Derecho PUCPPub Date : 2020-11-26DOI: 10.18800/derechopucp.202002.009
Vladimir Rodríguez Cairo
{"title":"Régimen constitucional de la moneda y estabilidad del nivel general de precios en Perú","authors":"Vladimir Rodríguez Cairo","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.202002.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202002.009","url":null,"abstract":"The constitutional regime of currency is one of the most relevant economic institutions in a country because it institutes an order, model, or monetary system aimed to preserve price stability and, thereby, to generate confidence, security, and certainty in the economy. Thus, this research established the implication of the constitutional monetary regime in the general level of prices and individual wellbeing. The study design was nonexperimental because the variables were not manipulated, retrospective because it was based on secondary data, analytical because it was a bivariate analysis and cross-sectional because the data was obtained at a single moment. Likewise, the scope was correlational because of the degree of relationship between the study variables and explanatory since it was determined by the causality that was established between these variables. The currency was founded as a spontaneous order (merchandise money) and a constructed order (fiduciary money), as well as the legal and economic content of the currency’s constitutional regime. The main result was that monetary stability, in addition to being a fundamental right, is a constitutive commitment that fosters the creation of basic values in society, and its preservation has allowed the purchasing power of the currency to be stable for the last twenty seven years, thus contributing to the well-being of the population. Therefore, price stability has been the most relevant achievement of the current monetary regime.","PeriodicalId":41953,"journal":{"name":"Derecho PUCP","volume":"1 1","pages":"277-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45860934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Derecho PUCPPub Date : 2020-11-26DOI: 10.18800/derechopucp.202002.012
Javier Alonso de Belaunde de Cárdenas
{"title":"Holding the line on human rights accountability: Explaining the unlikely judicial overturn of the pardon and immunity granted to human rights violator Alberto Fujimori","authors":"Javier Alonso de Belaunde de Cárdenas","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.202002.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202002.012","url":null,"abstract":"Alberto Fujimori, Peruvian ex-president and perpetrator of human rights violations, was released from prison due to a presidential pardon in 2017. He was also granted immunity from prosecution. Although the political branches and the majority of the population supported these measures, as shown by public opinion polls, within months domestic courts overturned them completely, relying on standards set by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. This is the most unlikely result, comparatively. The article examines what could explain this pro human rights accountability behaviour in the judiciary. It argues that the outcome could be the product of two processes initialised during the Peruvian transition: Judicial empowerment (independence and power gains) and legal culture shift from positivism to neo-constitutionalism. Both are defined and analysed with reference to transitional justice and socio-legal studies scholarship. The article further seeks to identify the conditions under which Inter-American conventionality control doctrine could have a strong domestic impact.","PeriodicalId":41953,"journal":{"name":"Derecho PUCP","volume":"1 1","pages":"413-469"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47315883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Derecho PUCPPub Date : 2020-11-26DOI: 10.18800/derechopucp.202002.001
Javier Sanclemente-Arciniegas
{"title":"Compliance, empresas y corrupción: una mirada internacional","authors":"Javier Sanclemente-Arciniegas","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.202002.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202002.001","url":null,"abstract":"This paper raises a reflection on the legal notion of compliance and the way in which it involves companies in the fight against corruption. That is a new global regulatory trend that provides useful tools to address different legal fields, hence some authors consider it a new branch of law. The notion is articulated around a new conception of companies that tends to effectively engage them with the protection of legally relevant values. These postulates are especially relevant in the fight against corruption. In this area, the tendency to establish private economic power as an agent in the service of the protection of the general interest is clearly manifested. For this, on one hand, the common legislative movement at the international level is analyzed, identifying norms that have been adopted by different states in the world in order to involve companies in the fight against corruption. On the other hand, we analyze the normative and institutional devices that companies have adopted in order to meeting those obligations. There we highlight the way in which companies are transformed from entities dedicated to obtaining particular benefits to actors that serve interests of the whole society, when addressing the risk of regulatory non-compliance.","PeriodicalId":41953,"journal":{"name":"Derecho PUCP","volume":"1 1","pages":"9-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49182571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Derecho PUCPPub Date : 2020-05-29DOI: 10.18800/derechopucp.202001.004
