{"title":"Kratka razprava o teorijah zarote","authors":"Alenka Zupančič","doi":"10.3986/FV.41.3.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3986/FV.41.3.08","url":null,"abstract":"Teorije zarote so zanimiv fenomen, ki ga ne moremo odpraviti s posmehljivim zamahom roke. V zadnjem času še toliko manj, saj tudi nekatere najbolj bizarne med njimi masovno vstopajo v javni prostor, v mainstream, celo v uradno politiko. Najbolj eklatanten primer je tu verjetno navezava QAnona na osebo in politiko Donalda Trumpa. Prispevek najprej analizira nekatere razloge za preboj teorij zarot v mainstream, nato pa se posveti raziskovanju in opredelitvi treh ključnih aspektov teorije zarot: kategoriji velikega Drugega kot velikega Manipulanta, strasti do interpretacije in notranji povezavi med ustvarjanjem smisla in užitkom.","PeriodicalId":41584,"journal":{"name":"FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45471387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Espace et nombre : deux voies dans l’ontologie ?","authors":"D. Rabouin","doi":"10.3986/FV.41.2.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3986/FV.41.2.10","url":null,"abstract":"Cet article poursuit un dialogue engagé à la sortie de Logiques des mondes à partir de trois grandes lignes de questionnement : 1. La première, la plus immédiate, est le sens qu’il convient de donner au célèbre slogan « mathématiques = ontologie ». C’est autre chose, en effet, d’avancer que les « mathématiques sont l’ontologie », comme l’avait promu l’Être et l’événement explicitement1, et de dire que la théorie des ensembles seule est l’ontologie (comme l’avance Logiques des mondes, ainsi que d’autres textes contemporains). Il semble qu’il y ait en ce point une inflexion importante du système, au demeurant non thématisée comme telle ; la théorie des ensemble est-elle une manière d’exprimer l’ontologie, c’est-à-dire les mathématiques, ou est-elle l’ontologie elle-même ? 2. Ceci conduit à une interrogation plus large sur le rapport, en mathématiques, entre expression et ontologie, ou « langage » et « être ». Ici, je voudrais indiquer que, contrairement à ce que l’on pourrait croire, il y a souvent une ambiguïté entre l’un et l’autre non seulement chez Badiou, mais plus généralement dans les discussions de philosophie des mathématiques. Si cette distinction est pertinente — et j’essayerai de montrer pourquoi elle doit l’être —, alors on ne peut pas conclure trop vite du fait que les mathématiques ont adopté une expression unifiée grâce au langage ensembliste au fait que la forme de l’être qu’elles expriment est de nature ensembliste (que l’être est « multiple pur » dans le vocabulaire de Badiou) ; 3. Enfin, je voudrais creuser le fait que le langage ensembliste a justement donné lieu à la thématisation de deux orientations que l’on pourrait tout aussi bien qualifier d’« ontologiques » (dans un sens différent, donc, de celui que lui donne Badiou) ; la première met en avant le nombre, tandis que l’autre met en avant l’espace (plus tard nommé « topologique »). Que l’on dispose d’un langage apte à les décrire de manière homogène ne préjuge pas alors de ce que nous ayons affaire à un seul domaine d’objets. Je voudrais montrer","PeriodicalId":41584,"journal":{"name":"FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41366268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Truth between Semblance and the Real","authors":"J. Riha","doi":"10.3986/FV.41.1.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3986/FV.41.1.12","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41584,"journal":{"name":"FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46766393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Lacan’s Fifth and Unfinished Discourse: Capitalism’s Alchemist Dream","authors":"Cindy Zeiher","doi":"10.3986/FV.41.1.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3986/FV.41.1.13","url":null,"abstract":"Why is it that we sometimes think of Lacan as Marxist when is so assertively Freudian? Perhaps it is because Lacan perceives Marx rather than Freud as the discoverer of the symptom and furthermore places Marx as central to his fifth Capitalist discourse, in contrast with his previous discourses which are all inspired by Freud. In this way Lacan’s final and arguably unfinished Capitalist discourse stands apart from all the others, yet at the same time it reveals contradictions and possible parallels with them as it attempts to unravel the dialectical tensions between the problematic production and consumption of meaning.","PeriodicalId":41584,"journal":{"name":"FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48529526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Truth between Semblance and the Real","authors":"Jelica Šumič Riha","doi":"10.3986/fv.41.1.12.","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3986/fv.41.1.12.","url":null,"abstract":"What is the peculiar evocative force of the notion of the real? Rather than succumbing to the temptation of forcing appearance in order to accede to the real supposed to be lurking behind it, for Lacanian psychoanalysis the access to the real is that of the semblance. While one of our aims in this paper is to briefly outline the development of Lacan’s rather peculiar “realism”, we would also wish to emphasize the relation between the real and the semblance as being the crux of Lacan’s later teaching. Indeed, for psychoanalysis, the question of the real is