Psychoanalysis Self and Context最新文献_第8页

Destruction, survival and the use of the clinician: Preserving opportunities for selfobject experience in work with challenging patients 破坏，生存和临床医生的使用:在与具有挑战性的病人一起工作时保留自我客体体验的机会

IF 0.3

Psychoanalysis Self and Context Pub Date : 2022-12-08 DOI: 10.1080/24720038.2022.2154772

G. Hagman

{"title":"Destruction, survival and the use of the clinician: Preserving opportunities for selfobject experience in work with challenging patients","authors":"G. Hagman","doi":"10.1080/24720038.2022.2154772","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24720038.2022.2154772","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Many patients resist engagement in the therapeutic relationship because they fear the traumatic consequences of the mobilization of thwarted selfobject needs in what they fear will be a faulty, nonempathic environment. At times this resistance is manifest in “narcissistic rage” as described by Heinz Kohut. Providing opportunities for selfobject experience in work with these patients can be challenging. In his 1971 paper The Use of the Object, D.W. Winnicott described a developmental process in which the state of omnipotent merger with important objects undergoes a transformation in which the other is increasingly recognized as not only outside the self, but also in possession of a subjectivity of its own and thus can be made use of. In work with some seriously and persistently mentally ill, the client’s capacity to make use of the clinician is poorly developed or highly conflicted. Given this the clinical process in which the client achieves the recognition of the worker and trust in their intentions—and hence can make use of them as a selfobject, is often prolonged and stormy. A case is discussed at length that illustrates this. The report documents the importance of holding, containment, management of the countertransference, and survival strategies for the clinician. It also shows the patient’s growing ability to make use of the clinician as a selfobject as she struggles to understand and cope with changes in her life world and self-experience.","PeriodicalId":42308,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalysis Self and Context","volume":"88 1","pages":"14 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89050091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Resting in uncertainty: Estelle Shane in conversation with Jill Gardner on the value of always questioning 在不确定中休息:埃斯特尔·谢恩与吉尔·加德纳关于始终质疑的价值的谈话

IF 0.3

Psychoanalysis Self and Context Pub Date : 2022-11-29 DOI: 10.1080/24720038.2022.2147527

E. Shane, J. Gardner

引用次数: 0

Reflections on Lessons Learned with Arnold Goldberg 反思与阿诺德·戈德堡的经验教训

IF 0.3

Psychoanalysis Self and Context Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI: 10.1080/24720038.2022.2078830

A. Goldberg, R. Shelby

引用次数: 0

Failed Cases 失败的情况下

IF 0.3

Psychoanalysis Self and Context Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI: 10.1080/24720038.2022.2078827

Caryle Perlman

{"title":"Failed Cases","authors":"Caryle Perlman","doi":"10.1080/24720038.2022.2078827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24720038.2022.2078827","url":null,"abstract":"When Arnold Goldberg decided to study treatment failure, he offered a seminar entitled “Failed Cases” at the Chicago Institute for Psychoanalysis. A large number of candidates, graduate analysts, and faculty quickly reworked their schedules so that they might participate. Goldberg’s reputation as a provocative, stimulating and brilliant teacher, combined with the unusual subject, encouraged a large membership. Goldberg asked Brenda Solomon and Caryle Perlman, two author participant members of the long running study group, resulting in the book Errant Selves, to help line up presenters and take notes on the seminar. Lining up presenters was not always an easy task. Most people had mixed feelings about presenting work clearly labeled a “failed case” to a group of their peers. The candidates were perhaps more willing to expose what might be a failure on the grounds of being “just a candidate so it is not surprising I have failed doing this treatment.” The participants of the seminar did not hold back in their myriad responses to the “failed cases.” Such responses ranged from blaming the analyst to blaming the patient, to thinking this was not a failure so no one was to blame, and finally to concluding that this analysis was so inappropriate that failure was inevitable from the start. Some presenters felt traumatized after presenting, even if they said it was useful, while others said it helped them look at the treatment in a completely different way. One said that the whole purpose of the group was a sado-masochistic enactment but she was still glad she had presented. Goldberg never asked for Perlman’s or Solomon’s notes. Instead, he wrote the book on his own. Perhaps he did not want to deal with the enormously time-consuming process of the study group and the multiple case presentations he had lived through. Perhaps he knew this was going to be his last major work and so wanted the liberty to write it in his own eloquent style, on his own timetable, and with his own examples. His examples are, in fact, usually not clear failures but rather demonstrate the struggle of a very experienced analyst engaged in the murky work of psychoanalysis. The book, The Analysis of Failure certainly reflects and comes from the Seminar but the content moves back and forth from the most practical to the most philosophical questions around failure and, as in his other writing, gives us a true sense of the depth of Goldberg’s mind. He utilizes material from many sources that are both close and distant from psychoanalytic thinking. He even uses a Darwin scholar as a reference. He read voraciously and deeply and plays with ideas that, while distant from psychoanalytic theory or practice, shine some light on his ideas about treatment success and failure, and all the grey in between. How are we to understand failure? Failure is the other side of the coin of greatness, the greatness that is a remnant of childhood grandiosity. We hate failure for many reasons but the most powe","PeriodicalId":42308,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalysis Self and Context","volume":"29 1","pages":"330 - 332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91202711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Errant Selves Group “错误自我”组织

IF 0.3

Psychoanalysis Self and Context Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI: 10.1080/24720038.2022.2074011

Brenda Solomon, MD

引用次数: 0

A Pastiche of Brief Memories of Arnold Goldberg 《阿诺德·戈德堡的短暂回忆

IF 0.3

Psychoanalysis Self and Context Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI: 10.1080/24720038.2022.2078831

B. Solomon, M. Dobson

引用次数: 0

Arnold Goldberg: Reflections on his Importance, Teaching, Irascibility, and Humanness 阿诺德·戈德堡:反思他的重要性、教导、暴躁和人性

IF 0.3

Psychoanalysis Self and Context Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI: 10.1080/24720038.2022.2078828

John Hanwell Riker, PhD

引用次数: 0

Remembering Arnie Goldberg 纪念阿尼·戈德堡

IF 0.3

Psychoanalysis Self and Context Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI: 10.1080/24720038.2022.2074008

J. Stern

引用次数: 0

In Memory of Arnold Goldberg 纪念阿诺德·戈德堡

IF 0.3

Psychoanalysis Self and Context Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI: 10.1080/24720038.2022.2078585

引用次数: 0

Arnold Goldberg: A Biographical Memoir 阿诺德·戈德堡:传记回忆录

IF 0.3

Psychoanalysis Self and Context Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI: 10.1080/24720038.2022.2074010

C. Strozier

引用次数: 0