Pablo Marshall, Y. Zúñiga
{"title":"Objeción de conciencia y aborto en Chile","authors":"Pablo Marshall, Y. Zúñiga","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.202001.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.004","url":null,"abstract":"This paper critically analyzes conscientious objection in the context of the new regulation of pregnancy termination in Chile. It affirms that adequate regulation should not be blind to the hostile context in which abortion rights have been enacted and the difficulties experienced. The bioethical requirements that seek to balance the interests involved must consider the legal regulation of the interests at stake, the context in which they are implemented and, fundamentally, the effectiveness of the solutions adopted. Attention should be paid to the risks involved in the proliferation of objections that are not serious and to the political use of conscientious objection to prevent the implementation of women’s reproductive rights. In describing the process of entrenchment, strengthening and expansion of the conscientious objection in Chile, we show how this process has overprotected consciousness and the risks of undermining the effectiveness of the new abortion law, hindering and dilating the enjoyment of rights entrenched by the law. In response, regulatory measures are proposed to reverse this situation, which are obtained mainly from the bioethical literature on the subject and that look at the adverse context of the guarantee of women’s sexual and reproductive rights.","PeriodicalId":41953,"journal":{"name":"Derecho PUCP","volume":"1 1","pages":"99-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44824157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Derecho PUCPPub Date : 2020-05-29DOI: 10.18800/derechopucp.202001.013
Fernando Del Mastro Puccio
{"title":"La enseñanza del derecho frente al pasado de sus estudiantes","authors":"Fernando Del Mastro Puccio","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.202001.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.013","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we conduct a qualitative analysis of law students’ experiences with authorities when they were high school students. Through a psychoanalytical framework, we seek to understand the relational dynamics underlying those experiences and their possible impact in the construction of the law students’ «regulatory self», that is, in the way they live within regulatory systems. Then we explore the different manners in which that past could be present in the way law students live legal education and then their profession. Finally, we suggest diverse attitudes that law schools’ authorities, professors and students can develop in order to avoid authoritarian relational dynamics and to construct a «regulatory ethos» which can contribute to the growth of students’ «regulatory self».","PeriodicalId":41953,"journal":{"name":"Derecho PUCP","volume":"1 1","pages":"393-442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44382324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Derecho PUCPPub Date : 2020-05-29DOI: 10.18800/derechopucp.202001.001
Trilce Gabriela Valdivia Aguilar
{"title":"¿Sospechar para igualar? Un análisis «estricto» de la doctrina de las categorías sospechosas a partir de la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional peruano y la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos","authors":"Trilce Gabriela Valdivia Aguilar","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.202001.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.001","url":null,"abstract":"This paper is an introductory study of the doctrine of suspect classifications based on the case law of the Peruvian Constitutional Court and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. It aims to describe the special features of this doctrine as well as to critically analyze its proposed justification and the consequences of its application: The strict scrutiny test. To achieve this purpose, this work describes the case law in which both courts have explicitly mentioned this doctrine. Based on this study, the author identifies that the foundation of this doctrine lies in the notion of equality as recognition of vulnerable groups and that both tribunals have established as its main effect the application of a strict scrutiny test. Finally, the author critically assesses these jurisprudential findings.","PeriodicalId":41953,"journal":{"name":"Derecho PUCP","volume":"1 1","pages":"9-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44429041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Derecho PUCPPub Date : 2020-05-29DOI: 10.18800/derechopucp.202001.010
Álvaro Núñez Vaquero
