SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY最新文献_第3页

Animal research, ethical boundary-work, and the geographies of veterinary expertise. 动物研究、伦理边界工作和兽医专业知识的地域性。

IF 0.5 2区文学

SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-16 DOI: 10.1111/tran.12594

Alistair Anderson, Pru Hobson-West

{"title":"Animal research, ethical boundary-work, and the geographies of veterinary expertise.","authors":"Alistair Anderson, Pru Hobson-West","doi":"10.1111/tran.12594","DOIUrl":"10.1111/tran.12594","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The veterinary profession has been relatively understudied in social science, though recent work has highlighted the geographic dimensions of veterinary expertise. This paper draws on in-depth qualitative interviews with Named Veterinary Surgeons (NVSs) working in UK animal research to demonstrate how and why they distinguish between ethical aspects of veterinary work in the spaces of the laboratory and general clinical practice. The paper mobilises the sociological concept of ethical boundary-work to help understand how animal research - often assumed to represent a contentious ethical space - is constructed positively as a space for veterinary work. Findings suggest first, that NVSs differentiate between laboratory veterinary-work and clinical work based on the scale at which veterinary expertise functions in the provision of healthcare to animals. Second, NVSs highlight a geography of veterinary authority in which veterinary expertise is felt to be more successfully applied in the laboratory compared with the clinic, where professional expertise competes with other sources of information and clients' finances and behaviours. Third, NVSs articulate a geography of consistency in which veterinary care in the laboratory is claimed to be more consistent between animals, as opposed to in the clinic, where animal experience may be influenced by individual owner characteristics. Overall, we show how through engaging in this kind of ethical boundary-work NVSs are not only presenting a form of scientific practice as 'ethical', they are also constructing a professional topology of veterinary practice and expertise. Finally, the paper argues for greater attentiveness to veterinary geographies beyond the more routine spaces of veterinary practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":39634,"journal":{"name":"SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY","volume":"23 1","pages":"491-505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10946936/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90353532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Drowning the First Folio: Co-laboring and the Value of Knowledge in The Tempest 淹没第一对开本:《暴风雨》中的合作与知识价值

2区文学

SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/sq/quad025

Nedda Mehdizadeh

引用次数: 0

Contributors 贡献者

2区文学

SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/sq/quad035

引用次数: 0

Shakespeare and the Cultivation of Difference: Race and Conduct in the Early Modern World. By Patricia Akhimie 莎士比亚与差异的培养:近代早期世界的种族与行为。Patricia Akhimie著

2区文学

SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/sq/quad032

Kimberly Anne Coles

引用次数: 0

Shakespeare's Chair: Material Culture and Literary Phantasms 莎士比亚的椅子:物质文化与文学幻象

IF 0.3 2区文学

SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1093/sq/quad016

Michał Mencfel

引用次数: 0

Who Rpinted Shakespeare's Fourth Folio? 谁印刷了莎士比亚的《第四对开本》?

IF 0.3 2区文学

SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1093/sq/quad021

Christopher N. Warren, Sam Lemley, D. Schuldt, Elizabeth Dieterich, Laura S DeLuca, Max G’Sell, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Kari Thomas, Kartik Goyal, Nikolai Vogler

{"title":"Who Rpinted Shakespeare's Fourth Folio?","authors":"Christopher N. Warren, Sam Lemley, D. Schuldt, Elizabeth Dieterich, Laura S DeLuca, Max G’Sell, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Kari Thomas, Kartik Goyal, Nikolai Vogler","doi":"10.1093/sq/quad021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sq/quad021","url":null,"abstract":"“R OF DENMARK.” WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS INFAMOUS LARGE-LETTER BLUNDER IN SHAKESPEARE’S FOURTH FOLIO (1685, hereafter F4)—one of the most “embarrassing, excruciating, and egregious errors in English”? The “HAMLET / RPINCE of DENMARK” internal title page appeared on signature 3E6r, page 59, in the “Tragedies” section (figure 1). According to Fredson Bowers, writing in Shakespeare Quarterly in 1951, we will never know the printer of that section “until we know everything there is to be learned about seventeenth-century types.” Bowers doubted we could ever list the full set of F4’s printers because F4 was printed anonymously, and the volume left few clues about its printers. While George Watson Cole’s 1909 “examination of the letterpress show[ed] that a copy of the Third Folio was apparently broken into three portions and sent to three different printers,” Bowers himself only got as far as attributing the first of F4’s three separately paginated parts. The purpose of this note is to identify the other two printers involved in F4, one of whom, John Macock, was the printer whose shop was responsible for F4’s Hamlet. Regrettably, this short note does not include everything there is to be learned about seventeenth-century types.","PeriodicalId":39634,"journal":{"name":"SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY","volume":"74 1","pages":"139 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42858629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Fictions of Consent: Slavery, Servitude, and Free Service in Early Modern England. By Urvashi Chakravarty 同意的虚构:近代早期英国的奴隶制、奴役和自由服务。Urvashi Chakravarty著

IF 0.3 2区文学

SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1093/sq/quad019

Mira Assaf Kafantaris

引用次数: 1

John Fletcher’s Rome: Questioning the Classics. By Domenico Lovascio 约翰·弗莱彻的《罗马：质疑经典》。作者：Domenico Lovascio

IF 0.3 2区文学

SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1093/sq/quad012

Joseph F. Stephenson

引用次数: 1

Contributors 贡献者