发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Manuscrito最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
“Believing at will is possible”−or is it? Some remarks on Peels’s “truth depends on belief” cases and voluntariness “随心所欲地相信是可能的”——真的是这样吗?对皮尔斯的“真理依赖于信念”案例和自愿性的一些评论
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
Manuscrito Pub Date : 2023-07-21 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.cv
Claudio Cormick, Valeria Edelszten
{"title":"“Believing at will is possible”−or is it? Some remarks on Peels’s “truth depends on belief” cases and voluntariness","authors":"Claudio Cormick, Valeria Edelszten","doi":"10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.cv","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.cv","url":null,"abstract":": This article discusses Rik Peels's response to Williams's argument against voluntary belief. Williams argues that voluntary beliefs must be acquired independently of truth-considerations, so they cannot count as beliefs after all, since beliefs aim at truth. Peels attempted to reply by showing that in cases of self-fulfilling","PeriodicalId":42903,"journal":{"name":"Manuscrito","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67415565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ON THE ALLEGED ERROR OF FORMAL OBJECTIONS TO NORMATIVE ERROR THEORY 论所谓的形式错误对规范错误理论的反对
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
Manuscrito Pub Date : 2023-07-21 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.jj
J. J. Joaquin
{"title":"ON THE ALLEGED ERROR OF FORMAL OBJECTIONS TO NORMATIVE ERROR THEORY","authors":"J. J. Joaquin","doi":"10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.jj","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.jj","url":null,"abstract":": According to Streumer and Wodak, a particular type of formal objection to normative error theory fails because it rests on a questionable assumption about the logical duality of the normative concepts of permissibility and impermissibility. In this discussion, we argue that there is an error in their indictment; as such, the formal objection to normative error theory might still prevail.","PeriodicalId":42903,"journal":{"name":"Manuscrito","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67416261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Korsgaard's Expanded Regress Argument Korsgaard的展开回归论证
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
Manuscrito Pub Date : 2023-07-21 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.sk
S. Kahn
{"title":"Korsgaard's Expanded Regress Argument","authors":"S. Kahn","doi":"10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.sk","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.sk","url":null,"abstract":": In this discussion note, I aim to reconstruct and assess Korsgaard's recent attempt to extend her regress argument. I begin, in section 1, with a brief recapitulation of the regress argument. Then, in section 2, I turn to the extension. I argue that the extension does not work because Korsgaard cannot rule out the possibility--a possibility for which there is both empirical evidence and argumentative pressure coming directly from the original regress--that we value animality in ourselves qua animality of rational beings.","PeriodicalId":42903,"journal":{"name":"Manuscrito","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67416416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
THE STATUS OF ARGUMENTS IN ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS. A TABLEAUX METHOD 论证在抽象论证框架中的地位。场景法
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
Manuscrito Pub Date : 2023-07-21 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.ge
G. Bodanza, Enrique HERNÁNDEZ-MANFREDINI
{"title":"THE STATUS OF ARGUMENTS IN ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS. A TABLEAUX METHOD","authors":"G. Bodanza, Enrique HERNÁNDEZ-MANFREDINI","doi":"10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.ge","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.ge","url":null,"abstract":": Dung’s argumentation frameworks are formalisms widely used to model interaction among arguments. Although their study has been profusely developed in the field of Artificial Intelligence, it is not common to see its treatment among those less connected to computer science within the logical-philosophical community. In this paper we propose to bring to that audience a proof-theory for argument justification based on tableaux, very similar to those the Logic students are familiar with. The tableaux enable to calculate whether an argument or subset of arguments are accepted or rejected in accordance to Dung’s preferred and grounded extension-based semantics. Sound-ness and completeness results regarding those semantics are provided.","PeriodicalId":42903,"journal":{"name":"Manuscrito","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67415622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Definition and Typological Model of a Dogwhistle 狗哨的定义和类型模型
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
Manuscrito Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n3.kw
Kim Witten
{"title":"The Definition and Typological Model of a Dogwhistle","authors":"Kim Witten","doi":"10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n3.kw","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n3.kw","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42903,"journal":{"name":"Manuscrito","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45433418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Between Thinking and Acting Fichte’s Deduction of the Concept of Right 在思维与行动之间——费特对权利概念的演绎
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
Manuscrito Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.lr
Laurenz Ramsauer
{"title":"Between Thinking and Acting Fichte’s Deduction of the Concept of Right","authors":"Laurenz Ramsauer","doi":"10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.lr","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.lr","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42903,"journal":{"name":"Manuscrito","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45706165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
BOOK REVIEW: TODD, P. The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False. Oxford University Press, (Oxford 2021, 224 pp). 《开放的未来:为什么未来偶然事件都是假的》。牛津大学出版社，(Oxford 2021, 224页)。
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
Manuscrito Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n1.af
Aldo Frigerio
{"title":"BOOK REVIEW: TODD, P. The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False. Oxford University Press, (Oxford 2021, 224 pp).","authors":"Aldo Frigerio","doi":"10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n1.af","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n1.af","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42903,"journal":{"name":"Manuscrito","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44506653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
ONTOLOGY AND THE POLITICAL ABSOLUTE: A CRITICAL READING OF SPINOZA ON WOMEN 本体论与政治绝对:斯宾诺莎对女性的批判性解读
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
Manuscrito Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n1.ec
Eylem Canaslan
{"title":"ONTOLOGY AND THE POLITICAL ABSOLUTE: A CRITICAL READING OF SPINOZA ON WOMEN","authors":"Eylem Canaslan","doi":"10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n1.ec","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n1.ec","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42903,"journal":{"name":"Manuscrito","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44280271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SUTTON’S SOLUTION TO THE GROUNDING PROBLEM 萨顿解决禁足问题的方法
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
Manuscrito Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n1.ez
Ezequiel Zerbudis
{"title":"SUTTON’S SOLUTION TO THE GROUNDING PROBLEM","authors":"Ezequiel Zerbudis","doi":"10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n1.ez","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n1.ez","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42903,"journal":{"name":"Manuscrito","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42254488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SOCRATIC IGNORANCE, INTELLECTUAL HUMILITY AND INTELLECTUAL AUTONOMY 苏格拉底的无知、知识分子的谦逊与知识分子的自主
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
Manuscrito Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n1.lm
Leandro de Brasi, Marcelo D. Boeri
{"title":"SOCRATIC IGNORANCE, INTELLECTUAL HUMILITY AND INTELLECTUAL AUTONOMY","authors":"Leandro de Brasi, Marcelo D. Boeri","doi":"10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n1.lm","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n1.lm","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42903,"journal":{"name":"Manuscrito","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42694671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信