Bureaucracy, Discrimination, and the Racialized Character of Organizational Life

R. Byron, Vincent J. Roscigno
{"title":"Bureaucracy, Discrimination, and the Racialized Character of Organizational Life","authors":"R. Byron, Vincent J. Roscigno","doi":"10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nResearch on racial inequality in organizations typically (1) assumes constraining effects of bureaucratic structure on the capacity of powerful actors to discriminate or (2) reverts to individualistic interpretations emphasizing implicit biases or self-expressed motivations of gatekeepers. Such orientations are theoretically problematic because they ignore how bureaucratic structures and practices are immersed within and permeated by culturally normative racial meanings and hierarchies. This decoupling ultimately provides a protective, legitimating umbrella for organizational practices and gatekeeping actors – an umbrella under which differential treatment is enabled and discursively portrayed as meritocratic or even organizationally good. In this chapter, we develop a race-centered conception of organizational practices by drawing from a sample of over 100 content-coded workplace discrimination cases and analyzing both discriminatory encounters and employer justifications for inequality-generating conduct. Results show three non-mutually exclusive patterns that highlight the fundamentally racial character of organizations: (1) the racialization of bureaucracies themselves via the organizational valuation and pursuit of “ideal workers,” (2) the ostensibly bureaucratic and neutral, yet inequitable, policing of minority worker performance, and; (3) the everyday enforcement of racial status boundaries through harassment on the job, protection afforded to perpetrators, and bureaucratically enforced retaliation aimed at victims. The permeation of race-laden presumptions into organizations, their activation relative to oversight and bureaucratic policing, and the invoking of colorblind bureaucratic discourses and policies to legitimate discriminatory conduct are crucial to understanding the organizational dimensions of racial inequality production. We end by discussing the implications of our argument and results for future theory and research.","PeriodicalId":394736,"journal":{"name":"Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process","volume":"38 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Abstract Research on racial inequality in organizations typically (1) assumes constraining effects of bureaucratic structure on the capacity of powerful actors to discriminate or (2) reverts to individualistic interpretations emphasizing implicit biases or self-expressed motivations of gatekeepers. Such orientations are theoretically problematic because they ignore how bureaucratic structures and practices are immersed within and permeated by culturally normative racial meanings and hierarchies. This decoupling ultimately provides a protective, legitimating umbrella for organizational practices and gatekeeping actors – an umbrella under which differential treatment is enabled and discursively portrayed as meritocratic or even organizationally good. In this chapter, we develop a race-centered conception of organizational practices by drawing from a sample of over 100 content-coded workplace discrimination cases and analyzing both discriminatory encounters and employer justifications for inequality-generating conduct. Results show three non-mutually exclusive patterns that highlight the fundamentally racial character of organizations: (1) the racialization of bureaucracies themselves via the organizational valuation and pursuit of “ideal workers,” (2) the ostensibly bureaucratic and neutral, yet inequitable, policing of minority worker performance, and; (3) the everyday enforcement of racial status boundaries through harassment on the job, protection afforded to perpetrators, and bureaucratically enforced retaliation aimed at victims. The permeation of race-laden presumptions into organizations, their activation relative to oversight and bureaucratic policing, and the invoking of colorblind bureaucratic discourses and policies to legitimate discriminatory conduct are crucial to understanding the organizational dimensions of racial inequality production. We end by discussing the implications of our argument and results for future theory and research.
官僚主义、歧视与组织生活的种族化特征
关于组织中种族不平等的研究通常(1)假设官僚结构对有权力的行为者的歧视能力有约束作用,或(2)回归个人主义的解释,强调看门人的内隐偏见或自我表达的动机。这种取向在理论上是有问题的,因为它们忽视了官僚结构和实践是如何被文化上规范的种族意义和等级所浸没和渗透的。这种脱钩最终为组织实践和守门人提供了一个保护性的、合法的保护伞——在这个保护伞下,不同的待遇得以实现,并被描述为精英主义,甚至是组织上的好。在本章中,我们通过从100多个内容编码的工作场所歧视案例中提取样本,并分析歧视遭遇和雇主对产生不平等行为的理由,形成了一个以种族为中心的组织实践概念。研究结果显示,三种不相互排斥的模式突出了组织的根本种族特征:(1)通过组织评估和追求“理想员工”,官僚机构本身的种族化;(2)表面上官僚主义和中立,但不公平,对少数族裔员工的绩效进行监管;(3)通过工作中的骚扰、对肇事者的保护以及针对受害者的官僚报复等方式,日常执行种族地位界限。种族假设渗透到组织中,与监督和官僚警务相关的假设被激活,以及援引无视肤色的官僚话语和政策来合法化歧视行为,对于理解种族不平等产生的组织层面至关重要。最后,我们讨论了我们的论点和结果对未来理论和研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信