第一修正案对政府节日展览的限制

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW
Gregory M. Lipper
{"title":"第一修正案对政府节日展览的限制","authors":"Gregory M. Lipper","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.981138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “No holiday season is complete . . . without one or more First Amendment challenges to public holiday displays.” While Santa, Rudolph, and Frosty typically appear at city hall without controversy, government holiday displays that include religious symbols—such as a Christian creche, a Jewish menorah, or a Muslim star and crescent—are more likely to attract legal scrutiny under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. For governments that sponsor holiday displays with religious symbols, the resulting litigation can be costly. If the court concludes that the challenged display violates the Constitution, the government must pay the plaintiff’s costs and attorney fees. And even longstanding displays can be challenged—mere tradition is not a defense.","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"110 1","pages":"4 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First Amendment Limits on Government Holiday Displays\",\"authors\":\"Gregory M. Lipper\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15480755.2014.981138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract “No holiday season is complete . . . without one or more First Amendment challenges to public holiday displays.” While Santa, Rudolph, and Frosty typically appear at city hall without controversy, government holiday displays that include religious symbols—such as a Christian creche, a Jewish menorah, or a Muslim star and crescent—are more likely to attract legal scrutiny under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. For governments that sponsor holiday displays with religious symbols, the resulting litigation can be costly. If the court concludes that the challenged display violates the Constitution, the government must pay the plaintiff’s costs and attorney fees. And even longstanding displays can be challenged—mere tradition is not a defense.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"4 - 9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.981138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.981138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:“没有一个假期是完整的……没有一个或多个宪法第一修正案对公众假日展示的挑战。”虽然圣诞老人、鲁道夫和Frosty通常出现在市政厅没有争议,但政府节日展示包括宗教符号,如基督教的基督诞生塑像、犹太的烛台或穆斯林的星星和新月,更有可能根据美国宪法第一修正案的建立条款受到法律审查。对于赞助带有宗教符号的节日展览的政府来说,由此引发的诉讼可能代价高昂。如果法院认定受到质疑的展示违反了宪法,政府必须支付原告的诉讼费和律师费。即使是长期的展示也会受到挑战——仅仅是传统并不能作为辩护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First Amendment Limits on Government Holiday Displays
Abstract “No holiday season is complete . . . without one or more First Amendment challenges to public holiday displays.” While Santa, Rudolph, and Frosty typically appear at city hall without controversy, government holiday displays that include religious symbols—such as a Christian creche, a Jewish menorah, or a Muslim star and crescent—are more likely to attract legal scrutiny under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. For governments that sponsor holiday displays with religious symbols, the resulting litigation can be costly. If the court concludes that the challenged display violates the Constitution, the government must pay the plaintiff’s costs and attorney fees. And even longstanding displays can be challenged—mere tradition is not a defense.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信