Cuadernos de Bioetica最新文献_第7页

[Transhumanism and desire: phenomenological approach]. [超人类主义与欲望:现象学方法]。

IF 0.5

Cuadernos de Bioetica Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI: 10.30444/CB.95

David García Díaz

引用次数: 0

[Human nature in the Aristotelian-Thomist tradition: a brief exposition]. [亚里士多德-托马斯主义传统中的人性:简要阐述]。

IF 0.5

Cuadernos de Bioetica Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI: 10.30444/CB.101

Ángel Sánchez-Palencia Martí

引用次数: 0

[Transhumanism and law: from human nature to self-determination as the foundation of human rights]. [超人类主义与法律:从人性到作为人权基础的自决]。

IF 0.5

Cuadernos de Bioetica Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI: 10.30444/CB.100

María Lacalle Noriega

引用次数: 0

[Organic Law 3/2021 on regulation of Euthanasia: A dehumanizing law?] 关于安乐死监管的第3/2021号组织法:一项不人道的法律?］

IF 0.5

Cuadernos de Bioetica Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI: 10.30444/CB.102

Roberto Germán Zurriaráin

{"title":"[Organic Law 3/2021 on regulation of Euthanasia: A dehumanizing law?]","authors":"Roberto Germán Zurriaráin","doi":"10.30444/CB.102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30444/CB.102","url":null,"abstract":"The Spanish Congress of Deputies has approved the law regulating euthanasia. Precisely, the article deals at the statements made by its defenders. These revolve around the following concepts: dignity, right, freedom and, finally, pain-suffering. Human dignity is the individual and social principle par excellence and from which the other three are derived. For this reason, by defending the dignity that the human being possesses, simply, by the fact of being it, it is against said Law. Human dignity is not destroyed by terminal illness, or by dependency, suffering, weakness or frailty. Each human life has value in itself, which must be safeguarded and which makes it non-negotiable in all situations and conditions. That the non-negotiable value of life sustains any democratic system. However, the supposed right to euthanasia is typical of an individualistic and reductionist vision of the human being and his life; and of a freedom detached both from the goodness or badness of the choice and action carried out, and from the responsibility towards the lives of others. Faced with offering euthanasia, as the only solution to the suffering of people in the last stage of their life, quality palliative care should be proposed. These are the only ethical option, consistent with respect for human dignity. Respecting, valuing, caring for, and attending to vulnerable and fragile human life means progress in humanity.","PeriodicalId":42510,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","volume":"32 105","pages":"251-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39433000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

[Transhumanism, human enhancement and bioethical challenges of emerging technologies for the 21st century]. [21世纪新兴技术的超人类主义、人类增强和生物伦理挑战]。

IF 0.5

Cuadernos de Bioetica Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI: 10.30444/CB.92

Elena Postigo Solano

引用次数: 1

[Historical genesis of transhumanism: evolution of an idea]. [超人类主义的历史起源:一种思想的演变]。

IF 0.5

Cuadernos de Bioetica Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI: 10.30444/CB.93

Rafael Monterde Ferrando

引用次数: 0

[The application of technoscience to man: ethical discernment in relation to the transhumanist-posthumanist proposal]. [技术科学对人类的应用:与超人类主义-后人类主义建议相关的伦理辨析]。

IF 0.5

Cuadernos de Bioetica Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI: 10.30444/CB.97

Luis Miguel Pastor

{"title":"[The application of technoscience to man: ethical discernment in relation to the transhumanist-posthumanist proposal].","authors":"Luis Miguel Pastor","doi":"10.30444/CB.97","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30444/CB.97","url":null,"abstract":"Transhumanism-posthumanism is a current of thought that appears closely linked to the development of technoscience and its application to man. At the same time that this current must be subject to criticism, an anthropological and ethical paradigm must be illuminated that allows accepting or not the new technoscientific advances, making a discernment between them. Such discernment should lead us to weigh the goodness of these advances, rejecting only those that represent a degradation of the human being, and accepting those that help man to be more fully man. To do this, the article proposes starting the discernment from an ethical principle such as respect for the integrity of man. Together with him, it is necessary to act with caution regarding human health, considered in relation to his psychosomatic unity. It will also be necessary to avoid deriving the ethics of the advances from the same technoscience. Finally, discernment requires, ultimately, starting from an idea about what man is, proposing the need to do so from a dual rather than dualistic conception of the human person. Based on all of the above, various ethical criteria are indicated in the work that complete the principle of respect for human integrity indicated above: respect and promote human life in all its dimensions, use of technology at the service of human beings in a controlled manner and that report social benefit or value by each technique, not only from a therapeutic perspective, but also from the improvement of the human psychosomatic unit. In conclusion, it is necessary to recognize in man the uniqueness of him as he is a bodily being who knows and loves in freedom, whose ends are not limited to material or sensible things, but which are only achievable in and from his own material condition. Consequently, any techno-scientific intervention that substantially alters his body condition is inhuman, not instead when it repairs or enhances -without abolishing them- his own qualities.","PeriodicalId":42510,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","volume":"32 105","pages":"183-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39432520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

[Guidelines for the ethical assessment of interventions on the human body in view of the emergence of NBIC technologies for enhancement]. [考虑到NBIC增强技术的出现对人体干预的伦理评估指南]。

IF 0.5

Cuadernos de Bioetica Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI: 10.30444/CB.98

Esperanza Marín Conde, Lucía Gómez Tatay

{"title":"[Guidelines for the ethical assessment of interventions on the human body in view of the emergence of NBIC technologies for enhancement].","authors":"Esperanza Marín Conde, Lucía Gómez Tatay","doi":"10.30444/CB.98","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30444/CB.98","url":null,"abstract":"The recent development of NBIC technologies has led to the emergence of new techniques that allow the modification of genetic, morphological, and physiological aspects of the human being to improve their capacities. In light of this situation, the eternal debate continues: is everything technically possible ethically acceptable? To answer this question, an ethical reflection is needed to assess the scope of enhancement techniques and to direct them to the service of human progress and the common good. Many authors have already begun this reflection, opting for a case-by-case evaluation. However, there is a great lack of specificity in the definition of the criteria that would allow an ethical analysis of each technique, in order to determine the licitness of its application. In response to this need, a practical guide for the ethical assessment of not only human enhancement techniques, but of any intervention on the human body is proposed. This guide is based on the four principles of personalist bioethics proposed by Sgreccia: the principle of defense of physical human life, the principle of totality or the therapeutic principle, the principle of freedom and responsibility, and the principle of sociability and subsidiarity. These principles are the common thread of some questionnaires that serve as support in discerning the licitness of a technique, by virtue of the overall good of the person in their three-dimensional structure: body, mind and spirit, and the respect for their inalienable dignity.","PeriodicalId":42510,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","volume":"32 105","pages":"195-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39433094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

[Posfeminist and transhumanism: a historical relationship]. [后女权主义和超人类主义:一种历史关系]。

IF 0.5

Cuadernos de Bioetica Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI: 10.30444/CB.96

Sagrario Crespo Garrido

引用次数: 0

[Two approches to vulnerability: Bostrom's transhumanism and an anthropology focused on the human being]. [脆弱性的两种途径:博斯特罗姆的超人类主义和关注人类的人类学]。

IF 0.5

Cuadernos de Bioetica Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI: 10.30444/CB.94

Susana Miró López, Carmen de la Calle Maldonado

引用次数: 0