Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law最新文献

{"title":"The regulatory failure of spatial planning and its environmental impact: a case study of hotel projects in Bali, Indonesia","authors":"I. P. Widiatedja","doi":"10.1108/jppel-10-2021-0048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jppel-10-2021-0048","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000This paper aims to explain the impact of spatial planning regulations in the development of hotels in Bali, particularly as regards environmental damage. It then analyzes the factors that cause spatial planning to fail to prevent environmental damage.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000This paper is based on both fieldwork and library research, and a broadly socio-legal approach is adopted, involving a combination of doctrinal research and empirical legal method.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000This paper finds that interrelated legal, political and economic factors contribute to this failure, including conflicting regulations on the review and amendment of spatial plans, the pursuance of economic enrichment and an unsustainable approach to economic development. Although some or even all of these factors may have seemed obvious from the start, because they are common causes of regulatory failure, this paper demonstrates empirically that they are exacerbated and made more challenging because of the interrelationship between legal, political and economic factors.\u0000\u0000\u0000Research limitations/implications\u0000Given the existence of intertwined legal, political and economic factors behind the regulatory failure of spatial planning, more studies need to be undertaken to restore spatial planning objectives as a means of preventing tourism projects in Bali from damaging the environment.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000The author proposes a reform to make spatial planning regulations more effective, particularly in preventing environmental damage by tourism projects.\u0000","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88706635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"When a backer is an expropriator: pitfalls in the consumer protection mechanism for off-plan building sales in Vietnamese law","authors":"Ha Thi Thanh Doan, Diep Thi Phuong Doan, Sang Minh Luu","doi":"10.1108/jppel-01-2022-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jppel-01-2022-0005","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000To motivate investments in housing projects, the state may allow private entities to mobilize capital through selling off-plan buildings and use proceeds to complete the project. The state senses the risks for consumers in these projects: frauds certainly occur. To safeguard consumers’ interests, the Vietnamese Government requires developers to obtain a bank's refund guarantee to sell off-plan. This paper aims to point out how consumers are marginalized due to the mechanism (mechanisms) dedicated to protecting them.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000The authors review the legal regulations in Vietnam, contracts in transactions on which they have given legal consultation (the authors leave the information anonymous for privacy issues), and real disputes exposed by newspapers re: off-plan sales.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000This paper argues that the measure fails for two reasons. First, there are many weaknesses allowing banks to avoid this mechanism. Second, banks lend to developers, and as such, play the role of a secured creditor. In these situations, there is a conflict of interest between the bank's roles and between the bank and consumers. Moreover, Vietnamese law, by endowing banks the privilege of seizing and obtaining possession of collaterals, may put aside consumers' interests.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000Bank's refund guarantee’ is a recent initiative of the Vietnamese Government, offered to safeguard consumers’ interests in off-plan sales. Issues arising thereupon have not yet been fully exposed, especially, in conjunction with a broad view of the Vietnamese legal system. The analysis and critiques offered by this study may have policy implications for other jurisdictions as well.\u0000","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80776422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Mistakes, mispleading and overreaching: understanding title registration and correcting the register","authors":"M. Dixon","doi":"10.1108/jppel-11-2021-0053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jppel-11-2021-0053","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000The purpose of this paper is to analyse whether title to land is secure in England and Wales when registered under the Land Registration Act (LRA) 2002, in particular when a title is registered, where there has been a mistake and how that connects with the doctrine of overreaching.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000This paper analyses the reported judgements, with particular emphasis on the decision in Knight v Fernley (2021).\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000This paper explores the concepts of “mistake” and “overreaching” and concludes that LRA 2002 provides a complex, but complete answer to concerns about the application of these doctrines.\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000This paper will encourage certainty in the judicial decision-making process when “mistakes” occur in the land register. It will contribute to the resolution of difficult, and current, controversies.\u0000\u0000\u0000Social implications\u0000To enable legal advisers to be clear in their obligations and the advice they give to clients, and to further a better understanding of of title registration in England and Wales.