Journal of Intellectual Property Rights最新文献_第2页

Design Law Declared by the Supreme Court of India 印度最高法院宣布的外观设计法

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i3.601

引用次数: 1

A Paradigm Shift in Indian and International Patent Regime- Critical Review on Ex- and Current Scenario (Covid-19 Impact) 印度和国际专利制度的范式转变——对过去和当前情景(Covid-19影响)的批判性回顾

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i4.1056

引用次数: 1

Impact of Online Digital Piracy on the Indian Film Industry: An Empirical Investigation into Consumer Behaviour 网络数字盗版对印度电影业的影响:消费者行为的实证调查

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i1.537

引用次数: 1

The Crossroad between Intellectual Property and Clinical Trials: Balancing Incentives for Innovation with Access to Healthcare 知识产权和临床试验之间的十字路口:平衡创新激励与获得医疗保健

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i4.77

引用次数: 1

Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A View through the Articles Published in the Second Decade of Twenty-First Century (2015–2019) — V 《知识产权学报》在知识产权研究中的贡献——从21世纪第二个十年(2015-2019)论文看——V

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i5.3403

{"title":"Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A View through the Articles Published in the Second Decade of Twenty-First Century (2015–2019) — V","authors":"","doi":"10.56042/jipr.v28i5.3403","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v28i5.3403","url":null,"abstract":"This Paper seeks to review the articles published in the Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR)in the second half of the second decade of the twenty-first century from Volume 20 (1) (2015) to Volume 24 (6) (2019). This is the fifth paper on the theme ‗JIPR in IPR Research‘ and proceeds with the same method and arguments as adopted and developed in the previous four papers published on the theme. In this decade, a total of 144 articles were published including one Special Issue on the theme ‗New Technologies, Climate Change and IPR‘. These 144 articles were published in 30 issues of 5 volumes. JIPR in this decade published 6 regular issues in Volumes 20 (2015) and 22 (2017). Whereas, the Issues 4 and 5 of Volume 21 (2016); Issues 2 and 3, and 4 and 5 of Volume 23 (2018); and Issues (1) and (2), (3) and (4), and (5) and (6) of Volume 24 (2019) were published jointly. Out of total articles published in JIPR till Volume 24, the number of articles published in this decade (144) constitutes 17.60 (point six zero) percent, and the contribution of this decade (2015–2019) is 19.27 (point two seven) percent.","PeriodicalId":39166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135799277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Emerging Technologies and Intellectual Property Rights: A Cross-Jurisdictional Examination of AI and Patent Laws in India and the USA 新兴技术和知识产权:印度和美国人工智能和专利法的跨司法管辖区考察

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i5.399

{"title":"Emerging Technologies and Intellectual Property Rights: A Cross-Jurisdictional Examination of AI and Patent Laws in India and the USA","authors":"","doi":"10.56042/jipr.v28i5.399","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v28i5.399","url":null,"abstract":"The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is swiftly reaching a critical juncture, which will greatly affect a multitude of sectors such as business, healthcare, and agriculture. While the enhanced capabilities of AI offer considerable potential for beneficial outcomes, they also present a substantial obstacle to current legal structures regulating patents. This conundrum carries extensive consequences for creativity, economic growth, and the broader community.[i] In light of this, it is critical that stakeholders, including patent experts, policymakers, and academics, engage in robust dialogues to develop strategies for encouraging innovation and navigating the complex legal terrain that arises from patent law in the AI paradigm.[ii] The stakes are high, and the consequences of failing to address these challenges could be dire. In light of the current context, this paper examines various facets of patent law as they relate to AI creations, encompassing patent eligibility principles, the patentability of AI in the United States and India, and the more extensive consequences of AI and patent law's convergence. The paper offers a comparative analysis of the legal structures in these two nations, illuminating the similarities and distinctions in how AI is addressed in each legal system. In conclusion, the paper proposes a set of suggestions for modifying legal frameworks to keep up with the rapid advancements in AI technology. By concentrating on the difficulties that emerge from the interplay of AI and patent law, the paper underscores the necessity for continuous discussion and cooperation among all parties involved, ensuring that creativity flourishes in this rapidly changing and exhilarating domain. &nbsp","PeriodicalId":39166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135799279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Rethinking the Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Pharmaceutical Industry of Saudi Arabia 知识产权在沙特阿拉伯制药业中的作用再思考

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i1.536

引用次数: 1

Can Artificial Intelligence (AI) Machine be Granted Inventorship in India? 印度可以授予人工智能(AI)机器发明权吗?

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i2.1268

G. R. Raghavender, Gurujit Singh

{"title":"Can Artificial Intelligence (AI) Machine be Granted Inventorship in India?","authors":"G. R. Raghavender, Gurujit Singh","doi":"10.56042/jipr.v28i2.1268","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v28i2.1268","url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) is prolific emerging algorithmic general purpose technology that helps inventors in the innovation process or is a component of an invention. AI-assisted inventions and other computer-related inventions (CRIs) generally have few significant differences. A simple instrument for creativity, machines are now a significant contribution to creation because to AI advancements. Medical researchers are using AI machines to find new drugs. These automated systems, also known as “innovative AI”, have been helping to develop new inventions with little to no human involvement. 1 Since AI's contribution and autonomous invention process is exponentially growing, there have been instances where a patent applicant has opted to name an AI programme as the inventor in a patent application. The patent offices of the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and New Zealand recently rejected a patent application seeking inventorship for an AI computer. Australia and South Africa, on the other hand, have recognised AI as an inventor. In light of the various approaches used around the world, this article examines the key question that emerges in patent granting: can an AI system that is not a natural person be recognised as an inventor and granted a patent in India, including inventorship and ownership?","PeriodicalId":39166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70707148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

A Shift from State’s Exclusivity to Respecting Party Autonomy: Conceptualising IP Arbitration in India 从国家排他性到尊重当事人自主权的转变:印度知识产权仲裁的概念化

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i2.1270

{"title":"A Shift from State’s Exclusivity to Respecting Party Autonomy: Conceptualising IP Arbitration in India","authors":"","doi":"10.56042/jipr.v28i2.1270","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v28i2.1270","url":null,"abstract":"The consumer-based and technology-driven economy has triggered competitiveness amongst companies. In the ever-evolving market space, the companies have recognised the significance of generating intangible assets such as trademarks, patents, and trade secrets to remain competitive. Due to globalisation, international business transactions with respect to these intangible assets have led to an increase in intellectual property disputes. Moreover, due to IP's complex nature, the risks involved in IP litigation can be burdensome in cross-border IP disputes coupled with the Court’s cumbersome procedure. Given that the stakeholders prefer out-of-court dispute resolution systems like arbitration to resolve their commercial disputes, arbitrating IP disputes is slowly gaining traction. Even though India’s courts have expressed their leaning towards arbitrating IP disputes, the same has become practically impossible due to various impediments in the existing mechanism. This article surveys the current IP arbitration regime and uncovers the existing impediments and loopholes in IP arbitration. Further, the article explores the possibility of liberalising the IP arbitration regime by taking cues from jurisdictions across the globe.","PeriodicalId":39166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70707202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

SEP Litigations & Issues in Determining the FRAND License SEP诉讼&确定FRAND许可的问题

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i5.4196

引用次数: 1