{"title":"A Note to PEL Readers","authors":"S. Lewis","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.991227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.991227","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"2 1","pages":"3 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82335086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Index & List of Reporters","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.991232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.991232","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"26 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73631949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judicial Decisions","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.981140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.981140","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “Judicial Decisions” are abstracts of recent federal and state court decisions addressing issues of importance to the land use lawyer and planner, such as zoning, inverse condemnation, growth management, signs and billboards, vested rights, and many more.","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"12 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76054391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Decision to Know: City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Stephen C. Myers","authors":"S. Villavaso","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.981139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.981139","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Stephen Myers was leasing a single‐family residential property in an area zoned A‐1 within the city of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, to four unrelated persons. Per Baton Rouge’s Unified Development Code (UDC) a “family” is defined as “an individual or two (2) or more persons who are related by blood, marriage or legal adoption living together . . . or not more than two (2) persons, or not more than four (4) persons (provided the owner lives on the premises rpar; living together by joint agreement. . . . ” (Myers at 9). In response, the city brought the action seeking to compel Myers to cease his alleged violation of the UDC, and Myers made a reconventional demand alleging the UDC’s definition of family was unconstitutional.","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"60 1","pages":"10 - 11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78132072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Index & List of Reporters","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.981142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.981142","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"359 7-8","pages":"26 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15480755.2014.981142","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72448527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"First Amendment Limits on Government Holiday Displays","authors":"Gregory M. Lipper","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.981138","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.981138","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “No holiday season is complete . . . without one or more First Amendment challenges to public holiday displays.” While Santa, Rudolph, and Frosty typically appear at city hall without controversy, government holiday displays that include religious symbols—such as a Christian creche, a Jewish menorah, or a Muslim star and crescent—are more likely to attract legal scrutiny under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. For governments that sponsor holiday displays with religious symbols, the resulting litigation can be costly. If the court concludes that the challenged display violates the Constitution, the government must pay the plaintiff’s costs and attorney fees. And even longstanding displays can be challenged—mere tradition is not a defense.","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"110 1","pages":"4 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76445455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judicial Decisions","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.960314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.960314","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “Judicial Decisions” are abstracts of recent federal and state court decisions addressing issues of importance to the land use lawyer and planner, such as zoning, inverse condemnation, growth management, signs and billboards, vested rights, and many more.","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"13 1","pages":"12 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83471959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}