IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
Pablo Marshall, Y. Zúñiga
{"title":"Objeción de conciencia y aborto en Chile","authors":"Pablo Marshall, Y. Zúñiga","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.202001.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper critically analyzes conscientious objection in the context of the new regulation of pregnancy termination in Chile. It affirms that adequate regulation should not be blind to the hostile context in which abortion rights have been enacted and the difficulties experienced. The bioethical requirements that seek to balance the interests involved must consider the legal regulation of the interests at stake, the context in which they are implemented and, fundamentally, the effectiveness of the solutions adopted. Attention should be paid to the risks involved in the proliferation of objections that are not serious and to the political use of conscientious objection to prevent the implementation of women’s reproductive rights. In describing the process of entrenchment, strengthening and expansion of the conscientious objection in Chile, we show how this process has overprotected consciousness and the risks of undermining the effectiveness of the new abortion law, hindering and dilating the enjoyment of rights entrenched by the law. In response, regulatory measures are proposed to reverse this situation, which are obtained mainly from the bioethical literature on the subject and that look at the adverse context of the guarantee of women’s sexual and reproductive rights.","PeriodicalId":41953,"journal":{"name":"Derecho PUCP","volume":"1 1","pages":"99-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Derecho PUCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文批判性地分析了良心反对在智利终止妊娠的新规定的背景下。委员会申明,不应无视制定堕胎权利时所处的敌对环境和所经历的困难。寻求平衡所涉及的利益的生物伦理要求必须考虑利害攸关的利益的法律规定,它们实施的背景,以及从根本上说,所采用的解决方案的有效性。应当注意不严重的反对意见泛滥所涉及的危险,以及政治上利用出于良心的反对意见来阻止妇女生殖权利的实施。在描述智利良心反对的巩固、加强和扩大的过程时,我们展示了这一过程是如何过度保护意识的,以及破坏新堕胎法有效性的风险,阻碍和扩大了对法律所确立的权利的享受。作为回应,建议采取管制措施来扭转这种情况,这些措施主要是从关于这一主题的生物伦理文献中获得的,这些文献着眼于保障妇女的性权利和生殖权利的不利背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Objeción de conciencia y aborto en Chile
This paper critically analyzes conscientious objection in the context of the new regulation of pregnancy termination in Chile. It affirms that adequate regulation should not be blind to the hostile context in which abortion rights have been enacted and the difficulties experienced. The bioethical requirements that seek to balance the interests involved must consider the legal regulation of the interests at stake, the context in which they are implemented and, fundamentally, the effectiveness of the solutions adopted. Attention should be paid to the risks involved in the proliferation of objections that are not serious and to the political use of conscientious objection to prevent the implementation of women’s reproductive rights. In describing the process of entrenchment, strengthening and expansion of the conscientious objection in Chile, we show how this process has overprotected consciousness and the risks of undermining the effectiveness of the new abortion law, hindering and dilating the enjoyment of rights entrenched by the law. In response, regulatory measures are proposed to reverse this situation, which are obtained mainly from the bioethical literature on the subject and that look at the adverse context of the guarantee of women’s sexual and reproductive rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信