Justice Evaluation Journal最新文献_第7页

Assessing the Efficacy of Alternatives to Incarceration within Seven Federal Districts 评估七个联邦区替代监禁的有效性

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2019.1654354

Kevin T. Wolff, Laura M. Baber, Christine A. Dozier, Roberto Cordeiro

引用次数: 0

The Case for Studying Criminal Nonfatal Shootings: Evidence from Four Midwest Cities 研究刑事非致命枪击案件:来自中西部四个城市的证据

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2019.1689152

N. Hipple, Beth m. Huebner, Theodore S. Lentz, E. McGarrell, Mallory E. O’Brien

引用次数: 22

An Evaluation of Successful Program Completions across Types of Problem-Solving Courts 对各类解决问题法庭成功完成项目的评估

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2019.1679009

K. Kaiser

{"title":"An Evaluation of Successful Program Completions across Types of Problem-Solving Courts","authors":"K. Kaiser","doi":"10.1080/24751979.2019.1679009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2019.1679009","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Variations of problem-solving court programs have been created to address a wide variety of offense-related problems, such as drug addiction, mental health, domestic violence, homelessness, and many others. Yet there is little knowledge as to whether this model is equally effective across these many versions of the model. This study uses data from the 2012 Census of Problem-Solving Courts to assess whether there is variation in the proportion of successful program completions across program types. Additionally, this study examined what program-level characteristics are associated with increased successful program completions. The findings of this study suggest that, while there is some variation in program success across program types, there is also substantial variation within types of programs. That is, not one type of problem-solving court program is more effective than any other. The results of this study also found that the programs that offer a larger variety of services are likely to have higher levels of successful program completions. Future research should follow these preliminary findings by examining variations in other outcomes measures of success.","PeriodicalId":41318,"journal":{"name":"Justice Evaluation Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"54 - 68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87772987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

The Criminogenic Effect of Marijuana Dispensaries in Denver, Colorado: A Microsynthetic Control Quasi-Experiment and Cost-Benefit Analysis 科罗拉多州丹佛市大麻药房的犯罪效应:微合成控制准实验和成本效益分析

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2019-12-04 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2019.1691934

Nathan T. Connealy, Eric L. Piza, D. Hatten

引用次数: 17

Examining the Predictive Validity of the Static-99R on Native American Sex Offenders 静态- 99r对美国原住民性犯罪者预测效度的检验

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2019.1636614

Andrew J. Myer

引用次数: 1

Saturation Policing and Robberies: Quasi-Experimental Evidence about the Effect of Sudden and Quick Operations 饱和警务和抢劫:关于突然和快速行动影响的准实验证据

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2019-06-25 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2019.1629827

Alejandro Cid

引用次数: 3

Reforming Juvenile Detention for Youth with Developmental Disabilities: I.T. v. Los Angeles County 为有发育障碍的青少年改造少管所:I.T.诉洛杉矶县

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2019-06-19 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2019.1625717

Lois Weinberg, D. Herz, Jolan M. Smith, Kristine Chan

引用次数: 0

Intervening in the Lives of Gang Members in Denver: A Pilot Evaluation of the Gang Reduction Initiative of Denver 干预丹佛市帮派成员的生活:丹佛市减少帮派行动的试点评估

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2019-05-07 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2019.1609334

D. Pyrooz, E. Weltman, J. Sánchez

{"title":"Intervening in the Lives of Gang Members in Denver: A Pilot Evaluation of the Gang Reduction Initiative of Denver","authors":"D. Pyrooz, E. Weltman, J. Sánchez","doi":"10.1080/24751979.2019.1609334","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2019.1609334","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There are over one million gang members in the United States, but effective practices and programs to facilitate disengagement from gangs are rare. This first aim of this article was to introduce the intervention strategy of the Gang Reduction Initiative of Denver (GRID), a public agency operating at the core of a network of partners seeking to reduce gang violence in Denver. GRID uses a multidisciplinary team approach with coordinated and individualized case management and street outreach workers to facilitate disengagement from gangs and desistance from crime. The second aim of this article was to report the results of a pilot project evaluation, which entailed baseline interviews with 57 clients and follow-up interviews with 20 clients. Reductions in gang status, gang embeddedness, and offending were observed, as well as positive client–outreach relationships. The final aim was to report the steps toward establishing a foundation to conduct a full-scale evaluation. Most responses to gangs are considered promising because they have not been subject to rigorous evaluation. GRID aims to stand in contrast to most of the current inventory of justice evaluations of gang interventions through a process and impact evaluation consisting of random assignment to treatment and control groups.","PeriodicalId":41318,"journal":{"name":"Justice Evaluation Journal","volume":"69 1","pages":"139 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86136070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Price of Liberty or Never Again: Americans’ Views on Preventing Mass Murder 自由的代价还是永不再来:美国人对防止大屠杀的看法

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2019.1569474

Murat Haner, F. Cullen, Cheryl Lero Jonson, A. L. Burton, T. C. Kulig

{"title":"Price of Liberty or Never Again: Americans’ Views on Preventing Mass Murder","authors":"Murat Haner, F. Cullen, Cheryl Lero Jonson, A. L. Burton, T. C. Kulig","doi":"10.1080/24751979.2019.1569474","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2019.1569474","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Shortly following the mass murders at a concert in Las Vegas, NV and at a church Sutherland Springs, TX, a national sample (n = 1,000) was surveyed in December 2017 regarding gun control policies. The study’s key finding is that two thirds of Americans rejected the view that these incidents were the “price of liberty,” advocating instead for efforts to ensure that such massacres should occur “never again.” A clear majority of the sample also rejected the idea that a gun was needed to repel the federal government’s threat to take away liberty and that a “good person” with a gun is the best way to stop a “bad person” with a gun. By contrast, high support was found for banning lethal firearms and bullets, for banning firearm ownership by risky people, and for most proposals seeking to regulate firearm ownership. Less support for these initiatives was found among males, the less educated, and gun owners as well as among those favoring the NRA, fearing government tyranny, and believing that carrying guns prevents murder. The results suggest that in the current context—which includes repeated mass murders—public opinion is conducive to reforms aimed at implementing common-sense gun safety regulations. The implications of likely policy reforms for justice evaluation are discussed.","PeriodicalId":41318,"journal":{"name":"Justice Evaluation Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"50 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86620228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 24

How to Increase the Relevance and Use of Social and Behavioral Science: Lessons for Policy-makers, Researchers and Others 如何提高社会和行为科学的相关性和使用:给决策者、研究人员和其他人的教训

IF 2.1

Justice Evaluation Journal Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2019.1600381

M. Western

引用次数: 9