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands International Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138541048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Legal Consequences of Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law 国际法中普遍义务的法律后果
IF 0.9
Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-021-00184-9
Yoshifumi Tanaka
{"title":"The Legal Consequences of Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law","authors":"Yoshifumi Tanaka","doi":"10.1007/s40802-021-00184-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-021-00184-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p>While obligations <i>erga omnes</i> have increasingly been referred to in the jurisprudence, the legal consequences of those obligations are not adequately clarified in international law. Thus this article explores the legal effects of obligations <i>erga omnes</i> in general international law. After an examination of the criteria for the identification of obligations <i>erga omnes</i>, this article considers three possible legal consequences of those obligations: (1) the obligation not to recognize illegal situations, (2) third-party countermeasures, and (3) the <i>locus standi</i> of not directly injured States in response to a breach of obligations <i>erga omnes</i>. There is little doubt that the concept of obligations <i>erga omnes</i> is key in protecting the fundamental values and common interests of the international community as a whole or community interests. However, it cannot pass unnoticed that the legal effects of obligations <i>erga omnes</i> can be restricted by several factors. In this sense, it may have to be admitted that the concept of obligations <i>erga omnes</i> remains ambivalent as a means of protecting community interests in international law.</p>","PeriodicalId":43288,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands International Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138541059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
China’s Stance on Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Evolution, Challenges, and Reform Options 中国解决投资者与国家争端的立场:演变、挑战与改革选择
IF 0.9
Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-020-00182-3
Yuwen Li, Cheng Bian
{"title":"China’s Stance on Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Evolution, Challenges, and Reform Options","authors":"Yuwen Li, Cheng Bian","doi":"10.1007/s40802-020-00182-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-020-00182-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43288,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands International Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40802-020-00182-3","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49282351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Hague Case Law: Latest Developments 海牙判例法:最新发展
IF 0.9
Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-020-00181-4
A. Meijknecht
{"title":"Hague Case Law: Latest Developments","authors":"A. Meijknecht","doi":"10.1007/s40802-020-00181-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-020-00181-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43288,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands International Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40802-020-00181-4","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45233881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Allies or Foes? A Review of the Relationship between the International Criminal Court and the United Nations Security Council 盟友还是敌人?审查国际刑事法院与联合国安全理事会之间的关系
IF 0.9
Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-020-00183-2
Lloyd T. Chigowe
{"title":"Allies or Foes? A Review of the Relationship between the International Criminal Court and the United Nations Security Council","authors":"Lloyd T. Chigowe","doi":"10.1007/s40802-020-00183-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-020-00183-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43288,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands International Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40802-020-00183-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43709537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
W.A. Schabas, Nowak’s CCPR Commentary: U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 3rd rev. edn. 《诺瓦克的公民权利和政治权利评注:联合国公民权利和政治权利公约》,第3修订版。
IF 0.9
Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2020-11-05 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-020-00179-y
Alfred de Zayas
{"title":"W.A. Schabas, Nowak’s CCPR Commentary: U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 3rd rev. edn.","authors":"Alfred de Zayas","doi":"10.1007/s40802-020-00179-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-020-00179-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43288,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands International Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40802-020-00179-y","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"52947761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
T. Squatrito, O.R. Young, A. Follesdal, and G. Ulfstein (eds.), The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals T. Squatrito, O.R. Young, A. Follesdal和G. Ulfstein(编),《国际法院和法庭的绩效》
IF 0.9
Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2020-11-02 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-020-00178-z
L. Lonardo
{"title":"T. Squatrito, O.R. Young, A. Follesdal, and G. Ulfstein (eds.), The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals","authors":"L. Lonardo","doi":"10.1007/s40802-020-00178-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-020-00178-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43288,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands International Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2020-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40802-020-00178-z","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45822621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信