Justice Evaluation Journal最新文献_第8页

Differences in Justice, Differences in Outcomes: A DID Approach to Studying Outcomes in Juvenile and Adult Court Processing 司法差异，结果差异:用DID方法研究青少年和成人法庭处理的结果

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2019.1585927

Kendall Robinson, Megan C. Kurlychek

{"title":"Differences in Justice, Differences in Outcomes: A DID Approach to Studying Outcomes in Juvenile and Adult Court Processing","authors":"Kendall Robinson, Megan C. Kurlychek","doi":"10.1080/24751979.2019.1585927","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2019.1585927","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract For almost half a century, there has been an ongoing philosophical debate regarding the appropriateness of processing youth in adult courts. Since the juvenile system was theoretically designed to rehabilitate and the adult system to punish, one could assume that there should be key differences in both experiences and outcomes across systems. Yet empirical findings remain mixed. However, almost all existing studies are plagued by issues of selection bias and examine only sentencing or recidivism outcomes. This study overcomes these limitations by addressing both sentencing and recidivism as well as capitalizing on a legislative policy change that increased the age of criminal responsibility for all youth in Connecticut. Using a difference in difference modeling strategy, we find that the system of processing matters somewhat for sentencing outcomes with youth in the juvenile system being more likely to receive probation. However, youth processed in the juvenile court also recidivated at a slightly higher rate, which is contrary to expectation. We explore several possible meanings for these findings and end with a call for future research to include qualitative analysis of actual youth experience—regardless of the system of processing—as more probable indicators of later life outcomes.","PeriodicalId":41318,"journal":{"name":"Justice Evaluation Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"35 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89766989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Creating Systems That Can Improve Safety and Justice (and Why Piecemeal Change Won’t Work) 创建可以改善安全和正义的系统(以及为什么零敲碎打的改变行不通)

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2019.1569475

D. Mears

引用次数: 5

Nothing Fake Here: The Public Criminology Case for Being Smart on Crime by Being Smarter on People 这里没有什么是假的:公共犯罪学案例通过更聪明地对待人来聪明地对待犯罪

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2019.1597636

A. Piquero

引用次数: 10

Lessons Learned Implementing Gunshot Detection Technology: Results of a Process Evaluation in Three Major Cities 实施枪炮探测技术的经验教训:三个主要城市的过程评估结果

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2018-10-26 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2018.1548254

Daniel S. Lawrence, Nancy G. La Vigne, Margaret Goff, Paige S. Thompson

引用次数: 12

Advancing “What Works” in Justice: Past, Present, and Future Work of Federal Justice Research Agencies 推进司法“有效”:联邦司法研究机构的过去、现在和未来工作

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2018-10-26 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2018.1552083

T. Feucht, J. Tyson

{"title":"Advancing “What Works” in Justice: Past, Present, and Future Work of Federal Justice Research Agencies","authors":"T. Feucht, J. Tyson","doi":"10.1080/24751979.2018.1552083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2018.1552083","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since the 1960s, research on crime, delinquency, and justice has achieved important milestones regarding program evaluation. The field has made significant strides in identifying and cataloging evidence-based programs, practices, and policies for juvenile and criminal justice. These efforts have helped refine our definition of “evidence-based programs.” Tracing the distinctive role that Federal science agencies have played in determining what works and in advancing evidence-based approaches to crime and justice, we highlight key milestones, distinctive features, and the changing landscape of justice research over the past half-century. We extend our examination of current efforts to discern future directions for evaluation and evidence work in our field. Our review of a half-century of justice evaluation to build evidence-based approaches in juvenile and criminal justice reveals an evolution in our field’s commitment to rigor, our standards of evidence, and our notions of “what works.” Our review suggests important directions for the future including the importance of program context, the trade-offs between implementation fidelity and experimentation, and the added value of supporting programs with decision-making tools and platforms. We close with some insights into how current approaches to evaluation may further evolve and grow, especially in the areas of implementation, program adaptation, and support for local capacity. The payoff is a deeper understanding of the potential and the limitations of evaluation evidence to determine what works and what doesn’t.","PeriodicalId":41318,"journal":{"name":"Justice Evaluation Journal","volume":"120 1","pages":"151 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2018-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77435285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

The Neglected “R” in the Risk-Needs-Responsivity Model: A New Approach for Assessing Responsivity to Correctional Interventions 风险-需求-反应模型中被忽视的“R”:一种评估矫正干预反应性的新方法

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2018-10-26 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2018.1502622

G. Duwe, KiDeuk Kim

引用次数: 5

Evidence-Based or Just Promising? Lessons Learned in Taking Inventory of State Correctional Programming 基于证据还是仅仅有希望?盘点国家惩教计划的经验教训

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2018-10-26 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2018.1528849

Christopher M. Campbell, Mia J. Abboud, Z. Hamilton, Jacqueline vanWormer, Brianne M. Posey

引用次数: 9

Absenteeism Interventions: An Approach for Common Definitions in Statewide Program Evaluations 缺勤干预:在全州范围内的项目评估的共同定义的方法

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2018-09-28 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2018.1517584

Anne Hobbs, Marijana M. Kotlaja, Lindsey E. Wylie

{"title":"Absenteeism Interventions: An Approach for Common Definitions in Statewide Program Evaluations","authors":"Anne Hobbs, Marijana M. Kotlaja, Lindsey E. Wylie","doi":"10.1080/24751979.2018.1517584","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2018.1517584","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Chronic absenteeism is related to poor academic performance, delinquency, and other high-risk behaviors. Although research has found some promising interventions to reduce absenteeism, the literature lacks clarity on operationalizing absenteeism and when programs should intervene with youth who have varying absenteeism patterns. Using the Response to Intervention (RtI) framework to classify youth into tiers based on their degree of absenteeism, the present study evaluated 12 absenteeism programs, across 137 schools, with a sample of 1,606 youth as part of a statewide evaluation in which programs provided attendance data using a common measurement system. The findings indicated that youth with the highest rates of absenteeism (Tier 3) showed significant improvement in attendance during intervention, whereas youth with fewer absences (Tiers 1A, 1B, and 2) did not significantly improve attendance. Using a mixed repeated measures analysis to compare attendance prior to the program to attendance while in the program, results revealed that tier classification and school explained change in attendance for both excused and unexcused absences. Using common measurement for absenteeism and tier classifications is a useful framework for comparing attendance patterns and program success across programs within different schools, school districts, and states whose measurement of attendance may vary.","PeriodicalId":41318,"journal":{"name":"Justice Evaluation Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"215 - 232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2018-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85005567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

Rethinking Police Evaluation Research: Balancing “Zen” with the “Art of Motorcycle Maintenance”* 警察评价研究的再思考:平衡“禅”与“摩托车维修艺术”*

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2018-05-24 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2018.1478442

Jack R. Greene

引用次数: 1

Impact of the MeckFUSE Pilot Project: Recidivism Among the Chronically Homeless MeckFUSE试点项目的影响:长期无家可归者的再犯

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2018-05-24 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2018.1478236

S. J. Listwan, Jennifer L. Hartman, Ashleigh LaCourse

引用次数: 8