发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

中国法学前沿最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
DATA REGULATION IN THE INTERNET OF THINGS 物联网中的数据监管
IF 0.3 4区 社会学
中国法学前沿 Pub Date : 2018-10-09 DOI: 10.3868/S050-007-018-0028-9
C. Krönke
{"title":"DATA REGULATION IN THE INTERNET OF THINGS","authors":"C. Krönke","doi":"10.3868/S050-007-018-0028-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3868/S050-007-018-0028-9","url":null,"abstract":"The reflections on data regulation in the internet of things (IoT) in this paper provide an overview of the different conceptions and legal problems of \"data property rights.\" Beginning with an overview of the existing and possible applications of the future IoT (in particular, smart cars), this paper describes the legal concerns that may arise because of increased commercialization of object-generated data. The author uses German and European Union law to illustrate the legal complexities, solutions, and shortcomings. He demonstrates how and to what extent these issues are covered by traditional data protection regulations and highlights the conceptual blind spots of these regulations. He then contrasts the data protection paradigm (de lege lata) with the idea of a general erga omnes data property right (de lege ferenda) and describes the most common understanding of such a right, that is, a data producers' property right. Against the background of the possible economic advantages of general data property rights, the paper discusses conceptual problems and constitutional concerns. In conclusion, the author rejects the idea of a general data property right.","PeriodicalId":41655,"journal":{"name":"中国法学前沿","volume":"13 1","pages":"367-379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42036033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION: RETHINKING THE REASONS, NATURE, AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK 个人数据保护：原因、性质和法律框架的反思
IF 0.3 4区 社会学
中国法学前沿 Pub Date : 2018-10-09 DOI: 10.3868/S050-007-018-0029-6
Xiaodong Ding
{"title":"PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION: RETHINKING THE REASONS, NATURE, AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK","authors":"Xiaodong Ding","doi":"10.3868/S050-007-018-0029-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3868/S050-007-018-0029-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41655,"journal":{"name":"中国法学前沿","volume":"13 1","pages":"380-389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47670002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
DIGITAL BORDER CONTROLS 数字边界控制
IF 0.3 4区 社会学
中国法学前沿 Pub Date : 2018-10-09 DOI: 10.3868/s050-007-018-0032-4
Walther Michl
{"title":"DIGITAL BORDER CONTROLS","authors":"Walther Michl","doi":"10.3868/s050-007-018-0032-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3868/s050-007-018-0032-4","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines to what extent territory plays a role in internet regulation, especially whether an equivalent to physical border controls for cyberspace already exists in Germany, i.e. digital border controls. To that end, both the abstract relevance of the territorial principle and specific examples of legal commands that cause the free flow of data to be interrupted or modified along state boundaries are scrutinized.","PeriodicalId":41655,"journal":{"name":"中国法学前沿","volume":"13 1","pages":"428-440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46191487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
BOUNDARY OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS — A LESSON FROM THE QVOD CASE 论网络服务提供者的刑事责任边界&从QVOD案看
IF 0.3 4区 社会学
中国法学前沿 Pub Date : 2018-10-09 DOI: 10.3868/S050-007-018-0027-2
Chen Xuan
{"title":"BOUNDARY OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS — A LESSON FROM THE QVOD CASE","authors":"Chen Xuan","doi":"10.3868/S050-007-018-0027-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3868/S050-007-018-0027-2","url":null,"abstract":"The Qvod case in 2016, in which the Chinese video-sharing site Qvod was convicted of the crime of disseminating pornographic materials for profits, provoked heated debates regarding the criminal responsibility of internet service providers (ISPs) in China. Using the Qvod case as an example, this paper first discusses the definition and the legal obligations of ISPs, and argues that we should decide the criminal responsibility of ISPs according to their functions and the content of their services. This paper further analyzes four major issues associated with the criminal responsibility of ISPs, including accomplice responsibility, accessory with neutral conduct, perpetrator by action or omission and ideal concurrence (Idealkonkurrenz).","PeriodicalId":41655,"journal":{"name":"中国法学前沿","volume":"13 1","pages":"357-366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49341888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ADJUDICATING THE REGULATORY PENALTIES AGAINST NONPROFESSIONAL TAXI SERVICES IN CHINA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION 裁定中国和欧盟对非专业出租车服务的监管处罚
IF 0.3 4区 社会学
中国法学前沿 Pub Date : 2018-10-09 DOI: 10.3868/S050-007-018-0030-0
Xiong Bing-wan
{"title":"ADJUDICATING THE REGULATORY PENALTIES AGAINST NONPROFESSIONAL TAXI SERVICES IN CHINA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION","authors":"Xiong Bing-wan","doi":"10.3868/S050-007-018-0030-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3868/S050-007-018-0030-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41655,"journal":{"name":"中国法学前沿","volume":"13 1","pages":"390-411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47916150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN THE DIGITAL ERA, HORIZONTAL EFFECT AND THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN “STATE” AND “SOCIETY” IN GERMAN AND EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY 数字时代的基本权利、横向效应与德国与欧洲宪政理论中的“国家”与“社会”之分
IF 0.3 4区 社会学
中国法学前沿 Pub Date : 2018-10-09 DOI: 10.3868/S050-007-018-0033-1
Daniela Wolff
