(Un)earthly governance: beyond functional frameworks to flourishing spacescapes

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW
Clare M. Mouat, Erika J. Techera, L. Notebaert, Meredith Blake, Renae Barker
{"title":"(Un)earthly governance: beyond functional frameworks to flourishing spacescapes","authors":"Clare M. Mouat, Erika J. Techera, L. Notebaert, Meredith Blake, Renae Barker","doi":"10.1108/jppel-02-2021-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nHumanity has a weakness in how we approach the “challenge” of using outer space. This paper aims to show how the global and national frameworks that address our planetary activities and crises are inadequate for the opportunities and challenges of life in outer space.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors draw on multidisciplinary perspectives to refine an organising governance framework that better showcases the challenges and pathways needed for living and thriving in space-age. The authors prioritise two key pillars and overview the practical and social implications that space-age humanity must address.\n\n\nFindings\nSocial sciences and humanities are vital to problematising post-war colonial legacies of governance by distinguishing the unique and overlooked challenges for thriving and working offworld and identifying progressive research agendas.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe highlighted agenda has implications for collaborative research institutes and project design. As the vital basis for continuous learning, university-based research institutes span bodies of knowledge, experience, convention and imagination that can support vibrant and overdue debate on good governance that is out of this world.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis expansive approach has practical implications for the decision-making processes and subjects of spacescape, from reconciling the space commons with prospecting and human occupation to potential governance regimes that capitalise on the zeal for moving beyond merely “existing” off-world.\n\n\nSocial implications\nExamining the governance deficit as we pursue developing spacescape frontiers is an enriching (not reductionist) agenda that deliberately troubles the existing and emerging regime for governing our scientific and imagined off-world society.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis framework appeals to humanity’s highest evolution in co-producing a fair and flourishing off-world governance framework (beyond replicating planetary regimes).\n","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jppel-02-2021-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Humanity has a weakness in how we approach the “challenge” of using outer space. This paper aims to show how the global and national frameworks that address our planetary activities and crises are inadequate for the opportunities and challenges of life in outer space. Design/methodology/approach The authors draw on multidisciplinary perspectives to refine an organising governance framework that better showcases the challenges and pathways needed for living and thriving in space-age. The authors prioritise two key pillars and overview the practical and social implications that space-age humanity must address. Findings Social sciences and humanities are vital to problematising post-war colonial legacies of governance by distinguishing the unique and overlooked challenges for thriving and working offworld and identifying progressive research agendas. Research limitations/implications The highlighted agenda has implications for collaborative research institutes and project design. As the vital basis for continuous learning, university-based research institutes span bodies of knowledge, experience, convention and imagination that can support vibrant and overdue debate on good governance that is out of this world. Practical implications This expansive approach has practical implications for the decision-making processes and subjects of spacescape, from reconciling the space commons with prospecting and human occupation to potential governance regimes that capitalise on the zeal for moving beyond merely “existing” off-world. Social implications Examining the governance deficit as we pursue developing spacescape frontiers is an enriching (not reductionist) agenda that deliberately troubles the existing and emerging regime for governing our scientific and imagined off-world society. Originality/value This framework appeals to humanity’s highest evolution in co-producing a fair and flourishing off-world governance framework (beyond replicating planetary regimes).
(非)地球治理:超越功能框架,走向繁荣的空间
人类在如何应对利用外层空间的“挑战”方面存在弱点。本文旨在表明,处理我们的地球活动和危机的全球和国家框架如何不足以应对外层空间生命的机遇和挑战。设计/方法/方法作者利用多学科的观点来完善一个组织治理框架,以更好地展示在太空时代生活和繁荣所需的挑战和途径。作者优先考虑了两个关键支柱,并概述了太空时代人类必须解决的实际和社会影响。社会科学和人文科学对于解决战后殖民统治遗留问题至关重要,因为它们区分了在世界之外繁荣和工作所面临的独特和被忽视的挑战,并确定了进步的研究议程。研究限制/启示突出的议程对合作研究机构和项目设计有启示。作为持续学习的重要基础,以大学为基础的研究机构涵盖了知识、经验、惯例和想象力,可以支持关于这个世界之外的善治的充满活力和早就应该进行的辩论。这种广泛的方法对太空逃生的决策过程和主题具有实际意义,从协调空间公地与勘探和人类占领的关系,到利用超越“现有”的热情的潜在治理机制。在我们追求开发太空边界的过程中,审视治理赤字是一个丰富的(而不是简化的)议程,它故意给治理我们科学的和想象中的外世界社会的现有和新兴政权带来麻烦。原创性/价值这个框架呼吁人类在共同创造一个公平和繁荣的外世界治理框架方面的最高进化(超越复制行星制度)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信