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000The LRA 2002 replaces registration of title with title by registration. The real force of this is only now being realised and there are few reported judgements, and less consistency, working out what this means in practice. There are no other comments on this critical case, even though it helps elucidate the circumstances in which the title register may be altered.\u0000","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77693345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"An evaluation of EIA system performance in Turkey in the context of procedural effectiveness","authors":"Deniz Çolakkadioğlu","doi":"10.1108/jppel-05-2021-0032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jppel-05-2021-0032","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000In Turkey, where the environmental impact assessment (EIA) has been applied since 1993, there have been numerous amendments in the legal and administrative process of the EIA. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of those amendments to the EIA process.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000This paper evaluated EIA system performance in the context of procedural effectiveness in Turkey from the day implementation was begun. From its beginning to the present day, the positive and negative developments at the EIA process in Turkey caused by the amendments were evaluated and at which stages. Measures recommended increasing the effectiveness of each of the EIA systems were also identified.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000As the EIA Directive first came into force in the USA in 1970, EIA procedures have been widely adopted throughout the world. Although it has been implemented for many years, expectations regarding the EIA process have still not been realized which has forced countries to conduct studies to increase the effectiveness of the EIA process. Turkey, like other countries that are implementing the EIA, acknowledges that the EIA is a significant impact assessment tool and continues its studies to implement this system effectively. In this respect, in Turkey, where the EIA has been applied since 1993, there have been numerous amendments in the legal and administrative process of the EIA.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000The results obtained from this study were expected to facilitate the evaluation of the EIA process in Turkey and to guide other similar countries.\u0000","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74729250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The commons institution of Antarctica: a roadmap to governance of mankind resources","authors":"Paschalis Arvanitidis, Aikaterini Almyriotou","doi":"10.1108/JPPEL-02-2021-0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JPPEL-02-2021-0013","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000This paper aims to draw on Ostrom’s commons theory to analyse the governance regime of Antarctic as a commons institution. Antarctic is a peculiar territorial space on Earth, which due to its unique characteristics constitutes a global common resource that very much resembles outer space resources. On these grounds, the paper highlights successful, and less successful, arrangements developed in the Antarctic commons to be considered as a blueprint or roadmap towards the governance of outer space resources as a commons.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000The paper uses first, the social-ecological system (SES) framework to outline the characteristics of Antarctic as a commons institution, and second, Ostrom’s design principles to assess the commons institution of Antarctic. The Antarctic commons institution is used next, as an analogy to reflect on the challenges outer space global resource face and the way it could be managed.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The paper concludes that Antarctic enjoys a functional, credible and successful commons institution that should reinforce the twofold governance structure it exhibits. Similar cases of global common resources, such as these of outer space, that seek to establish a similar commons institution should take into account issues related the benefits spectrum and the credible commitment of actors to engage in different levels of the governance regime. What matters is not necessarily the form of the regime but rather how the commons as an institution functions, whether it fulfils the needs and interests of the driving actors and, on these grounds, how credible these arrangements are in the eyes of the committed members.\u0000\u0000\u0000Research limitations/implications\u0000Both Antarctica and outer space are rather unique cases and domains of multiple resources.\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000The paper provides an analogy to consider sustainable appropriation of global resources (“global commons”) for peace and prosperity to all.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000The paper is original, in the sense that according to the best of the authors’ knowledge, no published work has identified Antarctic as a commons institution or has used the aforementioned methodologies to analyse Antarctica as a commons and to employ their findings in providing directions for the design of appropriate governance frameworks for other resources that exhibit the characteristics of global commons, such as these of the outer space.\u0000","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90987581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"International environmental law and environmentally harmful space activities: learning from the past for a more sustainable future","authors":"Sara Dalledonne","doi":"10.1108/jppel-09-2020-0040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jppel-09-2020-0040","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000The purpose of this paper is to present and analyse part of the relevant legal instruments currently available for regulating environmentally harmful space activities.