inseparable from the interrogation of the semblance, a term forged by Lacan in the last period of his teaching in order to rework the relation between the truth and the real. This is why although the semblance is relevant to numerous contemporary discourses, it is only in psychoanalysis that this problem is raised to the level of one of the central theoretical and practical issues. Omnipresent, unsettling, yet unresolved, this problem comes to the fore at the critical moments in the history of psychoanalysis, thereby marking turning points at which the orientation of psychoanalysis is at stake.","PeriodicalId":41584,"journal":{"name":"FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49238871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Althusser, Machiavelli, and the PCF","authors":"V. Morfino","doi":"10.3986/FV.41.1.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3986/FV.41.1.03","url":null,"abstract":"In this essay I consider the fundamental features of Althusser’s reading of Machiavelli in its historical development, starting from the 1962 lecture course, passing through the 1972–76 course published with the title of Machiavel et nous as well as the writings of 1977–78, concluding with the group of writings written during the 1980s. I show that any teleological reading that sees in the final writings the truth finally revealed of the path of Althusser’s reading of Machiavelli (or its inversion, that is, the path itself as a corruption of an original truth) should be rejected, and instead present the thesis that Althusser, through the figure of Machiavelli, theoretically reworks his relationship with the Party.","PeriodicalId":41584,"journal":{"name":"FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42038695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Objektivnost v krizi","authors":"Tadej Troha","doi":"10.3986/FV.41.3.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3986/FV.41.3.06","url":null,"abstract":"Članek obravnava ponavljajoči se diskurzivni mehanizem, prek katerega se sodobne družbe odzivajo na pojavitev krize. Ko so soočene s presežkom objektivnosti, ki ga proizvede kriza – naj gre za globalno ekonomsko, begunsko, podnebno ali pandemsko –, se v diskurzu tvori dvokomponentni obrambni mehanizem, ki naposled tudi sam prevzame psevdo-objektivni status. V prvem koraku – potem ko je bila ovržen poskus neposredne negacije vznika krize – je kriza afirmirana s kompromisno konstatacijo njenega obstoja, ki izpostavi domnevno centralni uvid, ki ga je prinesla kriza; v drugem koraku je konstatacija dopolnjena s psevdo-objektivnim praktičnim pravilom. V primeru trenutne pandemije, ki je podrobno obravnavana v tretjem segmentu prispevka, je bilo praktično pravilo oblikovano kot politična generalizacija načela sorazmernosti. Ker slednje ni aplikabilno na osnovne dinamične principe pandemije in posledično ne more razrešiti krize, je bilo postopoma reducirano na minimum: moramo se naučiti živeti z virusom.","PeriodicalId":41584,"journal":{"name":"FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70403570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Bolzano’s Badiou","authors":"Nick Nesbitt","doi":"10.3986/FV.41.2.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3986/FV.41.2.03","url":null,"abstract":"This article raises a series of points of confluence between Badiou’s philosophy and that of Bernard Bolzano, whom Badiou has identified as a historical predecessor but never directly engaged. These points include their respective critiques of Kant and Hegel, as well as their various concepts of sets, platonist realism, axiomatisation, the infinite, adequate demonstration, structure, and mathematics as the adequate language of being.","PeriodicalId":41584,"journal":{"name":"FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45795807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"To the End: Exposing the Absolute","authors":"Frank Ruda","doi":"10.3986/FV.41.2.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3986/FV.41.2.12","url":null,"abstract":"This article reconstructs Badiou’s oeuvre from the vantage point of the last volume of his Being and Event trilogy. It determines the perspective and task of The Immanence of Truths and demonstrates in what way an “absolute ontology” is the result of an act of forcing that serves as the measure for a truth’s truthness. This allows to argue that Badiou’s is and always was a philosophy of freedom.","PeriodicalId":41584,"journal":{"name":"FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46895650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Badiou and the Ontological Limits of Mathematics","authors":"M. Hauser","doi":"10.3986/FV.41.2.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3986/FV.41.2.05","url":null,"abstract":"In the history of philosophy we can find various ways of philosophy relating to mathematics (Eleats, the Atomists, Plato, Descartes, Leibniz, etc.). In keeping with this tradition, Badiou constituted a new relationship between philosophy and mathematics. In Badiou’s words, “mathematics can tell us something about being as such, without knowing that this is the very meaning of mathematics.”2 This relationship formed a new position of philosophy regarding mathematics, which I will gradually elucidate.","PeriodicalId":41584,"journal":{"name":"FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41974259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
