Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja最新文献

Enakost v različnem: dejstva in spoznanja o politični problematiki dveh jugoslovanskih držav 差异中的平等：两个南斯拉夫国家政治问题的事实与教训

Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI: 10.51663/pnz.63.2.09

Zdenko Čepič

{"title":"Enakost v različnem: dejstva in spoznanja o politični problematiki dveh jugoslovanskih držav","authors":"Zdenko Čepič","doi":"10.51663/pnz.63.2.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51663/pnz.63.2.09","url":null,"abstract":"V zgodovini Slovencev se Jugoslaviji ni mogoče izogniti, saj je z njo povezana tudi zgodovina slovenske državnosti oziroma nastajanja slovenske države, prav tako osamosvojitev Slovenije in nastanek neodvisne in suverene slovenske države. To sodi v našo zgodovino, prav tako kot vanjo sodijo življenje Slovencev pod Habsburžani in vse, kar se je zgodilo na našem ozemlju in je vplivalo na takratno življenje tukajšnjega prebivalstva, razvoj Slovencev kot naroda in Slovenije kot države. Zgodovina je nekaj celovitega in ne nekaj, kar nekomu danes ni všeč, kar je treba iz nje izpustiti, spregledati ali pa prikazati kot nekaj skrajno negativnega. To vsaj pri določenih političnih subjektih sedaj velja za Jugoslavijo. Zgodovino želijo prilagoditi svojim političnim pogledom in potrebam. Zgodovinopisje se temu ne sme ukloniti in Jugoslavija, prva in druga, morata imeti v slovenski zgodovini svoj prostor. Podoba prve in druge Jugoslavije je v zgodovini slovenskega naroda lahko le takšna, kot jo izriše znanstveno zgodovinopisje. Obdobje življenja v Jugoslaviji je del slovenske zgodovine in ga je treba kot takšno tudi zgodovinopisno obravnavati.","PeriodicalId":38904,"journal":{"name":"Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135010636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The hour of European truth for Slovenian intellectuals 斯洛文尼亚知识分子的欧洲真理时刻

Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI: 10.51663/pnz.63.2.04

Marko Zajc

{"title":"The hour of European truth for Slovenian intellectuals","authors":"Marko Zajc","doi":"10.51663/pnz.63.2.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51663/pnz.63.2.04","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the author presents and analyses the political activity of Slovenian opposition intellectuals during the period of Slovenia's EU accession (1995-97). In the summer of 1997, a group of intellectuals from the Nova revija circle published a public letter \"An Hour of European Truth for Slovenia\", in which they criticised the social and political situation and the government's poor policy of EU and NATO approximation. The signatories of the public letter perceived the then rule of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDS), which was the successor of the official youth organisation under socialism, as undemocratic rule by former communists who held all the strings of power. In approaching the EU, they opposed the agreement with Italy on the purchase of Slovenian real estate (the so-called Spanish Compromise). Although they were in principle in favour of EU membership, they also collaborated in their activism with a group of outspoken Eurosceptics. In the first part of the paper, the author presents Slovenian politics in the 1990s, while in the second part he briefly describes the process of Slovenia's accession to the EU and NATO. In the third part, the author describes the background and activities of the group of intellectuals in question. The fourth part analyses the public letter and the public reactions. In the conclusion, the author poses a question whether the actors mentioned were Eurosceptics. In his opinion, the concept of Euroscepticism does not help to understand the complex and ambivalent attitudes of political actors towards Europe and the EU. In conclusion, the author highlights the trajectory of Slovenian anticommunist political thought up to the present day.","PeriodicalId":38904,"journal":{"name":"Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136380658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

»Bivša Avstrija ni imela nobenega smisla, da bi v dolgih stoletjih svoje vlade vodo zravnavala, /…/ ker je bila zaposlena povsod drugod, le pri nas po možnosti malo.« "前奥地利在其漫长的几个世纪的统治期间，/....../把水弄直是没有意义的，因为它在其他地方都很忙，但可能只在这里忙一点"。

Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja Pub Date : 2023-09-18 DOI: 10.51663/pnz.63.2.07

Filip Čuček

引用次数: 0

Šole govorijo 学校发言

Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI: 10.51663/pnz.63.2.08

Matic Batič

引用次数: 0

European Politics Behind Closed Doors: The Origins of Euroscepticism in Slovenia 闭门后的欧洲政治:斯洛文尼亚欧洲怀疑主义的起源

Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI: 10.51663/pnz.63.2.02

Jure Gašparič, Andrej Pančur, Jure Skubic

{"title":"European Politics Behind Closed Doors: The Origins of Euroscepticism in Slovenia","authors":"Jure Gašparič, Andrej Pančur, Jure Skubic","doi":"10.51663/pnz.63.2.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51663/pnz.63.2.02","url":null,"abstract":"Euroscepticism is a common political problem in many EU member states or potential candidates. There is a general belief that the EU is a giant bureaucratic structure and as such distant, colossal and suspicious, which creates a growing distance between the EU and its citizens. Such ambivalent sentiment towards the EU could be noticed also in Slovenia after it gained independence from Yugoslavia and started the process of joining the EU. The general public opinion about the EU was rather low – people were generally sympathetic about the EU but never completely enthusiastic about it. What attributed to such attitude was also the fact that politicians adopted several regulations without properly informing the public therefore leaving people uninformed about potentially important issues. In this paper, we argue that the threat to representative democracy is not so much in politicians not keeping their promises but rather in politicians not telling their constituents what they are working on and adopting more regulations than communicated with public. Our analysis of election manifestos, public opinion and press releases uncovers two fundamental problems of the Slovenian government between 2000 and 2004. The first one is an almost routine adoption of EU regulations without serious public debates and the second government’s failure to communicate relevant matters with public in a timely manner, problematize them and bring them closer to people. Although the analysis focuses on events that happen around 20 years ago, we believe that our findings are highly relevant also for the state of Slovenian politics today.","PeriodicalId":38904,"journal":{"name":"Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136222686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Campaigning Europe 竞选欧洲

Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.51663/pnz.63.2.03

Adéla Gjuričová

引用次数: 0

Project Outline: “Constitution and Development of Political Parties in Germany from 1989/90 to the present” 项目大纲:“1989/90年至今德国政党的构成与发展”

Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.51663/pnz.63.2.06

Sven Jüngerkes, Tobias Kaiser

引用次数: 0

The European Union in the Russian State Duma Debates, 1994–2004 俄罗斯国家杜马辩论中的欧盟，1994-2004

Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.51663/pnz.63.2.05

Ivan Sablin

{"title":"The European Union in the Russian State Duma Debates, 1994–2004","authors":"Ivan Sablin","doi":"10.51663/pnz.63.2.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51663/pnz.63.2.05","url":null,"abstract":"Although the European Union (EU) was occasionally presented in a positive light in the lower house of the Russian parliament (the State Duma) in 1994–2004, there were also numerous criticisms of the EU and the “European community” in a broader sense. The discussions were accompanied by vocally articulated anxieties by those factions that were oppositional to the President and the Government but had a strong foothold in the parliament, such as the conservative Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF), the rightwing populist Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR), and the rightwing Rodina (“Motherland”) Party and its predecessors. These anxieties pertained to Chechnya, Yugoslavia, Ukraine, and the Baltic states as the spaces of contestation between Russia and the EU. The projects of (re)building the Russian (Soviet) imperial formation on the basis of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) or the Union State (of Russia and Belarus) were presented as alternatives to Western European integration based on the EU and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The anti-EU rhetoric in the Duma, which came hand in hand with the denunciation of NATO, provided a discursive foundation for the eventual shift of the President’s and the Government’spolicy. The members of United Russia, the Government’s party without a clear ideology that won a constitutional majority in 2003, adopted elements of conservative and rightwing rhetoric of the formal opposition in 2004. This happened in the context of the EU enlargement when the issues of the accessibility of the Kaliningrad Region and the rights of the Russian speakers in Latvia and Estonia were discussed in the parliament. Later the same year, the start of the Orange Revolution in Ukraine became a further impetus for the Duma’s anti-EU discourse, a discourse that would soon become mainstream in Russian politics.","PeriodicalId":38904,"journal":{"name":"Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135194246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

From the EC to the EU. Ready or Not 从欧洲共同体到欧盟。准备好了吗?

Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.51663/pnz.63.2.01

Mark Gilbert

引用次数: 0

[Supply in the Third Reich]. [第三帝国的供应]。

Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja Pub Date : 2002-01-01

Mojca Sorn

引用次数: 0