{"title":"¿Violan los precedentes la IJI? Desencuentros desde la incomprensión","authors":"Álvaro Núñez Vaquero","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.202001.010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.010","url":null,"abstract":"This work aims to clarify, from the point of view of the analytical theory of law, the question of whether the existence of judicial precedents in a legal system necessarily implies a violation of the internal judicial independence (IJI). To answer the question, we will try to clarify the way in which the IJI is being understood to affirm that it would be affected by the presence of a system of precedents (SP’s). It will proceed as follows: First, it will start by making explicit the reasons why it is necessary to deal with this problem. Secondly, it will be specified what it means that there is a binding SP’s. Third, it will explain what judicial independence consists of, presenting the reasons that justify the IJI: respect for the will of the legislator and equality in the application of law. Next, I will present three aspects of the IJI that could clash with the presence of an SP’s. In the fourth section, it will be argued that an SP’s is less injurious to the IJI than attributing to each of the judges a non-revisable competence to establish how the law should be interpreted and applied. In the conclusions, it is pointed out that although there may be reasons against having a precedent system, the IJI is not one of them.","PeriodicalId":41953,"journal":{"name":"Derecho PUCP","volume":"1 1","pages":"303-336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45661028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Derecho PUCPPub Date : 2020-05-29DOI: 10.18800/derechopucp.202001.008
Adrián Lengua Parra, Victor Emilio Ostolaza Seminario
{"title":"Enemistad aparente: la tensión entre el concepto de graves violaciones de derechos humanos de la Corte Interamericana con el derecho pena","authors":"Adrián Lengua Parra, Victor Emilio Ostolaza Seminario","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.202001.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.008","url":null,"abstract":"From the judgment of the Barrios Altos case vs. Peru, the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights began to develop the concept of «serious violations of rights» and their consequences in the national criminal sphere. Despite being a consolidated standard, nowadays there are still doubts about what acts should be classified under such legal category and if it is correct to limit certain procedural and criminal guarantees in order to achieve their criminalization. This paper explains these controversies in order to propose a legal solution that avoids impunity and ensures the legitimacy of the legal system.","PeriodicalId":41953,"journal":{"name":"Derecho PUCP","volume":"1 1","pages":"224-269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45863637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Derecho PUCPPub Date : 2020-05-29DOI: 10.18800/derechopucp.202001.002
Víctor Daniel Cabezas Albán
{"title":"El caso de los buzos miskitos: un laboratorio vivo para auditar la adaptabilidad del Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos","authors":"Víctor Daniel Cabezas Albán","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.202001.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.002","url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the level of adaptability of the Inter-American Human Rights System towards different issues, such as the human rights of legal entities and the international responsibility of legal persons for human rights violations. This analysis is made through the lecture and narration of the case Opario Lemoth Morris y otros vs. Honduras, which has been recently summited before the Inter-American Human Rights Court.","PeriodicalId":41953,"journal":{"name":"Derecho PUCP","volume":"1 1","pages":"47-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43356430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Derecho PUCPPub Date : 2020-05-29DOI: 10.18800/derechopucp.202001.003
Piero Ríos Carrillo
{"title":"¿Existe un lugar para el arbitraje dentro del sistema de reparaciones practicado por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos?","authors":"Piero Ríos Carrillo","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.202001.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.003","url":null,"abstract":"This work addresses the role which arbitration could occupy within the reparations system developed by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights when solving contentious disputes. In that sense, the only two precedents in which the Court entertained the possibility of considering arbitration as an alternative means for the determination of reparations shall be described: Garrido and Baigorria vs. Argentina and Chaparro Alvarez and Lapo Iniguez vs. Ecuador. From the analysis of these two precedents, the author will try to: a) Identify and characterize the different approaches taken by the Court in each case; b) evaluate whether these two approaches are consistent with the relevant international human rights law and the general principles of arbitration; c) point out how and when arbitration can be used as an alternative mechanism to determine the reparations in a case concerning human rights violations.human rights violations.","PeriodicalId":41953,"journal":{"name":"Derecho PUCP","volume":"1 1","pages":"69-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46250141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}