The European Union in the Russian State Duma Debates, 1994–2004

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Ivan Sablin
{"title":"The European Union in the Russian State Duma Debates, 1994–2004","authors":"Ivan Sablin","doi":"10.51663/pnz.63.2.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the European Union (EU) was occasionally presented in a positive light in the lower house of the Russian parliament (the State Duma) in 1994–2004, there were also numerous criticisms of the EU and the “European community” in a broader sense. The discussions were accompanied by vocally articulated anxieties by those factions that were oppositional to the President and the Government but had a strong foothold in the parliament, such as the conservative Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF), the rightwing populist Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR), and the rightwing Rodina (“Motherland”) Party and its predecessors. These anxieties pertained to Chechnya, Yugoslavia, Ukraine, and the Baltic states as the spaces of contestation between Russia and the EU. The projects of (re)building the Russian (Soviet) imperial formation on the basis of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) or the Union State (of Russia and Belarus) were presented as alternatives to Western European integration based on the EU and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The anti-EU rhetoric in the Duma, which came hand in hand with the denunciation of NATO, provided a discursive foundation for the eventual shift of the President’s and the Government’spolicy. The members of United Russia, the Government’s party without a clear ideology that won a constitutional majority in 2003, adopted elements of conservative and rightwing rhetoric of the formal opposition in 2004. This happened in the context of the EU enlargement when the issues of the accessibility of the Kaliningrad Region and the rights of the Russian speakers in Latvia and Estonia were discussed in the parliament. Later the same year, the start of the Orange Revolution in Ukraine became a further impetus for the Duma’s anti-EU discourse, a discourse that would soon become mainstream in Russian politics.","PeriodicalId":38904,"journal":{"name":"Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51663/pnz.63.2.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the European Union (EU) was occasionally presented in a positive light in the lower house of the Russian parliament (the State Duma) in 1994–2004, there were also numerous criticisms of the EU and the “European community” in a broader sense. The discussions were accompanied by vocally articulated anxieties by those factions that were oppositional to the President and the Government but had a strong foothold in the parliament, such as the conservative Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF), the rightwing populist Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR), and the rightwing Rodina (“Motherland”) Party and its predecessors. These anxieties pertained to Chechnya, Yugoslavia, Ukraine, and the Baltic states as the spaces of contestation between Russia and the EU. The projects of (re)building the Russian (Soviet) imperial formation on the basis of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) or the Union State (of Russia and Belarus) were presented as alternatives to Western European integration based on the EU and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The anti-EU rhetoric in the Duma, which came hand in hand with the denunciation of NATO, provided a discursive foundation for the eventual shift of the President’s and the Government’spolicy. The members of United Russia, the Government’s party without a clear ideology that won a constitutional majority in 2003, adopted elements of conservative and rightwing rhetoric of the formal opposition in 2004. This happened in the context of the EU enlargement when the issues of the accessibility of the Kaliningrad Region and the rights of the Russian speakers in Latvia and Estonia were discussed in the parliament. Later the same year, the start of the Orange Revolution in Ukraine became a further impetus for the Duma’s anti-EU discourse, a discourse that would soon become mainstream in Russian politics.
俄罗斯国家杜马辩论中的欧盟,1994-2004
虽然欧盟(EU)在1994-2004年期间偶尔会在俄罗斯议会下院(国家杜马)以积极的姿态出现,但在更广泛的意义上,对欧盟和“欧洲共同体”也有许多批评。伴随着讨论的是那些反对总统和政府但在议会中有强大立足点的派系,如保守的俄罗斯联邦共产党(KPRF)、右翼民粹主义的俄罗斯自由民主党(LDPR)和右翼的罗迪纳党(“祖国”)及其前身,口头表达了焦虑。这些焦虑与车臣、南斯拉夫、乌克兰和波罗的海国家有关,因为它们是俄罗斯和欧盟之间争论的空间。在独立国家联合体(CIS)或联盟国家(俄罗斯和白俄罗斯)的基础上(重新)建立俄罗斯(苏联)帝国的计划被提出作为以欧盟和北大西洋公约组织(北约)为基础的西欧一体化的替代方案。杜马的反欧盟言论与对北约的谴责携手而来,为总统和政府政策的最终转变提供了话语基础。政府所属的统一俄罗斯党(United Russia)没有明确的意识形态,但在2003年赢得了宪法规定的多数席位,该党成员在2004年采纳了正式反对派的保守和右翼言论。这种情况发生在欧盟扩大的背景下,当时议会讨论了加里宁格勒地区的无障碍问题以及拉脱维亚和爱沙尼亚俄语使用者的权利问题。同年晚些时候,乌克兰橙色革命的开始进一步推动了杜马的反欧盟言论,这一言论很快成为俄罗斯政治的主流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信