Journal of Intellectual Property Rights最新文献_第3页

Framing Intellectual Property Rights in the Indian Print Media 印度印刷媒体的知识产权框架

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i1.533

引用次数: 1

Relationship between Human Rights and Copyright Law: Bibliometric Analysis 人权与著作权法的关系:文献计量学分析

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i1.535

引用次数: 1

From ‘Anti Suit Injunction’ to ‘Anti Anti Suit Injunction’, Where would this Journey End? Part-I 从“反诉禁令”到“反反诉禁令”，这段旅程将在哪里结束?第一部分

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i1.545

引用次数: 1

Social Media and Copyright: An Indian Perspective 社交媒体与版权:印度人的视角

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i5.5619

引用次数: 1

Registration of Works belonging to the Public Domain as Trademarks 将属于公共领域的作品注册为商标

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i5.836

引用次数: 1

Trademark Law Declared by the Supreme Court of India in Twenty-First Century (2000–2009) — I 21世纪印度最高法院宣布的商标法(2000-2009)- 1

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i5.3016

{"title":"Trademark Law Declared by the Supreme Court of India in Twenty-First Century (2000–2009) — I","authors":"","doi":"10.56042/jipr.v28i5.3016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v28i5.3016","url":null,"abstract":"The Parliament of India makes, amends, and unmakes law. The Supreme Court of India (hereinafter, the Supreme Court),under Article 141 of the Constitution of India, declares the law and makes and unmakes the law. These constitutional powers oftwo branches are related but separate. The Supreme Court in the first decade of 21st century has delivered 23 decisions on thetrademark law. On an average, the Supreme Court has decided 2.3 (point three) trademark cases in a year; or one trademarkcase in 158.82 (point eight two) days or in .43 (point four three) years. A review of reported 21st century decisions reveals thatthe Court has: (i) declared trademark law in 17 decisions; (ii) not only interpreted the provisions of the statutes but has alsoconstructed them; (iii) not declared anything on the constitutionality of the trademark statutes as no such question ofconstitutionality was brought before it; (iv) delivered all the decisions unanimously as no dissenting or concurring judgment isreported; and (v) decided maximum number of cases by Division Bench (21) and remaining 2 cases by Full Bench. It is alsoobserved that no sitting or acting Chief Justices of India was on the Bench in any of the cases. Paper proceeds with the sameargument and method as developed in the first four papers on patent law, copyright law, design law and trademark law intwentieth-century published under the theme ‘IP Laws Declared by the Supreme Court’. This Paper seeks to cull out theprinciples of trademark law as declared by the Supreme Court in the first decade of the twenty-first century.","PeriodicalId":39166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135799276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain: A Breakthrough Collaboration in IP Law 人工智能与b区块链:知识产权法的突破性合作

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i5.981

{"title":"Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain: A Breakthrough Collaboration in IP Law","authors":"","doi":"10.56042/jipr.v28i5.981","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v28i5.981","url":null,"abstract":"Artificial Intelligence and blockchain technology now influence the intellectual property environment. For example, machine learning is now regularly used in trademark and patent searches in IP databases. Machine learning implementations in different IP areas, including patent tracking, copyright evaluation, and trademark comparisons, can now be seen more often. A vast range of LP notary implementations are proposed using blockchain technologies, and new networks emerge, using both AIs and blockchains to build new IP communities. The growth of such technology in LPP is mainly driven by the IT industries, particularly technology entrepreneurs. In the context of the non-registered IP rights such as copyright (which under the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works and in many jurisdictions is not registrable) and unregistered design rights, blockchain technology can play an important role, too, because it can prove its conception, use and qualification (for example the countries where the design was first marketed and originality). Uploading the author or creator’s work and design data into a blockchain would produce a time-stamped record and solid proof of originality.So, IPO has laid the groundwork for the technology’s fusion into the IP ecosystem. Several other possible uses include ledger management, the creation of a monitoring authority to track the use of IP properties in the market and commercialization for investors via a bidding system. It will provide innovators with a centralized, government-backed market to attract investors and technology titans.","PeriodicalId":39166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135799505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Patent Law Declared by the Supreme Court of India 印度最高法院宣布的专利法

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i1.543

引用次数: 1

The Canadian UGC Exception: An Attempt to Revolutionise Fair Use Defence for User Generated Content 加拿大UGC例外:对用户生成内容的合理使用辩护进行革命的尝试

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i2.555

†. NiharikaSalar

引用次数: 1

Private Ordering in Copyright Law: The Impact on Fair Use Activities on the Internet 著作权法中的私人秩序:对网络上合理使用活动的影响

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.56042/jipr.v28i2.621

引用次数: 1