Decision to Know: City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Stephen C. Myers

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW
S. Villavaso
{"title":"Decision to Know: City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Stephen C. Myers","authors":"S. Villavaso","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.981139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Stephen Myers was leasing a single‐family residential property in an area zoned A‐1 within the city of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, to four unrelated persons. Per Baton Rouge’s Unified Development Code (UDC) a “family” is defined as “an individual or two (2) or more persons who are related by blood, marriage or legal adoption living together . . . or not more than two (2) persons, or not more than four (4) persons (provided the owner lives on the premises rpar; living together by joint agreement. . . . ” (Myers at 9). In response, the city brought the action seeking to compel Myers to cease his alleged violation of the UDC, and Myers made a reconventional demand alleging the UDC’s definition of family was unconstitutional.","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"60 1","pages":"10 - 11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.981139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Stephen Myers was leasing a single‐family residential property in an area zoned A‐1 within the city of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, to four unrelated persons. Per Baton Rouge’s Unified Development Code (UDC) a “family” is defined as “an individual or two (2) or more persons who are related by blood, marriage or legal adoption living together . . . or not more than two (2) persons, or not more than four (4) persons (provided the owner lives on the premises rpar; living together by joint agreement. . . . ” (Myers at 9). In response, the city brought the action seeking to compel Myers to cease his alleged violation of the UDC, and Myers made a reconventional demand alleging the UDC’s definition of family was unconstitutional.
要知道的决定:巴吞鲁日市/东巴吞鲁日教区诉斯蒂芬·迈尔斯案
Stephen Myers在路易斯安那州巴吞鲁日市a‐1区租给了四个不相关的人一套独户住宅。根据巴吞鲁日的统一发展法典(UDC),“家庭”被定义为“通过血缘、婚姻或合法收养生活在一起的个人或两(2)个或更多的人……”或不超过两(2)人,或不超过四(4)人(如果业主住在该处所);通过共同协议住在一起. . . .(Myers at 9)作为回应,市政府采取行动,试图迫使Myers停止他所谓的违反UDC的行为,Myers再次提出要求,称UDC对家庭的定义违宪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信