创建可以改善安全和正义的系统(以及为什么零敲碎打的改变行不通)

IF 1.3 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
D. Mears
{"title":"创建可以改善安全和正义的系统(以及为什么零敲碎打的改变行不通)","authors":"D. Mears","doi":"10.1080/24751979.2019.1569475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Criminal justice cannot be highly effective or cost-efficient because of its fragmented design and the lack of research on systems operations and impacts. Substantial improvement to public safety and justice requires a systems approach that involves multiple stakeholder groups. This approach includes creation of an agency responsible for oversight, monitoring, and evaluation of criminal justice. It also includes reliance on systems analysis and evaluation research. The latter constitutes the easier task; the former requires political will and economic investment.","PeriodicalId":41318,"journal":{"name":"Justice Evaluation Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating Systems That Can Improve Safety and Justice (and Why Piecemeal Change Won’t Work)\",\"authors\":\"D. Mears\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24751979.2019.1569475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Criminal justice cannot be highly effective or cost-efficient because of its fragmented design and the lack of research on systems operations and impacts. Substantial improvement to public safety and justice requires a systems approach that involves multiple stakeholder groups. This approach includes creation of an agency responsible for oversight, monitoring, and evaluation of criminal justice. It also includes reliance on systems analysis and evaluation research. The latter constitutes the easier task; the former requires political will and economic investment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Justice Evaluation Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Justice Evaluation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2019.1569475\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justice Evaluation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2019.1569475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要刑事司法由于其支离破碎的设计和缺乏对系统运行和影响的研究,无法实现高效或成本效益。公共安全和司法的实质性改善需要一个涉及多个利益攸关方群体的系统方法。这一办法包括设立一个负责监督、监测和评价刑事司法的机构。它还包括对系统分析和评估研究的依赖。后者是比较容易的任务;前者需要政治意愿和经济投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Creating Systems That Can Improve Safety and Justice (and Why Piecemeal Change Won’t Work)
Abstract Criminal justice cannot be highly effective or cost-efficient because of its fragmented design and the lack of research on systems operations and impacts. Substantial improvement to public safety and justice requires a systems approach that involves multiple stakeholder groups. This approach includes creation of an agency responsible for oversight, monitoring, and evaluation of criminal justice. It also includes reliance on systems analysis and evaluation research. The latter constitutes the easier task; the former requires political will and economic investment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Justice Evaluation Journal
Justice Evaluation Journal CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信