The Brexit Vote and The Trump Vote: A comparative study of the common trends and factors that led to a populist radical right vote in Britain and the United States

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Laetitia Langlois
{"title":"The Brexit Vote and The Trump Vote: A comparative study of the common trends and factors that led to a populist radical right vote in Britain and the United States","authors":"Laetitia Langlois","doi":"10.4000/LISA.13054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The two symbols of Western liberal democracies – Britain and the US – became in 2016 hotbeds of radical right populism. The vote for Brexit and Donald Trump’s election represent two spectacular populist victories and this article will highlight the strikingly similar dynamics at work in both elections. We will see that the two populist leaders, Nigel Farage in Britain and Donald Trump in the US, mobilised the same arguments and themes to connect to an audience which for years had nourished resentment and anger at the way traditional politicians had governed national politics in their respective countries. Thus, with the Brexit and Trump victories, fringe narratives became mainstream politics and upset the established political order. Nativism, racism and xenophobia, anti-establishment attitudes became the dominant themes of the political debate. It is important to understand how two major Western democracies surrendered to the populist calls and this article tries to provide an analysis on this populist phenomenon in Britain and the US.","PeriodicalId":41099,"journal":{"name":"Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal","volume":"261 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/LISA.13054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The two symbols of Western liberal democracies – Britain and the US – became in 2016 hotbeds of radical right populism. The vote for Brexit and Donald Trump’s election represent two spectacular populist victories and this article will highlight the strikingly similar dynamics at work in both elections. We will see that the two populist leaders, Nigel Farage in Britain and Donald Trump in the US, mobilised the same arguments and themes to connect to an audience which for years had nourished resentment and anger at the way traditional politicians had governed national politics in their respective countries. Thus, with the Brexit and Trump victories, fringe narratives became mainstream politics and upset the established political order. Nativism, racism and xenophobia, anti-establishment attitudes became the dominant themes of the political debate. It is important to understand how two major Western democracies surrendered to the populist calls and this article tries to provide an analysis on this populist phenomenon in Britain and the US.
英国脱欧和特朗普投票:导致英国和美国民粹主义极右翼投票的共同趋势和因素的比较研究
西方自由民主的两个象征——英国和美国——在2016年成为激进右翼民粹主义的温床。英国脱欧公投和唐纳德•特朗普(Donald Trump)当选代表了民粹主义的两次惊人胜利,本文将重点介绍两场选举中惊人相似的运作机制。我们将看到,两位民粹主义领导人——英国的奈杰尔•法拉奇(Nigel Farage)和美国的唐纳德•特朗普(Donald Trump)——利用同样的论点和主题,来吸引多年来对各自国家传统政客治理国家政治的方式心怀怨恨和愤怒的听众。因此,随着英国脱欧和特朗普的胜利,边缘叙事成为主流政治,扰乱了既定的政治秩序。本土主义、种族主义和仇外心理、反建制态度成为政治辩论的主要主题。了解两个主要的西方民主国家是如何屈服于民粹主义的呼吁是很重要的,本文试图对英国和美国的民粹主义现象进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal
Revue LISA-LISA E-Journal HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书