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000This paper opted for a functional research method combined with a comparative methodology. To make the argument, this paper relies on the contextual analysis of primary and secondary sources of law, instrument of soft law and the relevant background material (e.g. journal articles, textbooks, law reform and policy papers).\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The central section will focus on the principles of international environmental law to outline their utility in the contemporary context. Finally, the conclusive part will point out the several ways in which the use of analogies can shape the outer space regime, especially concerning how those principles that are developed to safeguard the Earth, can also be extended for the protection of the space ecosystem.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000Environmental hazards are rapidly increasing and the current international law and policy on planetary protection are inadequate to meet the challenges of the near future. There is no possibility of an environment-friendly and sustainable future if not strictly connecting it with a comprehensive and transparent acknowledgement of the human mistakes made on Earth. There are valuable lessons to be learned from our past, and it is under this perspective that the trend of polluting the outer space can be reverted. This paper fulfils an identified need to study the correlation between principles of international environmental law, space law and the current situation in the outer space.\u0000","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86295666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Situating real estate law for the new outer-space economy","authors":"R. Leshinsky","doi":"10.1108/jppel-02-2021-0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jppel-02-2021-0010","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000With current commercial space activities accelerating, the purpose of this paper is to contexualise enlivening the discipline of real estate law for outer space.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000Drawing on essential topics in real estate law, contracts and insurance, this paper discusses these themes in their terrestrial and extra-terrestrial contexts.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000Real estate law for the outer space environment carries many similarities to real estate law but also significant differences. At this early stage in human space exploration and travel, there is a need to deal more with goods/chattels (property assets); however, this will change as land – the Moon, asteroids, planets – are made available for mining and other activities. Given outer space activities carry high risk for spacecraft and humans, there are reciprocal lessons for real estate law and practice.\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000Real estate law for outer space is an area already in existence. However, as access to space develops further, particularly with inevitable human presence on the Moon and exploration to Mars, real estate law will also grow in importance and sophistication. Real estate law for outer space relies on contract and property law. These are levers for commercial activities, and a further array of complex law and governance – the Outer Space Treaties, international and national law, international custom, guidelines, codes and standards. Real estate law for space will require an interdisciplinary and global approach in an era where human needs are already reliant on goods and services derived from space, as well as in the quest for exploration beyond the earth and the moon itself.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000The time is ripe for space law to be taken into nuanced areas, with real estate law being an important step. Entrenched into the combined real estate and outer space disciplinary context must be consideration of the environment (earth and beyond), sustainability, heritage protection issues, etc., as well as ensuring outer space has equitable opportunities for all nations and citizens.\u0000","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82691544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"(Un)earthly governance: beyond functional frameworks to flourishing spacescapes","authors":"Clare M. Mouat, Erika J. Techera, L. Notebaert, Meredith Blake, Renae Barker","doi":"10.1108/jppel-02-2021-0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jppel-02-2021-0015","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000Humanity has a weakness in how we approach the “challenge” of using outer space. This paper aims to show how the global and national frameworks that address our planetary activities and crises are inadequate for the opportunities and challenges of life in outer space.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000The authors draw on multidisciplinary perspectives to refine an organising governance framework that better showcases the challenges and pathways needed for living and thriving in space-age. The authors prioritise two key pillars and overview the practical and social implications that space-age humanity must address.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000Social sciences and humanities are vital to problematising post-war colonial legacies of governance by distinguishing the unique and overlooked challenges for thriving and working offworld and identifying progressive research agendas.\u0000\u0000\u0000Research limitations/implications\u0000The highlighted agenda has implications for collaborative research institutes and project design. As the vital basis for continuous learning, university-based research institutes span bodies of knowledge, experience, convention and imagination that can support vibrant and overdue debate on good governance that is out of this world.