Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process最新文献

Organizing Reentry: How Racial Colorblindness Structures the Post-imprisonment Terrain 组织重返社会:种族色盲如何构成监禁后的地形

Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060006

Lucius Couloute

引用次数: 2

Race and Organization Theory: Reflections and Open Questions 种族与组织理论:反思与开放性问题

Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060002

F. Rojas

引用次数: 6

Race, Knowledge, and Tasks: Racialized Occupational Trajectories 种族、知识和任务:种族化的职业轨迹

Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060007

Melissa Abad

引用次数: 4

Fighting (for) Charter School Expansion: Racial Resources and Ideological Consistency 争取特许学校扩张:种族资源与意识形态一致性

Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060005

Kyla Walters

{"title":"Fighting (for) Charter School Expansion: Racial Resources and Ideological Consistency","authors":"Kyla Walters","doi":"10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060005","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \u0000Charter schools are an increasingly popular form of publicly funded school choice. Racially framed as a policy to narrow academic achievement and opportunity gaps, charter schools disproportionately serve Black and Latinx students. In 2016, “lifting the cap” on the number of charter schools allowed in Massachusetts became an intensely fought ballot referendum. Drawing on racial formation and resource mobilization theories, I argue that resources developed and mobilized in political campaigns or social movements have analytically relevant racial dimensions. They are “racial resources” or value-producing entities that are imbued with meaning about race categories, racial systems, and/or racial ideologies. The anti-expansion’s interracial coalition was a decisive factor in the campaign, because the coalition implemented a shared decision-making structure to develop a more robust and ideologically consistent strategy for mobilizing their racial resources. These resources include a local base of racially diverse spokespeople who brought key cultural resources – legitimacy, authenticity, and trust – to the campaign, as well as race-conscious and race-neutral message framing.","PeriodicalId":394736,"journal":{"name":"Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126319204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Colorblind Organization 色盲组织

Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060008

Victor Ray, Danielle M Purifoy

{"title":"The Colorblind Organization","authors":"Victor Ray, Danielle M Purifoy","doi":"10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060008","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \u0000This chapter connects colorblind ideology to organizational processes. Despite advances in our thinking about colorblindness as the current dominant racial ideology, scholars are reluctant to tie this ideology to organizational processes – creating the impression that colorblindness is an individual attribute rather than a structural phenomenon. Because the frames of colorblindness are usually interpreted through interviews – as opposed to organizational practices – focusing on the frames reinforces the sense that ideologies are free-floating prejudices unconnected to social structures. In this theoretical piece, we draw on the organizational literature, to tie Bonilla-Silva’s colorblind frames – abstract liberalism, cultural racism, the minimization of racism, and naturalization – to organizational processes, showing how mundane organizational procedures reinforce structural inequality. We argue that organizational policies and practices rely on normative Whiteness, devaluing the cultural norms of nonwhites, and passing those practices to successive administrations. Ostensibly nonracial procedures such as hiring, promotion, and performance reviews are rife with racialized meanings.","PeriodicalId":394736,"journal":{"name":"Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process","volume":"168 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116182450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 15

Theorizing a Racialized Congressional Workplace 理论化国会工作场所的种族化

Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060010

James R. Jones

{"title":"Theorizing a Racialized Congressional Workplace","authors":"James R. Jones","doi":"10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060010","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \u0000The US Congress is a racialized governing institution that plays an important role structuring the racial hierarchy in the nation. Despite Congress’s influence, there is little theoretical and empirical research on its racialized structure – that is, how it operates and the racial processes that shape it. This lacuna has developed from a narrow conceptualization of Congress as a political institution, and it ignores how it is a multifaceted organization that features a large and complex workplace. Congressional staff are the invisible force in American policymaking, and it is through their assistance that members of Congress can fulfill their responsibilities. However, the congressional workplace is stratified along racial lines. In this chapter, I theorize how the congressional workplace became racialized, and I identify the racial processes that maintain a racialized workplace today. I investigate how lawmakers have organized their workplace and made decisions about which workers would be appropriate for different types of roles in the Capitol. Through a racial analysis of the congressional workplace, I show a connection between Congress as an institution and workplace and how racial domination is a thread that connects and animates both its formal and informal structures.","PeriodicalId":394736,"journal":{"name":"Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125330768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Bureaucracy, Discrimination, and the Racialized Character of Organizational Life 官僚主义、歧视与组织生活的种族化特征

Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060009

R. Byron, Vincent J. Roscigno

{"title":"Bureaucracy, Discrimination, and the Racialized Character of Organizational Life","authors":"R. Byron, Vincent J. Roscigno","doi":"10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060009","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \u0000Research on racial inequality in organizations typically (1) assumes constraining effects of bureaucratic structure on the capacity of powerful actors to discriminate or (2) reverts to individualistic interpretations emphasizing implicit biases or self-expressed motivations of gatekeepers. Such orientations are theoretically problematic because they ignore how bureaucratic structures and practices are immersed within and permeated by culturally normative racial meanings and hierarchies. This decoupling ultimately provides a protective, legitimating umbrella for organizational practices and gatekeeping actors – an umbrella under which differential treatment is enabled and discursively portrayed as meritocratic or even organizationally good. In this chapter, we develop a race-centered conception of organizational practices by drawing from a sample of over 100 content-coded workplace discrimination cases and analyzing both discriminatory encounters and employer justifications for inequality-generating conduct. Results show three non-mutually exclusive patterns that highlight the fundamentally racial character of organizations: (1) the racialization of bureaucracies themselves via the organizational valuation and pursuit of “ideal workers,” (2) the ostensibly bureaucratic and neutral, yet inequitable, policing of minority worker performance, and; (3) the everyday enforcement of racial status boundaries through harassment on the job, protection afforded to perpetrators, and bureaucratically enforced retaliation aimed at victims. The permeation of race-laden presumptions into organizations, their activation relative to oversight and bureaucratic policing, and the invoking of colorblind bureaucratic discourses and policies to legitimate discriminatory conduct are crucial to understanding the organizational dimensions of racial inequality production. We end by discussing the implications of our argument and results for future theory and research.","PeriodicalId":394736,"journal":{"name":"Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process","volume":"38 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129233683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

Race and Higher Education: Fields, Organizations, and Expertise 种族与高等教育:领域、组织和专业知识

Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060003

Christie Smith

{"title":"Race and Higher Education: Fields, Organizations, and Expertise","authors":"Christie Smith","doi":"10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060003","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \u0000How do racial meanings structure the institution of higher education and the organizations and networks it encompasses? This chapter develops a theory of racial activation to usefully link conceptualizations of race and organizations. This theory examines how racial meanings shape organizational fields, forms or types of organizations, and the strategic use of racial meanings by actors in organizations to create a more robust understanding of the processes by which organizations are themselves made racialized. Predominant scholarship on race can largely be characterized as theorizing the mechanisms by which race is constructed or uncovering the patterns and consequences of inequality along racial lines. Much existing research hovers above at a macro level where national, state, and global powers are understood to impose racial categories, symbols, meanings, and rules onto daily life while higher education has largely been studied as a site where we see the effects of broader social disparities play out. This chapter draws on insights from inhabited institutionalism to develop a theory of racial activation that usefully links conceptualizations of race and organizations to provide an intersectional and interactional approach to the study of fields.","PeriodicalId":394736,"journal":{"name":"Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134560629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

The Unbroken South: Political Parties and the Articulation of White Supremacy 《完整的南方:政党与白人至上主义的表达

Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060004

C. Leon

引用次数: 0

Prelims 预备考试

Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process Pub Date : 2019-05-08 DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x20190000060012

引用次数: 0