{"title":"FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN THE DIGITAL ERA, HORIZONTAL EFFECT AND THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN “STATE” AND “SOCIETY” IN GERMAN AND EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY","authors":"Daniela Wolff","doi":"10.3868/S050-007-018-0033-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3868/S050-007-018-0033-1","url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the proposal for a \"Charter of Digital Fundamental Rights of the European Union,\" whose central element is a binding effect of its fundamental rights not only to state authorities, but also to powerful private internet companies, which have a potential similar to that of the state to infringe on fundamental rights in the digital era. The article outlines the traditional German approach to fundamental rights and its underlying distinction between state and society, which makes it difficult for German scholars to handle a so-called horizontal effect of fundamental rights. Finally, the article discusses the main objections to such a horizontal effect and shows some practical problems it has the potential to cause in German and European constitutional law.","PeriodicalId":41655,"journal":{"name":"中国法学前沿","volume":"13 1","pages":"441-455"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46695412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENT WITH FOREIGN ELEMENTS IN CHINA: SHANDONG JUFENG V. SOUTH KOREA MGAME 涉外法院协议在中国的选择&山东巨丰诉韩国MGAME案
IF 0.3 4区 社会学
中国法学前沿 Pub Date : 2018-07-20 DOI: 10.3868/s050-007-018-0016-8
Du Huan-fang
{"title":"CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENT WITH FOREIGN ELEMENTS IN CHINA: SHANDONG JUFENG V. SOUTH KOREA MGAME","authors":"Du Huan-fang","doi":"10.3868/s050-007-018-0016-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3868/s050-007-018-0016-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41655,"journal":{"name":"中国法学前沿","volume":"13 1","pages":"241-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43715534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
THE KOLMAR V. SUTEX CASE ON RECIPROCITY IN FOREIGN JUDGMENTS ENFORCEMENT IN CHINA: A WELCOME DEVELOPMENT OR STILL ON THE WRONG TRACK? 科尔马诉苏特克斯案:外国判决在中国执行中的互惠:是可喜的发展还是仍在错误的轨道上?
IF 0.3 4区 社会学
中国法学前沿 Pub Date : 2018-07-20 DOI: 10.3868/S050-007-018-0014-4
Zhu Lei
{"title":"THE KOLMAR V. SUTEX CASE ON RECIPROCITY IN FOREIGN JUDGMENTS ENFORCEMENT IN CHINA: A WELCOME DEVELOPMENT OR STILL ON THE WRONG TRACK?","authors":"Zhu Lei","doi":"10.3868/S050-007-018-0014-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3868/S050-007-018-0014-4","url":null,"abstract":"In December 2016, the Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court in China issued its ruling in the Kolmar v. Sutex case, where a monetary judgment from Singapore was recognized and enforced against a local textile company. The case confirms that once a foreign country has taken the initiative, Chinese courts will follow up to enforce judgments from that country reciprocally. This is the doctrine of de facto reciprocity adopted by some Chinese courts. The paper surveys the judicial practice of Chinese courts and finds that this area of law is full of confusion and uncertainties due to the lack of applicable rules. Recent developments suggest that China may move away from this approach and adopt a relaxed version of reciprocity, which is worthy of close attention.","PeriodicalId":41655,"journal":{"name":"中国法学前沿","volume":"13 1","pages":"202-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48698799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN NON-MONETARY JUDGMENTS IN CHINA 外国非货币判决在中国的承认与执行
IF 0.3 4区 社会学
中国法学前沿 Pub Date : 2018-07-20 DOI: 10.3868/S050-007-018-0015-1
Z. Wenliang
{"title":"RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN NON-MONETARY JUDGMENTS IN CHINA","authors":"Z. Wenliang","doi":"10.3868/S050-007-018-0015-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3868/S050-007-018-0015-1","url":null,"abstract":"Transboundary recognition and enforcement of judgments is of increasing practical significance and it draws a great deal of efforts at various levels. However, the efforts already made are predominantly in relation to cross-border movement of monetary judgments, leaving non-monetary judgments beyond recognizability. Investigation into China’s legislation and adjudication reveals that there is no distinction made between recognition of monetary and non-monetary judgments, and practice also ignores such a distinction. Following the trend of embracing non-monetary judgments within the scope of recognizablility, China’s standpoint seemingly appears to be desirable, although the long-standing non-differentiation of monetary and non-monetary judgments is not presumed to be originally out of promoting recognition and enforcement of foreign non-monetary judgments in China. It is submitted that for promoting recognition and enforcement of foreign non-monetary judgments, China shall introduce independent rules in order to facilitate the circulation of such judgments, which merits a special treatment. For parties to seek the recognition and enforcement of such judgments, prior to any overhauling of the current legal regime, they have to follow China’s persisting general legal regime and judicial practice regarding recognition and enforcement of all categories of foreign judgments, and a special call is made for particular attention to the reciprocity requirement and due service requirement.","PeriodicalId":41655,"journal":{"name":"中国法学前沿","volume":"13 1","pages":"218-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43545655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
WELLS, HEINONLINE AND FRONTIERS OF LAW IN CHINA JOINTLY HOLD A PAPER COMPETITION 威尔斯、海涅在线、中国法律前沿联合举办论文大赛
IF 0.3 4区 社会学
中国法学前沿 Pub Date : 2018-07-20 DOI: 10.3868/s050-007-018-0019-9
Li Ting
{"title":"WELLS, HEINONLINE AND FRONTIERS OF LAW IN CHINA JOINTLY HOLD A PAPER COMPETITION","authors":"Li Ting","doi":"10.3868/s050-007-018-0019-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3868/s050-007-018-0019-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41655,"journal":{"name":"中国法学前沿","volume":"13 1","pages":"309-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44335922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信