BOUNDARY OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS — A LESSON FROM THE QVOD CASE

IF 0.1 4区社会学 Q4 LAW

中国法学前沿 Pub Date : 2018-10-09 DOI:10.3868/S050-007-018-0027-2

Chen Xuan

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Qvod case in 2016, in which the Chinese video-sharing site Qvod was convicted of the crime of disseminating pornographic materials for profits, provoked heated debates regarding the criminal responsibility of internet service providers (ISPs) in China. Using the Qvod case as an example, this paper first discusses the definition and the legal obligations of ISPs, and argues that we should decide the criminal responsibility of ISPs according to their functions and the content of their services. This paper further analyzes four major issues associated with the criminal responsibility of ISPs, including accomplice responsibility, accessory with neutral conduct, perpetrator by action or omission and ideal concurrence (Idealkonkurrenz).

查看原文本刊更多论文

论网络服务提供者的刑事责任边界&从QVOD案看

2016年，中国视频共享网站Qvod被判传播淫秽物品牟利罪，这一案件引发了关于中国互联网服务提供商刑事责任的激烈争论。本文以Qvod案为例，首先讨论了互联网服务提供商的定义和法律义务，并认为应根据其功能和服务内容来确定其刑事责任。本文进一步分析了与互联网服务提供商刑事责任相关的四个主要问题，包括共犯责任、中立行为从犯、作为或不作为行为人和理想竞合（Idealkonkurrenz）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

中国法学前沿 LAW-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

398

期刊介绍： Frontiers of Law in China seeks to provide a forum for a broad blend of peer-reviewed academic papers of law studies, in order to promote communication and cooperation between jurists in China and abroad. It will reflect the substantial advances that are currently being made in Chinese universities in the field of law. Its coverage includes all main branches of law, such as jurisprudence, constitutional jurisprudence, science of civil and commercial law, science of economic law, science of environmental law, science of intellectual property, science of criminal justice, science of procedural law, science of administrative law, science of international law, science of legal history, science of history of legal thoughts, etc.