Mobilizing the Past: Germany and the Second World War in Debates on Brexit

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Thomas W. Williams
{"title":"Mobilizing the Past: Germany and the Second World War in Debates on Brexit","authors":"Thomas W. Williams","doi":"10.4000/LISA.13019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2018 the outgoing German ambassador to the UK, Peter Ammon, suggested that a sense of national identity based on how Britain had “stood alone” during the Second World War, combined with a negative perception of Germany’s supposed domination of the EU, had fuelled Euroscepticism and contributed to the success of the Leave campaign in the 2016 Brexit referendum. While recognising that references to Britain’s wartime past and fears of German power in the present-day EU are by no means identical issues, this article traces the frequent convergence of these two themes in Eurosceptic rhetoric during the decade preceding Britain’s exit from the EU on 31 January 2020.It reveals that concerns about Germany’s “domination” of the European project, an important theme in British Euroscepticism since Thatcher, resurfaced in the early 2010s, particularly in the context of the Eurozone debt crisis. The Second World War was subsequently a frequent point of historical reference during debates on Brexit, primarily though not exclusively among Eurosceptics. While specifically anti-German uses of the Second World War were less common during the 2016 referendum campaign, they re-emerged with particular bitterness during the difficult post-referendum negotiations.","PeriodicalId":41099,"journal":{"name":"Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/LISA.13019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In 2018 the outgoing German ambassador to the UK, Peter Ammon, suggested that a sense of national identity based on how Britain had “stood alone” during the Second World War, combined with a negative perception of Germany’s supposed domination of the EU, had fuelled Euroscepticism and contributed to the success of the Leave campaign in the 2016 Brexit referendum. While recognising that references to Britain’s wartime past and fears of German power in the present-day EU are by no means identical issues, this article traces the frequent convergence of these two themes in Eurosceptic rhetoric during the decade preceding Britain’s exit from the EU on 31 January 2020.It reveals that concerns about Germany’s “domination” of the European project, an important theme in British Euroscepticism since Thatcher, resurfaced in the early 2010s, particularly in the context of the Eurozone debt crisis. The Second World War was subsequently a frequent point of historical reference during debates on Brexit, primarily though not exclusively among Eurosceptics. While specifically anti-German uses of the Second World War were less common during the 2016 referendum campaign, they re-emerged with particular bitterness during the difficult post-referendum negotiations.
动员过去:英国脱欧辩论中的德国和第二次世界大战
2018年,即将离任的德国驻英国大使彼得·阿蒙(Peter Ammon)表示,基于英国在二战期间“孤立无援”的国家认同感,加上对德国所谓的欧盟主导地位的负面看法,助长了欧洲怀疑主义,并促成了2016年脱欧公投中脱欧运动的成功。虽然认识到提及英国的战时历史和对当今欧盟中德国力量的恐惧绝不是相同的问题,但本文追溯了在英国于2020年1月31日退出欧盟之前的十年里,欧洲怀疑论者的言论中这两个主题的频繁融合。它揭示出,对德国“主宰”欧洲计划的担忧——自撒切尔(Thatcher)以来英国欧洲怀疑主义的一个重要主题——在2010年代初重新浮出水面,尤其是在欧元区债务危机的背景下。随后,在有关英国退欧的辩论中,第二次世界大战经常成为历史参考点,主要是(但不完全是)欧洲怀疑论者。虽然在2016年的公投活动中,专门针对二战的反德言论不那么常见,但在公投后艰难的谈判中,它们再次出现,并带来了特别的苦涩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal
Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书