Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal最新文献_第5页

“Soaring Towards the Sun”: The Icarus Complex in Daphne Du Maurier’s The Flight of the Falcon “飞向太阳”:达芙妮·杜穆里埃的《猎鹰的飞行》中的伊卡洛斯情结

IF 0.1

Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal Pub Date : 2021-11-19 DOI: 10.4000/lisa.13659

Helena Habibi

引用次数: 0

Daphne Du Maurier: a Critical Bibliography 达芙妮·杜穆里埃:一个批判书目

IF 0.1

Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal Pub Date : 2021-11-19 DOI: 10.4000/lisa.13792

Xavier Lachazette

引用次数: 0

Rule Britannia, Brexit and Cornish Identity 统治大不列颠，脱欧和康沃尔身份

IF 0.1

Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal Pub Date : 2021-11-19 DOI: 10.4000/lisa.13794

E. Westland

引用次数: 0

Looking for “I”: Casting the Unnamed Heroine in Alfred Hitchcock and David O. Selznick’s Adaptation of Rebecca 寻找“我”:在阿尔弗雷德·希区柯克和大卫·o·塞尔兹尼克改编的《丽贝卡》中寻找无名女主角

IF 0.1

Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal Pub Date : 2021-11-19 DOI: 10.4000/lisa.13470

Milan Hain

引用次数: 0

Gender and Generic Clashes in The Years Between (Compton Bennett, 1946) 《性别与一般冲突》(康普顿·贝内特，1946)

IF 0.1

Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal Pub Date : 2021-11-19 DOI: 10.4000/lisa.13757

N. Cloarec

引用次数: 0

Enter Sir Alfred, or Hitchcock’s Three Du Mauriers 阿尔弗雷德爵士或希区柯克的《杜穆里埃三人》登场了

IF 0.1

Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal Pub Date : 2021-11-19 DOI: 10.4000/lisa.13412

Jean-Loup Bourget

引用次数: 0

Potential risks to the National Health Service (NHS) of a Post-Brexit US Trade Deal 英国脱欧后美国贸易协议对英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的潜在风险

IF 0.1

Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal Pub Date : 2021-07-15 DOI: 10.4000/LISA.13088

Louise Dalingwater

{"title":"Potential risks to the National Health Service (NHS) of a Post-Brexit US Trade Deal","authors":"Louise Dalingwater","doi":"10.4000/LISA.13088","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4000/LISA.13088","url":null,"abstract":"At the very heart of the pro-Brexit narrative, currently supported by Eurosceptic politicians such as Boris Johnson, Michael Gove and David Davis, and Conservative think tanks including the Institute of Economic Affairs and Adam Smith’s Institute, is the belief that breaking European ties will enable Britain to reunite with the Anglosphere and notably its treasured ally, the United States. There are many indications that a post Brexit trade deal is in the pipeline with Donald Trump’s declaration in July 2019 that a “very substantial” trade deal was underway. Moreover, in late November 2019, Jeremy Corbyn contended that Conservatives were negotiating a secret trade deal containing clauses which would open the NHS up to American pharmaceutical companies. The central focus of this paper is thus to examine the likely consequences of a post-Brexit trade deal between the US and the UK and to consider to what extent it could undermine the UK’s ability to provide a free, universal public health service. In particular, it will examine empirical evidence on the impacts that FTAs have already had on access to medicine for countries which have been signatory to bilateral and plurilateral trade deals. Particular country contexts of price regimes for medication will be reviewed. It will also consider other FTA clauses such as public procurement and Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) and their potential to disrupt national governments’ ability to protect public health service provision. Such evidence can then be used to hypothesise about the potential risks for Britain post Brexit.","PeriodicalId":41099,"journal":{"name":"Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74093302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Mobilizing the Past: Germany and the Second World War in Debates on Brexit 动员过去:英国脱欧辩论中的德国和第二次世界大战

IF 0.1

Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal Pub Date : 2021-07-15 DOI: 10.4000/LISA.13019

Thomas W. Williams

{"title":"Mobilizing the Past: Germany and the Second World War in Debates on Brexit","authors":"Thomas W. Williams","doi":"10.4000/LISA.13019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4000/LISA.13019","url":null,"abstract":"In 2018 the outgoing German ambassador to the UK, Peter Ammon, suggested that a sense of national identity based on how Britain had “stood alone” during the Second World War, combined with a negative perception of Germany’s supposed domination of the EU, had fuelled Euroscepticism and contributed to the success of the Leave campaign in the 2016 Brexit referendum. While recognising that references to Britain’s wartime past and fears of German power in the present-day EU are by no means identical issues, this article traces the frequent convergence of these two themes in Eurosceptic rhetoric during the decade preceding Britain’s exit from the EU on 31 January 2020.It reveals that concerns about Germany’s “domination” of the European project, an important theme in British Euroscepticism since Thatcher, resurfaced in the early 2010s, particularly in the context of the Eurozone debt crisis. The Second World War was subsequently a frequent point of historical reference during debates on Brexit, primarily though not exclusively among Eurosceptics. While specifically anti-German uses of the Second World War were less common during the 2016 referendum campaign, they re-emerged with particular bitterness during the difficult post-referendum negotiations.","PeriodicalId":41099,"journal":{"name":"Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74489646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

In the Name of the British People: Words and Democracy in Three Post-Brexit Films 《以英国人民的名义:三部后英国脱欧电影中的词汇与民主

IF 0.1

Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal Pub Date : 2021-07-15 DOI: 10.4000/LISA.13168

N. Cloarec

{"title":"In the Name of the British People: Words and Democracy in Three Post-Brexit Films","authors":"N. Cloarec","doi":"10.4000/LISA.13168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4000/LISA.13168","url":null,"abstract":"At a time when the British political scene and media environment have been saturated with references to “the people” and “the people’s voice”, films may seem the ideal means to question what it means to “represent” something or someone, and reveal how the term of “people”, while being overused and misused, offers a floating signifier that conjures up all types of projections. This article focuses on three films whose reception has been skewed by the context of Brexit, and more particularly by the issues related to the referendum and the concomitant political instrumentalisation of the notion of “the people’s voice”. My contention is that the three films interrogate the very notion of representation, namely what representing a nation and its “people” means. Instead of claiming they convey the “true” voice of the people, each film dramatises the staging of a battle of words, which is thus construed as the essence of the democratic debate. Even more specifically, each film offers a reflection on the political power of words through its cinematographic tools. In each case, albeit with obvious stylistic differences, both mise en scene and montage give a proper dialectical dimension to the film discourse insofar as the narratives are built on a series of ruptures or contrasts that are orchestrated into an organic whole.","PeriodicalId":41099,"journal":{"name":"Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82961363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Brexit Vote and The Trump Vote: A comparative study of the common trends and factors that led to a populist radical right vote in Britain and the United States 英国脱欧和特朗普投票:导致英国和美国民粹主义极右翼投票的共同趋势和因素的比较研究

IF 0.1

Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal Pub Date : 2021-07-15 DOI: 10.4000/LISA.13054

Laetitia Langlois

引用次数: 1