Netherlands International Law Review最新文献_第7页

Standards of Review for the Non-Precluded Measures Clause in Investment Treaties: Different Wording, Different Levels of Scrutiny 投资条约中不排除措施条款的审查标准：不同措辞、不同审查级别

IF 0.9

Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2021-08-24 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-021-00196-5

Mir-Hossein Abedian Kalkhoran, Habib Sabzevari

引用次数: 0

Hague Case Law: Latest Developments 海牙判例法:最新发展

IF 0.9

Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2021-08-23 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-021-00195-6

Anna Meijknecht

引用次数: 0

Jurisdiction and Combatant’s Privilege in the MH17 Trial: Treading the Line Between Domestic and International Criminal Justice MH17审判中的管辖权和作战人员特权：跨越国内外刑事司法的界限

IF 0.9

Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2021-08-19 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-021-00193-8

Lachezar D. Yanev

引用次数: 0

Correction to: The Nomination of International Judges by ‘the Enlightened Few’: A Comment on the Royal Decree of 23 January 2020 Concerning the Establishment of a Dutch National Group at the Permanent Court of Arbitration 更正:“少数开明人士”提名国际法官:对2020年1月23日关于在常设仲裁法院设立荷兰国家小组的皇家法令的评论

IF 0.9

Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-021-00191-w

Remy Jorritsma

引用次数: 0

Due Diligence in International Environmental Law and International Human Rights Law: A Comparative Legal Study of the Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement and Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights 国际环境法和国际人权法中的尽职调查:《巴黎协定》下国家自主贡献与《欧洲人权公约》下积极义务的比较法律研究

IF 0.9

Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2021-04-28 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-021-00188-5

Medes Malaihollo

{"title":"Due Diligence in International Environmental Law and International Human Rights Law: A Comparative Legal Study of the Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement and Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights","authors":"Medes Malaihollo","doi":"10.1007/s40802-021-00188-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-021-00188-5","url":null,"abstract":"Due diligence is a frequently employed notion in international law, yet much is still to be explored about this concept. This article aims to contribute to an understanding of due diligence obligations in international law, which is useful as it can form the basis for a further clarification of corresponding legal rights of subjects of international law. With this purpose in mind, this article initiates the construction of a working model of due diligence in international law by exploring this notion from two perspectives: an accountability perspective and a regulatory perspective. Subsequently, this article will use this model to compare the operation of due diligence obligations in two branches of international law: international environmental law and international human rights law. In doing so, it will become clear that due diligence contains two core elements: ‘reasonableness’ and ‘good faith’. Moreover, it will become apparent that the operation of due diligence obligations in these two branches has implications for systemic issues in international law. Further research on the operation of due diligence obligations in other branches of international law is therefore recommended.","PeriodicalId":43288,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands International Law Review","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138541047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Hague Case Law: Latest Developments 海牙判例法:最新发展

IF 0.9

Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2021-04-21 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-021-00187-6

A. Meijknecht

引用次数: 0

Community Interest and the International Public Legal Order 共同体利益与国际公法秩序

IF 0.9

Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2021-04-19 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-021-00186-7

Sarah Thin

引用次数: 2

Treaty-text Loyalists’ Burden with Subsequent State Practice 条约文本忠实者对后续国家实践的负担

IF 0.9

Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2021-04-06 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-021-00185-8

Benedict Abrahamson Chigara

{"title":"Treaty-text Loyalists’ Burden with Subsequent State Practice","authors":"Benedict Abrahamson Chigara","doi":"10.1007/s40802-021-00185-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-021-00185-8","url":null,"abstract":"The role of subsequent state practice in the procedural law of treaties, and in the determination of consent in the implementation of treaties have become the subject of much scholarly debate in recent times. The UN International Law Commission has devoted copious amounts of study time into these issues under the distinguished guidance of Georg Nolte as Special Rapporteur. Ph.D. theses and research monographs, journal articles and commentaries have appeared on the matter, but the debate persists. At one end of this debate are treaty-text loyalists that reject the potential of subsequent state practice to modify what they regard as ‘solemn oaths’ taken by states when they conclude and adopt a treaty. That ‘temporal declaration of consent’ by states to be bound by a treaty regime is for them sacrosanct. At the other end are analytical jurisprudence scholars who appear to insist upon a purpose test approach to the matter. This article evaluates treaty-text loyalists’ arguments under current state practice on treaty implementation across a number of disciplines. It shows that the view that ‘temporal consent’ supremely prohibits the modification of treaties through subsequent state practice is exaggerated. Moreover, the ‘solemn oaths’ perception of treaties is not supported by recent examples of treaty implementation.","PeriodicalId":43288,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands International Law Review","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138541048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Legal Consequences of Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law 国际法中普遍义务的法律后果

IF 0.9

Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-021-00184-9

Yoshifumi Tanaka

{"title":"The Legal Consequences of Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law","authors":"Yoshifumi Tanaka","doi":"10.1007/s40802-021-00184-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-021-00184-9","url":null,"abstract":"While obligations erga omnes have increasingly been referred to in the jurisprudence, the legal consequences of those obligations are not adequately clarified in international law. Thus this article explores the legal effects of obligations erga omnes in general international law. After an examination of the criteria for the identification of obligations erga omnes, this article considers three possible legal consequences of those obligations: (1) the obligation not to recognize illegal situations, (2) third-party countermeasures, and (3) the locus standi of not directly injured States in response to a breach of obligations erga omnes. There is little doubt that the concept of obligations erga omnes is key in protecting the fundamental values and common interests of the international community as a whole or community interests. However, it cannot pass unnoticed that the legal effects of obligations erga omnes can be restricted by several factors. In this sense, it may have to be admitted that the concept of obligations erga omnes remains ambivalent as a means of protecting community interests in international law.","PeriodicalId":43288,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands International Law Review","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138541059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

China’s Stance on Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Evolution, Challenges, and Reform Options 中国解决投资者与国家争端的立场：演变、挑战与改革选择

IF 0.9

Netherlands International Law Review Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40802-020-00182-3

Yuwen Li, Cheng Bian

引用次数: 4