\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000This expansive approach has practical implications for the decision-making processes and subjects of spacescape, from reconciling the space commons with prospecting and human occupation to potential governance regimes that capitalise on the zeal for moving beyond merely “existing” off-world.\u0000\u0000\u0000Social implications\u0000Examining the governance deficit as we pursue developing spacescape frontiers is an enriching (not reductionist) agenda that deliberately troubles the existing and emerging regime for governing our scientific and imagined off-world society.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000This framework appeals to humanity’s highest evolution in co-producing a fair and flourishing off-world governance framework (beyond replicating planetary regimes).\u0000","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75708039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Legal frameworks for urban agriculture: Sydney case study","authors":"Linda Corkery, P. Osmond, P. Williams","doi":"10.1108/jppel-06-2020-0030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jppel-06-2020-0030","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000This paper aims to examine the planning policy and legal framework governing the creation and operation of urban agriculture in Sydney, Australia’s global city. All levels of urban agriculture are considered – from domestic and small community gardens to large agribusiness – as all make an important contribution to agricultural production in an urban context.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000Using the Australian State of New South Wales and its capital Sydney, as a focus, the study examines the recent trend of the recognition and re-establishment of agriculture as a desired land use in cities. Three examples are selected for closer scrutiny – Horsley Park Urban Agriculture Precinct, located in the Western Sydney Parklands; City of Sydney’s City Farm, located in the inner suburb of St Peters; and the Western Sydney Aerotropolis Agribusiness Precinct, located at a new airport on the fringe of Sydney.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000As more city-dwellers embrace urban food production and as city authorities seek to encourage and facilitate farming activities, it is clear that regulatory structures which allow it to happen should be incorporated into urban planning legislation at (in the Australian context) state government level. If cities want to encourage urban agriculture, planning legislation needs to be part of the broader legal framework for enabling it to germinate and thrive.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000This paper explores the emergence of two new types of urban agriculture: first, the multi-functional, small-scale urban farming operation, situated conceptually between a community garden and a full-scale commercial agricultural enterprise, and located spatially in the midst of built-up urban form; and second, the intensive, high tech export-oriented model exemplified by the Aerotropolis Agribusiness Precinct.\u0000","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90485533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A review of property rights in outer space from a land management perspective","authors":"W. D. Vries, U. Hugentobler","doi":"10.1108/JPPEL-02-2021-0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JPPEL-02-2021-0011","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000In light of the discussions on outer space property management, this conceptual review paper aims to discuss and evaluate if, when and under which conditions certain land management and property right frameworks can apply to allocate and/or restrict property rights in outer space.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000This paper applies a pragmatic review approach which seeks to better understand if and how the basic tenets of the land management frameworks could better shape and revise the challenges in outer space regulations.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000Despite the fact that regulatory guidelines on outer space rights are existing, the analysis shows that these lack a number of practical tools and measures aiming at intervening if stakeholders do not follow the rules. With the use of land management frameworks, it is possible to derive policy options for making the outer space management more practical and action-oriented, in particular for the removal of space debris. These include amongst others more attention for formulating global public restrictions in outer space, incorporating regulatory guidelines for accessing open space regimes, addressing responsiveness and robustness in adherence and compliance to regulations\u0000\u0000\u0000Research limitations/implications\u0000Given the conceptual and discursive character of the paper, there are no specific empirical data, yet several recommendations for further research include expanding the boundary work between the land management and regulatory outer space domain.\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000The insights derived from land management and real estate related property theories could potentially provide new starting points for (re)formulating the regulatory framework for outer space property discourses.\u0000\u0000\u0000Social implications\u0000Interpreting the outer space regulations from known and practiced land management perspective helps to bridge the policy–society knowledge and necessity gap on outer space activities.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000The specific land management perspective and discursive analysis on outer space debris provide new options for devising and extending regulatory guidelines for assigning responsibilities on outer space debris and debris rights, restrictions and responsibilities.\u0000","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88361018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}